Something I noticed yesterday, but seems obvious is how different everyone's art looks on different monitors. I was looking at your pieces yesterday at work and everyone's work, except NeXus_Blueliner, looked a bit washed out. When I got home, and looked at them, everyone's work really popped, had nice contrast, and the colors were more brilliant. For instance WitchsCat's Cat in a Fishbowl looked gorgeous either way. At work, the colors were more pastel, whereas at home the colors and hues had more contrast and more brilliance. For alphineglows watercolors, it really made a difference. At work, alpineglow's watercolors looks a bit washed out, which left me a little perplex. At home, oh my god, what a difference!
So keep in mind when viewing or posting others artwork, what you see is not always what the artist intended. If you compare pictures of an art piece in books and on the web, you will see it can look very different from one image to the other. Art reproduction is tricky.
There are programs to help adjust our monitors contrast, brilliance, and gamma to something approaching a standard, though it is still a bit subjective. I realize that many of you probably know this, but I completely for got this because all of my monitors are calibrated, except the one monitor I was using yesterday.
If you do a search for "calibrating your monitor" adding the operating system name to the serach (windows, window XP, Linux, or mac), you should find directions. On an iPad, which I think some of you use, I'm not sure. You can do a search.
I really do enjoy looking at everyone's work. Thank you for sharing. I like your latest as well, BrandonSP. The composition reminds me of a Vermeer painting, Girl with a Pearl Earring, but that is not why I like it.