I manage to get away with being fairly neutral, depending on who's looking and what preconceptions they might have. I know it's natural for transfolk to be self conscious and paranoid that something is preventing them from "passing" but it seems to me a crazy amount of it is actually about the other person, not you. Some people might just look at your description of your clothing and think "male," because that's the way they believe males dress, and your voice might completely slip by them after they have made that determination and put you in that category in their heads.
With the no options thing, today I was up on my own tiny gender neutral soapbox when I enrolled for a training course, and they had a personal details page with a dropdown menu thing with "male" and "female."
It was a mandatory question and the application would not go through if you didn't answer (which makes no difference anyway, what goes it matter if your students are male or female?) with no other option.
Then there was a compulsory declaration that made you swear you had provided no false information.
Well. I wrote them an email telling them that they had given me no choice but to provide false information, as they had not included an option for me to tell the truth. I am legally and physically not male, nor female. I am legally "unspecified," or on some documents, "X."
If there is legal precedent for people like me, then mainstream training organisations should have the capacity to obey the damn law.
_________________
Alexithymia - 147 points.
Low-Verbal.