Page 4 of 5 [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

FerrariMike_40
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 187

26 Aug 2010, 4:32 pm

adifferentname wrote:
You enjoy other bands, that's fine. It is, however, nothing to do with speculation regarding Yorke or Greenwood. Considering the complexity of Radiohead's music, the constant evolution of their sound and the blending of multiple musical styles I'm a little surprised that you find them 'boring' - especially as you list Oasis as one of your favourite bands. Perhaps you're confusing 'boring' with 'challenging'.


Sorry, but my post was not directed in a personal matter towards you, but it appears you took it that way. I don't care if you like Radiohead for their "evolution of sound" or whatever, that is fine, but that is not going to change my opinion of them.

Quote:
You admit that you only enjoy a limited style of music. I listen to Muse fairly often, but was less than impressed with the last album. Bellamy might be on the spectrum, but I wouldn't put my money on it. He comes across as very gregarious in the few interviews I've seen, which makes me skeptical.


I don't like Muse's newer stuff at all either, but that is beside the point. Not all people with AS are the same, some can teach themselves social skills

Quote:
After stating your certainty that Bellamy has AS I'm wondering if perhaps you're just trying to find a way to relate to your favourite singer. Social alienation is not the sole reason for speculation about Yorke.


Actually my favorite singer is Tom Meighan of Kasabian, who also doesn't like Radiohead or all those other depressing bands.

Quote:
And this is an irrelevant piece of information when speculating on another individual. Or are you now going to argue that all people with AS should act exactly like Nicholls? And let's not forget here that Nicholls AS was not diagnosed when he used it an excuse for kicking a photographer. Considering the alcohol and drug abuse he was subjecting his body to at the time, I believe his diagnosis should be taken with a pinch of salt.


I'll tell you what to take with a pinch of salt, an armchair diagnosis. No one except an expert who knows all about an individual's life story, personality, behavior habits, etc can diagnose that individual with AS, and if it was Tony Attwood who diagnosed Craig Nicholls, then I can trust. And no, I don't think all people with AS act like Nicholls, but I relate a lot more to him than Thom Yorke, but I don't have a temper problem.

And for what it is worth, I've been taking drugs recreationally since before the time I was diagnosed with classical autism, and that doesn't make my diagnosis any less credible.

Quote:
An as*hole according to who exactly? Who are 'all the other British singers'? If you're on about the Gallaghers, they regularly pick fights with artists who have more clout than themselves when a new album is due for release. Strange, eh? You really should learn to form your own opinions instead of blindly believing what famous people tell you to believe.


The Stereophonics singer called him a "miserable twat". Overall, even if he does have AS, he is reportedly not a nice person, and having high functioning AS is not much an excuse for being a "miserable twat". I myself come across as maybe a bit different from other people, but no one has ever said I'm not nice.

The Gallagher's are rock royalty and I can trust them. They have been promoting Kasabian (my #1 favorite band, Oasis is #2) for a long time now so I must have something in common with them. And I'm sorry but insulting people's opinions on the assumption that they are "blind" or conformist or whatever is how a lot of people (with or without AS) alienate themselves.


_________________
ADD. HFA. CCCP. SFRY.


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

26 Aug 2010, 6:11 pm

FerrariMike_40 wrote:
The Stereophonics singer called him a "miserable twat". Overall, even if he does have AS, he is reportedly not a nice person, and having high functioning AS is not much an excuse for being a "miserable twat". I myself come across as maybe a bit different from other people, but no one has ever said I'm not nice.

The Gallagher's are rock royalty and I can trust them. They have been promoting Kasabian (my #1 favorite band, Oasis is #2) for a long time now so I must have something in common with them. And I'm sorry but insulting people's opinions on the assumption that they are "blind" or conformist or whatever is how a lot of people (with or without AS) alienate themselves.


What's worse, being a "miserable twat" who writes "depressing" music or being a straight up as*hole who writes "happy" music?

Quote:
In 2007, Gallagher accused contemporary Thom York of Radiohead of boring fans saying “Thom Yorke sat at a piano singing, This is f****d up, for half an hour. We all know that, Mr Yorke… Who wants to sing the news? No matter how much you sit their twiddling, going, ‘We’re all doomed,’ at the end of the day people will always want to hear you play Creep. Get over it. I never went to f*****g university. I don’t know what a paint brush is; I never went to art school.” Yorke responded by simply saying his education had taught him “to respect other artists.” Commentators observed that this is something which Gallagher has a tendency to fail to do.

reference link



FerrariMike_40
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 187

26 Aug 2010, 6:50 pm

For me, being the "miserable twat" is far, far worse. You can feel free to disagree, I honestly do not care.

