The Stand, then;
It was interesting reading it in the light of having recently read Earth Abides, to which it clearly owes a lot.
It was interesting reading it as a loose part of the Mythos, and there were some good pop-culture links in there. There were also some overblown ones.
I don't know enough about King's Dark Tower series (I read the first one but didn't think much of it) and later developments to understand where The Stand fits or how the updated edition of the book has been changed.
The writing was always very readable, but occasionally seemed juvenile and imitative. The story progression started and ended well but the central section was really tedious for a while.
Most of the characters were very believable most of the time, but there were several instances where they seemed to completely give up on common sense in order to do really stupid things that advanced the plot.
Some of the magical stuff was cool, some was gratuitous, but the overall spiritual theme implied a weak, petty and spiteful God prodding humanity with a stick to battle an overly-strong Adversary; very Manichean and, to me, silly and parochial theology. And not in the spirit of the Mythos neither. None of it was scary (and I have been scared or disturbed by some of his other books) though admittedly it may have been more original and disturbing for its time.
I knew beforehand how Trashcan Man ended up, but I don't think it spoiled it as it was made clear in advance what he was doing. I liked him as a character.
Mother Abagail was really f*****g annoying, but her last words got me good. Doh!
To celebrate finishing the gargantuan Stand, I've moved on to Neal Stephenson's REAMDE, which is almost as bloody long. And within a couple of dozen pages encounter two autistic characters, one of them apparently a Tarn Adams expy. This may be an interesting read.
_________________
No one has gone missing or died.
The year is still young.