D1nk0 wrote:
ford_prefects_kid wrote:
haha, jazz covers so much as a genre. I bet most of you who write it off have not even heard most of the styles it contains.
Um, I beg to differ. The only style of Jazz that I like is Jazz fusion from the 70s because it primarily uses synthesizers AND it blends Jazz with Funk(which I Totally dig). But for the most part I detest Jazz because other than Jazz fusion it is entirely major key and obnoxiously upbeat and has zero potential for being dark and brooding.
Thanks for the back-up Rainking and Futurecatlady- good to know I'm not the only one with a tad more exposure to jazz music.
Look dink, I like the whole 70s jazz fusion funk thing. In fact, I have danced around in my underwear to Mahavishnu Orchestra's "Sister Andrea" more times than I will ever admit to. But your all-inclusive assessment of the rest of jazz as being "entirely major key and obnoxiously upbeat" with "zero potential for being dark and brooding" is just plain wrong.
Just to name some various standards off the top of my head- "Take Five" is mostly in Gb minor with a moderate tempo, Billy Holliday is rarely upbeat ("Don't Explain" and "Gloomy Sundays" come to mind), Gershwin's Summertime (Yes, still a form of jazz) is neither major nor obnoxious, and the song "Strange Fruit"....just how more dark and brooding can you get?
Perhaps your obnoxious, overly happy impression of jazz comes from the well-known big bands of the 40s like Cab Calloway and Artie Shaw. During wartime, people wanted upbeat music- but I can understand that it's not everyone's cup of tea today.
It's a shame though- those guys put some great stuff out there, but I know not every cat is hep enough to dig that jive.