The Gallagher brothers are not as*holes. I know so many people are turned off to Oasis because they speak their mind and stand up for the music they make, but I for one admire that cause, and you don't hear them wining and crying like you do with Radiohead. 99% of what the Gallagher brothers say, they're just calling it like it is, or at least the way they see it, something not enough people do. This makes the Gallagher brothers way more genuine people. At the opposite end you have Thom Yorke who doesn't even talk to other Britrock singers, for famous people it's better if they are labeled as*holes who speak their mind, than it is to be the "miserable twat" who is silently arrogant.

Oasis also happens to be my favorite music. You should listen to music because it sounds good, not because you think the singer of the band is misunderstood and has the same anxiety issues you do. But if you think Radiohead sounds good for your ears, then everyone has their own taste and it is completely fine.


_________________
ADD. HFA. CCCP. SFRY.


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

26 Aug 2010, 7:31 pm

FerrariMike_40 wrote:
For me, being the "miserable twat" is far, far worse. You can feel free to disagree, I honestly do not care.

I think a "miserable twat" has more soul than a falsely optimistic as*hole. Truly secure and happy people have no need to bash others or bring them down by calling them "too depressing", "miserable", whatever... Why are some people so threatened when an artist expresses negative emotions through their art? That's what really pisses me off. If you don't like it, can't relate, etc... just listen to something you do like.
Quote:
The Gallagher brothers are not as*holes. I know so many people are turned off to Oasis because they speak their mind and stand up for the music they make, but I for one admire that cause, and you don't hear them wining and crying like you do with Radiohead. 99% of what the Gallagher brothers say, they're just calling it like it is, or at least the way they see it, something not enough people do. This makes the Gallagher brothers way more genuine people. At the opposite end you have Thom Yorke who doesn't even talk to other Britrock singers, for famous people it's better if they are labeled as*holes who speak their mind, than it is to be the "miserable twat" who is silently arrogant.

I could say the same thing about Thom Yorke. A lot of older radiohead fans were annoyed with the more recent albums produced by radiohead and thom yorke because of their political nature. Thom wrote what was on his mind and how he saw the world, without giving a sh*t about the people who he knew would call it "too depressing" or whatever. Also, you have no basis for the claim that he is "silently arrogent". He speaks his mind through his music, blogs, political involvements, etc..., not through his interaction with other musicians/celebrities. Those other artists don't like him because he doesn't want to act chummy and be part of their britrock clique. Sounds familiar.

Quote:
Oasis also happens to be my favorite music. You should listen to music because it sounds good, not because you think the singer of the band is misunderstood and has the same anxiety issues you do. But if you think Radiohead sounds good for your ears, then everyone has their own taste and it is completely fine.

Nothing to disagree with here. I happen to think Radiohead sounds good. I don't judge their music based on anything else. I know Radiohead have a lot of pretentious fans but I don't think the fans reflect the views of the band itself.



katzefrau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,835
Location: emerald city

26 Aug 2010, 7:35 pm

adifferentname wrote:
Quote:
i was making a distinction between arguing for the sake of arguing, to prove someone wrong, and arguing with the intent of arriving at a reasonably accurate conclusion.

you seem to be doing the former, i was attempting to interject the latter.


So you believe that your opinions somehow have more value because of your subjective view that my own opinions were stated merely 'for the sake of arguing'? You will forgive me, of course, if I treat this attitude with more than a little disdain.


i don't care for anyone treating anyone with disdain, really, and opinions are opinions - they are all subjective.

i'm unable to understand the point of debate containing so many veiled insults, and so i guess that is the attitude you're referring to.


adifferentname wrote:
i wrote:
adifferentname wrote:
all you've done so far is set up a series of strawmen and set them alight


and i have no idea what this means.


This is apparent.


welp.

i do understand sarcasm, and as i'm in fact not looking for a fight, i'll go back to watching this one from the sidelines.


_________________
Now a penguin may look very strange in a living room, but a living room looks very strange to a penguin.


FerrariMike_40
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 187

26 Aug 2010, 8:10 pm

marshall wrote:
I think a "miserable twat" has more soul than a falsely optimistic as*hole. Truly secure and happy people have no need to bash others or bring them down by calling them "too depressing", "miserable", whatever... Why are some people so threatened when an artist expresses negative emotions through their art? That's what really pisses me off. If you don't like it, can't relate, etc... just listen to something you do like.

