Aerith wrote:
Personally, whilst I do, indeed, love the darker shades of music, and a fair share of black metal, I don't feel much with DSBM. To me, I can't help but see the name of the genre as merely a moniker or a marketing ploy, which, given the inherently "underground" nature of black metal, is repulsive to me.
If anything, it feels as though the bands would label themselves as Depressive Suicidal in order to appeal to a niche group of people because they feel their work isn't sufficiently good enough to get anywhere just under the label of black metal.
No, I'm not trying to insult you all; I'd merely like you to consider particularly how this subgenre differs from black metal as a whole. By differ, I mean in the musical sense, not the lyrical or thematic one.
Oh, and to anyone who listens to black metal and looks up to the crazy things the band members do (Dead's cutting self during shows and his suicide), you really need to rethink what the genre means to you. These things are either gimmicks...or they're things severely schizophrenic people (like Dead) do.
With the former...well, you should be able to rationally ignore and be above such things.
In the case of the latter, ask any schizophrenic person who is aware of their state if they like being disconnected to reality the way they are and I guarantee you they won't answer in the affirmative. Black metal is not about the silly sh** these people have done which no sane person would do; it's about the music, first and foremost. Had I been aware of black metal in the way I am not when Dead died, I'd have mourned him, much the way I'd have mourned Quorthon. It's not the crap they pulled on stage or in their otherwise-personal lives that matters, it's the sheer genius of their music.
I actually agree with much of this. Black metal shouldn’t be big because of some dubious background story but unfortunately often is.
Though probably more noise than bm, I remember a few years back when everyone I was talking to on messenger would talk about how “terrifying” Stalaggh were for having the most messed up, crazy mental patients on vocals. There would be little mention of the music itself.
Or, as already mentioned in this thread, Silencer gaining notoriety, partly at least, due to the myth that the vocalist was a mental patient who cut off his own arms. It also couldn’t hurt to mention several manufacturers of psychiatric medications in the “thank you” notes of the album.
Perhaps the very best example is how hardly anyone cared about Velvet Cacoon after the backstory of their “dieselharp”, members being part of ELF etc. was totally blown apart.
I’m not saying that people shouldn’t like these artists if they actually enjoy the music (I myself like a few dsbm bands as well as Velvet Cacoon), just that it’s a shame that people aren’t more weary of some of these stories, the purpose they serve for the artist and the notoriety this as opposed to the music alone brings them.
Quote:
Anyway, I'm feeling inspired enough to have another listen of good ol' Blood Fire Death.
Amen.