I've done a cursory reading of it and here are just a couple of conclusions that I come to of the top of my head.
1.) It seems more a rebellion than a satirization.
2.) Different shift in composition from ideal and balanced to one of tension
3.) Beginning of abstraction as the figures were not idealized, but stylized
4.) Breaking and rejecting hundreds of years of 'learned draftsmanship' such as perspective in the images
I will have to mull it a bit as I am not familiar with many of the artists they reference and others, I can't remember who came first to last. So I have to actually digest it a bit more.
More than likely, I will come back and refute myself later LOL
_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.
RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8