I could say the same thing about Thom Yorke. A lot of older radiohead fans were annoyed with the more recent albums produced by radiohead and thom yorke because of their political nature. Thom wrote what was on his mind and how he saw the world, without giving a sh*t about the people who he knew would call it "too depressing" or whatever. Also, you have no basis for the claim that he is "silently arrogent". He speaks his mind through his music, blogs, political involvements, etc..., not through his interaction with other musicians/celebrities. Those other artists don't like him because he doesn't want to act chummy and be part of their britrock clique. Sounds familiar.

Nothing to disagree with here. I happen to think Radiohead sounds good. I don't judge their music based on anything else. I know Radiohead have a lot of pretentious fans but I don't think the fans reflect the views of the band itself.


Yeah, I can't disagree with this. You make good points.

About Radiohead and their "pretentious fans", I know what you mean. Muse is kind of similar in my opinion. When I first heard them, I thought they were something very cool and a hidden gem, and their songs really struck me. But then they got featured in the Twilight movies and their IMO worst song (SMBH) became the song everyone knew them for, and now Muse is popular among all the teeny bop music, which I just get annoyed with. I'm not mad at society for it, but they were so special in the late '90s and lost their roots.


_________________
ADD. HFA. CCCP. SFRY.


jojobean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk

26 Aug 2010, 8:57 pm

I like radiohead in the 90's as well as U2. Alot of people either love Bono or hate him.
But back on the subject of radiohead. They were the origional alternative band in my opinion...alot of bands try to capture that soulful nerdy but still cool thing and really miss the mark. And most music on the radio aches my soul to the point that I usually dont even turn on the radio. Something happened in music in the turn of the 21 century...I dont understand what it is, but it lacks something vital, but I cant put my finger on it. It is just dead sounds...zombies of musical spirit.


_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

26 Aug 2010, 9:31 pm

FerrariMike_40 wrote:
Yeah, I can't disagree with this. You make good points.

About Radiohead and their "pretentious fans", I know what you mean. Muse is kind of similar in my opinion. When I first heard them, I thought they were something very cool and a hidden gem, and their songs really struck me. But then they got featured in the Twilight movies and their IMO worst song (SMBH) became the song everyone knew them for, and now Muse is popular among all the teeny bop music, which I just get annoyed with. I'm not mad at society for it, but they were so special in the late '90s and lost their roots.

I'll make my peace then.

I see this happen alot on message boards whenever Radiohead gets mentioned. There are these people who act like Thom Yorke is a deity and Radiohead is the only band worth listening to and then in response all the people who don't listen to Radiohead come out of the woodwork and bash the band, going on and on about how overrated, dull, and depressing their music is. I don't want to associate myself with either side, and probably neither does the band itself want to associate with the attitude of some of their fans. I don't think they're as arrogant and pretentious as their own fans make them out to be.

I just get defensive when people bash them for being "dull and depressing". Also, it's not like Radiohead is the only music I listen to. I can get tired of their music after a while too and need to listen to something else for a while in order to come back and enjoy it again, so I can understand that people have different tastes. Though I probably could listen to "OK Computer" on repeat for hours.



BarnettNewman
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 5

26 Aug 2010, 9:58 pm

marshall wrote:
"How to Disappear Completely" is a song that resonates a lot with me. The lyrics themselves are pretty simple but when you add all the weird echoey synth sounds, swelling violins, and dissonant electronic noises along with Thom's voice it adds a lot of depth.


Someone close to me once suggested that this was my theme song. :lol:



adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

26 Aug 2010, 10:05 pm

FerrariMike_40 wrote:
Sorry, but my post was not directed in a personal matter towards you, but it appears you took it that way. I don't care if you like Radiohead for their "evolution of sound" or whatever, that is fine, but that is not going to change my opinion of them.


On what basis do you believe that I took this point personally? I have countered opinion with opinion. I am not interested in changing your opinion, but nor am I going to accept opinion stated as fact, such as "Band X are boring" or "Band Y are depressing". Considering you seem to only be interested in a very narrow field of music, I do not think that you are the best person to comment on the merits of bands that do not fall into that field.

Quote:
I don't like Muse's newer stuff at all either, but that is beside the point. Not all people with AS are the same, some can teach themselves social skills


We've been highlighting the fact that people with AS are different to each other throughout this thread. Repeating it here is hardly necessary, nor is it a rebuttal of my point.

Quote:
Actually my favorite singer is Tom Meighan of Kasabian, who also doesn't like Radiohead or all those other depressing bands.


This article suggests otherwise: <Meighan on Radiohead>

"Radiohead are amazing." - Tom Meighan.

