PurpleReject wrote:
Sexuality isn't black and white, it's very fluid, so there's no strict definitions. Be attracted to who (or what) you're attracted to, and don't worry about labels.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca373/ca373cf6105a277f71f4423a82446d04559f9055" alt="Smile :)"
When it comes to males, I also vastly prefer the more feminine variety (twinks), over muscle-men or bears...mostly because I'm not either of those latter two myself. It's not unusual.
As far as cartoon characters, I think you'll find there's an entire subculture of people who are into that more than real people. I'll admit myself I've seen some sexy toons in my life, though I ultimately prefer the flesh.
Thanks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca373/ca373cf6105a277f71f4423a82446d04559f9055" alt="Smile :)"
I think people get too worked up over labels nowadays, and for some people it's like a pissing contest to see who can have the biggest collection of labels.
I like skinny, athletic builds that aren't too muscular, but I'm not into people who are really ripped. This applies to both males and females for me. I'm also not into "bears" even though I could easily be one myself.
I'm a furry, so I'm into anthropomorphic animal characters. They tend to be cuter than humans IMO. Not that I don't like humans, they're just less likely to be cute to me. But yeah, when you're talking furries or anime fans, a lot of them like fictional characters better than real people.
_________________
Every day is exactly the same...