awes wrote:
I've practised a bit today and have reuploaded my new composition:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgCYo7V1a_g&feature=youtube_gdata[/youtube]
Dude, I think you just keep getting better.
My usual complaints aside, I'll just summarize by saying this:
If you're working within a tonal context, you bear the burden of having to be extraordinarily good to make it work. You're practicing, revising, and I think you're well on your way.
So, that aside...
I think you would benefit by carefully studying form in music. Cut down on the amount of thematic material you use. Stick with one or two main themes and make that the focus of your work. As I've mentioned in the past, you're doing more interesting things rhythmically, and I like how your melody is free from your accompaniment. Something that I'm finding difficult to listen to are the large number of pieces you've written so far that seem dominated by motor rhythms. Give your left hand time to rest at some point. I dunno if I'll ever get my piece for piano and strings on youtube, but each movement focused on a specific mood supported by different rhythmic treatments. The Prelude was minimalist-influenced and was driven by changes in volume intensity rather than rhythm alone, since there was no distinct melody. I followed that up with a fugue, which relied on counterpoint and interplay among all the instruments, pitting the piano against the strings in some places and not even requiring all players to play all the time. I had a slow movement that featured each instrumentalist individually. A frantic movement that borrowed material from a Chicago song and a Beatles song. And after all that was done, I wrote a chorale which started out with strings only and ended with just the piano. The final movement was more like a pop song form with a modulation in the last "verse."
Writing a fugue might be a little much for you at this point. They're difficult to write and even more difficult to actually play, but you can look at Bach's fugues to get an idea. I think maybe Hindemith also wrote several fugues, but I can't remember... Even if you never write in a strict fugal style, it's a great way to get some ideas about how to think more in terms of counterpoint rather than just "melody-accompinment." Something in a more chorale-like style might be easier for you to do. It doesn't even really matter if you follow all the voice-leading "rules" to write a chorale, but at the very least come up with a melody/counter-melody supported by chords underneath, and have the chords change with every one or two notes of the melody. It's an extremely simplistic way of composing, but valid none-the-less.
As for specific forms I think you should explore: Think theme-and-variation, rondo, and eventually fugue. Chorales are typically strophe form, which means one or two themes, usually a half-cadence somewhere, and repeat. It's more typical of choral music, not instrumental, so the challenge is how to make something repetitive sound interesting. Varying voicing and register (octave) are two ways of playing the same thing over again but fooling the listener into thinking he's hearing something different. You can also change key (like moving to the dominant) or mode (major/minor), and maybe end by expanding or thinning out the texture (like start out with 3 or 4 voices and end with 5 or 6, or full chords in both hands, or vice versa). One historically significant form is sonata-allegro, but I think you'd do better focussing on forms that don't require motivic or thematic development until you've really practiced handling thematic material in very basic ways.
Rondo is probably the easiest. Here's perfect textbook case of rondo form:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yomi0-WL5Pg
It's not about speed but rather the alternation of different themes. Notice how the accompaniment changes from theme to theme.
Another quasi-rondo form is Beethoven's Bagatelle in A minor, aka "Für Elise."