Litguy wrote:
Wow, I disagree. As part of the "acid" generation (I only did acid once, that was enough, but did a little grass), I have to say that there is some jazz in the 50's and early 60's that is totally "psychologically immersive." Check out some John Coltrane or Miles Davis or Charlie Parker.
It may not be your taste, but I don't think it can be called shallow.
Yeah, that's the kind of stuff I missed out on hearing and I'd imagine that if I'd been around back then that's what I would have gravitated toward. I just tend to associate the proliferation of a deeper sound with state-of-mind exploration and people reexamining existential realities in a much more intense, surrealized, and internal way through music - hence someone didn't have to be living in hell itself practically (whether through poverty, addiction, depression, etc.) as often to make really good music like that. I guess I'm not talking about that stuff so much, just more of what my dad kinda pushed off in my direction. Also I really don't mean to be condescending, a lot of people used to really euphemise stronger emotions in their music or play it off with tongue & cheek wit and sarcasm - that's got its own effect as well but it just doesn't pull me in the same way as someone going no holds barred and really painting it vividly.