MrFrancisAndrew wrote:
Most "rock snobs" would look down on this bollocks. *Actual* emo is as sh** as that MTV produced dong... why is that you ask?
Simple, both have dramatic whinging. Both make me roll my eyes and say "eurgh".
But then again, you're all too bloody pretentious to get that fact and probably will defend possibly the worst genre in the world to the death. Bloody emo kids.
Let us see. I am a music writer. I've written essay upon essay on music in High School for my paper (odd because I was the movie critic, but they did not have a music critic so I became that by defacto because of my encyclopedic knowledge of music). I am a rock snob. I own several hundred CDs, LPs and actually one eight track tape (Pink Floyd's "Animals". Any real Floyd fan will tell you why that tape is unique). Friends call me Rob Gordon after the charecter played by John Cusack in the movie adaptation of Nick Hornby's excellent book "High Fidelity". Even Chuck Klosterman, the snobbiest rock snob of them all (and therefore the hero to many up and coming music critics like myself) likes real emo groups like Bright Eyes and talks about them in his essays.
At the Drive-In, Weezer, Modest Mouse and Bright Eyes, all emo bands or at one time flirted with the genre are all critically beloved, successful rock acts. Fugazi, who prided themselves on being fiercely independent are so on the opposite spectrum of the genre that the label of "emo" at least to the new MTVemo standard, they are now a "punk band".
For instance, the genre of "rap" encompasses both the uninventive music of MiMs and Flo Rida and the 5 1/2 minutes of genius that is OutKast's "B.O.B." (which is a song loved by even non-hip hop fans). The genre of "alternative rock" encompasses both the boringness of Candlebox and the innovativeness of My Bloody Valentine. Country includes both the Wal-Mart Country musicians like Alan Jackson and the real country of Johnny Cash. Even in the worst genres there are great bands and many of the newer bands are the ones that suck. However, "emo" to some kids has now become a label for all rock music. A kid saw my Arctic Monkeys t-shirt today and called me emo. Arctic Monkeys are not emo in the least. Not even good emo. They're either a Britpop band or a Post-Punk Revival band. I hate MCR and Fall Out Boy (well actually the only good thing about FOB is that their drummer is pretty good, but everything else about them is awful) because they have cheapened an otherwise excellent genre. Ditto Hawthorne Heights an all the bands I listed as Fake Emo.
Alot of the fake emo comes from bands who don't grasp what The Cure was about. The Cure formed in 1976, and out of their first recordings inadvertedly started alternative rock (the Velvets and the Stooges INFLUENCED alternative rock, ditto punk. The Cure, XTC, The Jam, Squeeze - this is where it started). Then they moved to darker music on their second and third record culminating in the tome of gloom that is "Pornography". The next recording they did was the single "Let's Go to Bed". That song is as far away from the songs on "Pornography" as you could possibly get. They've now spent 25 years combining these two extremes. Fake emo bands - instead of having this balance - have instead poppified "Pornography"-era music instead of adding pop to it.
Thank you for letting me waste your time.
Question, MrFrancisAndrew, what music do you consider good?
_________________
here be dragons