Bun wrote:
Mindslave wrote:
Any music that is solely for business purposes. The word 'artist' implies that there is art involved, and art cannot be forced. Justin Bieber isn't so bad. His style isn't for me, but he isn't like Nicki Minaj, or Rihanna, or most rappers. Rap is supposed to have a message larger than just the artist. Public Enemy, Tupac, Eminem to a lesser extent, they are OK. Pure self-glorification is pure crap. Some hair metal can be catchy, but most of it is about sex, drugs, and fame. So artists like Taylor Swift, Avril Lavigne, Pitbull, any artist who takes himself or herself too seriously. It's just music, not a social movement. Music itself does not count as a social movement. One Direction is gay like Bieber, but at least they have fun with it. Being a musician is NOT A CAREER. It is a temporary job.
Do you know any artists that aren't overly popular? Next thing you'll say what you think about Lady Gaga.
The question here is "any musicians or singers or artists I hate that I blacklist" and my answer was music that is solely for business, as in commercial art strictly for sale. Yes, I know of artists that aren't overly popular, but I used popular artists to illustrate my point. (I'm obviously not very good at making points) The last sentence came out wrong; I just mean that you can't be the hot new guy in town forever, and that it's not all about the money and the fame. As Zokk mentioned, Klayton is a career artist. He's one of my favorites, and has been for a while. If someone loves what they do, it shows, often in the form of iambic pentameter. And then, of course, there are traveling musicians, like my best friend and his wife. A studio isn't always required, and in fact it must not be a requirement.