Quote:
I'll tell you what to take with a pinch of salt, an armchair diagnosis. No one except an expert who knows all about an individual's life story, personality, behavior habits, etc can diagnose that individual with AS, and if it was Tony Attwood who diagnosed Craig Nicholls, then I can trust. And no, I don't think all people with AS act like Nicholls, but I relate a lot more to him than Thom Yorke, but I don't have a temper problem.


One final time, just for clarification:

Any viewpoint expressed in this thread should be viewed as opinion or conjecture, and not as a diagnosis. My apologies if this was not already made clear.

Quote:
And for what it is worth, I've been taking drugs recreationally since before the time I was diagnosed with classical autism, and that doesn't make my diagnosis any less credible.


There is a world of difference between taking drugs recreationally and substance abuse.

Quote:
The Stereophonics singer called him a "miserable twat". Overall, even if he does have AS, he is reportedly not a nice person, and having high functioning AS is not much an excuse for being a "miserable twat". I myself come across as maybe a bit different from other people, but no one has ever said I'm not nice.


"I don't know why I said that. He was a bit down in the early days but he's alright now. I think his records are great too. I've been listening to THE BENDS a lot." - Kelly Jones

This is an example of why you should not base your opinions on anything a celebrity says to the press.

Quote:
The Gallagher's are rock royalty and I can trust them. They have been promoting Kasabian (my #1 favorite band, Oasis is #2) for a long time now so I must have something in common with them. And I'm sorry but insulting people's opinions on the assumption that they are "blind" or conformist or whatever is how a lot of people (with or without AS) alienate themselves.


Liking an artists music does not mean that you have anything in common with them. I would happily debate the merits of Oasis' music over the years - In my view they've formulaic and unchallenging, if listenable, since Morning Glory - but I have absolutely no interest in the expressed views of the Gallaghers.

I don't remember anyone insulting your opinions for being conformist. Did I miss something? Usually I would give anyone expressing favouritsm for a band or writer the benefit of the doubt. I personally take each track as it comes - there have been a number of artists I generally dislike who have released something which appealed to me musically. When somebody, such as yourself, argues so vehemently that "Celebrity A must be an a***hole because Celebrity B says so" I am disinclined to have any respect for your opinions, because they are not your opinions at all.



MrNobody
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 25

28 Oct 2010, 11:43 am

Yeah I would say so... I feel "Ok computer" for the lyrics and "Kid A" for the Music. When Im feeling my most AS playing their albums helps.



bucephalus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,847
Location: with Hyperlexian

29 Oct 2010, 1:06 am

I think Radiohead tend to make music that requires a few listens to get into. Maybe the AS connection is there because an Aspie might repeat play something like Radiohead more than a typical NT and hence get hooked.

hope that remotely makes sense :s



Feyokien
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2014
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,303
Location: The Northern Waste

29 Dec 2014, 12:09 am

Yes they sing of themes that we can identify with, but aren't necessarily exclusive to us. Isolation, Desolation, Hopelessness, Depression, Mania, Revenge and the list goes on and on.



Evil_Chuck
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 494
Location: Lost in my thoughts.

29 Dec 2014, 1:10 am

Radiohead are not one of my favorite bands but they do resonate with me on some level. I'm especially keen on 'Kid A.' How to Disappear Completely is one song that really hits home.


_________________
RAADS-R SCORE: 163.0

FUNNY DEATH METAL LYRICS OF THE WEEK: 'DEMON'S WIND' BY VADER
Clammy frog descends
Demon's wind, the stars answer your desire
Join the undead, that's the place you'll never leave
You wanna die... but death cannot do us apart...


just waiting
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

Joined: 3 Jul 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 2
Location: uk

03 Jul 2019, 9:03 am

I don't really like Radiohead. To be fair, I just don't listen to them.
About a year ago 'Creep' caught my ear. I got it!
I don't care whether Thom Yorke has Aspergers syndrome or not. What I do know; Is Thom Yorke( or whoever wrote the song), has seen, or felt, how I feel, but couldn't put into words/music. And, I would love to thank him, if I could, because it has helped me to explain to others, how I actually feel.

Wierdly, I think he hates singing this song. Maybe , its too close to the bone!



IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,422
Location: Chez Quis

03 Jul 2019, 9:18 am

Dnuos wrote:
Both Thom Yorke and Jonny Greenwood seem kind of aspie-ish. Not necessarily the other members of the band, but I'm sure at least one of them comes close to it. Not jumping to any conclusions, but does anyone else who listens to Radiohead get this?


I like Radiohead!

I can't say I consider their sound any more "aspie-ish" (?) than other bands of the grunge / alienation genre, though.


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles