Totally! If there's 1 thing I'm not, it's a conformist. Like Billie Joe Armstrong, I too wanna be the minority. I hate being told by others what to do, and I like to break rules that I hate. I think that anyone who's happy with their government/authority is just a mindless sheep who can't think for themselves, because if they could think for themselves, they'd realize how many problems there are with the government and society. Like Against Me!, I am a teenage anarchist, looking for a revolution.
I like punk artists such as Green Day, The Offspring, AFI, The Clash, Blondie, Billy Talent, and The White Stripes.
Pop-punk bands such as Hedley and Sum 41 are pretty good, but they're too mainstream sounding. Anytime you take a genre and add the prefix "pop-" to it, it just trivializes the genre, makes it too generic and mainstream, waters it down, and just overall lames it out. I like to say that pop isn't a genre, it's a lack of genre. All it is is generic sounding mainstream music that has that "I can be myself" triteness to it, but ironically the "myself" sounds exactly the same as everyone else with that attitude. The only reason they produce music like that is because they want to make lots of money off of it, not because they actually care about real music. I prefer more cult/underground music (ex. AFI). I like it better because you have a small fanbase who tend to be really big fans rather than just a majority of people who each like them a bit. This means a higher concentration of popularity overall.
Bands such as Bon Jovi and U2 are pretty good, but they're overrated. 1 thing I appreciate about U2 though is that they're pretty versatile with their music and although they're considered mainstream, their stuff is mostly alternative rock.
The only pop musicians that I like a lot are Michael Jackson and ABBA, because their stuff is actually unique and different and jsut happens to be mainstream rather than most pop which is specifically made to sound like any other music.