Here's the thing. Neurotypical people do not tend to think extensively about social interaction; they just do it, most of the time, and they do it very well. They do not agonise about this one single word that brought that particular world crashing about their ears. They do not overly concern themselves with the discomfort of being a social outsider looking in. They do not map and remap the complexities of social interaction to try to establish some definitive truth, they just get on and live it. Should it be a surprise to anyone to find that many writers have Aspergers? Do you realise how difficult it is to write a great novel, how to sustain it and bring it home, all plates still spinning? It's a job for someone with a meticulous attention to detail, and a one-track dedication. Ring any bells? I have one of those ever-so-helpful information sheets about Aspergers - my son is diagnosed - and it says, your child will be good at Maths and bad at English and Art, in fact any subject where the student needs to show creativity. What rubbish, what utter arse! People with Aspergers devote themselves to the minutiae of many topics; philosophy, mathematics, electronics - how does literature differ from those subjects? Isn't it all just one? Aren't students of social interaction who have Aspergers just as likely to top their field, and aren't they perhaps more likely to bring a new way of seeing the way that two people interact?
Great writers with Aspergers may be hard to spot because they acquire skills from their observations and thus pass beneath the radar. Also, if you meet a writer who happens to be a little intense, you think, 'ah, that's a writer'. You don't think 'ah, that man's got Aspergers'. However, into the mix I would throw Franz Kafka and Iris Murdoch (who is reported to have had real trouble understanding the rules of Mornington Crescent, which is a sure-fire diagnosis, in my book!)
So don't have any worries about writing. If it is your thing, then make it your thing.