kraftiekortie wrote:
Thanks for your response. I can't really ask the question better, as I've only a "listening" knowledge of Indian music.
I'll try:
What's different about classical southern Indian music, in comparison to classical Northern Indian music?
I could understand that a verbal/written response is difficult--as music frequently does not invite a suitable verbal/written response (at least to me). The response, frequently, is the FEELING which goes through your body and mind as you listen to it, a totally subjective feeling which could be utterly incomprehensible to another, no matter how hard you try to explain it.
I just explained this but then it wouldn't let me send the message so I will explain again or try to. Classical South Indian(Carnatic) uses different versions of the same musical structures found in Classical North Indian(Hindustani), called Raags in Hindi and Ragams in Tamil. Also, there is less emphasis on improvisation and instrumentation(think Ravi Shankar and the Sitar) and more emphasis on strict adherence to vocal technique and percussion. Personally I find that Carnatic has a brighter, more intense feel to it, although I don't listen to it often, however I listen to it more than I do Hindustani. I'm not that big on the Sitar and other instruments. However, I enjoy a style of North Indian Classical called Qawwali, which is a mixture of Sufi Islam and some north Indian classical music(Tabla Drums, some harmonium, which is like an accordion, and the saregama musical scale, which is Sa, Re, Ga, Ma, Pa, Da Ni, and to make it a mirror of Do Re Mi, you simply add Sa on the end.)
This was probably more information than you wanted, but I hope it explains everything.
I'll add some videos too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOeOzQCMXMc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOeOzQCMXMc