IsabellaLinton wrote:
Prometheus18 wrote:
Oh people like Heathcliff exist, no doubt, but it's the inversion of value - the inversion of morality - that's implied in having Heathcliff held up as a hero, a man of real, dynamic power - it's this that makes the novel so terrifying and diabolical.
But, who holds him as a hero? He wasn't seen as a hero in Victorian England; in fact, he was considered terrifying much like Frankenstein's monster.
Hollywood perverted the novel as a romantic love story but Heathcliff is clearly an anti-hero. None of the Hollywood images of Catherine and Heathcliff embracing outdoors in the wild are accurate. In fact, no such scene occurs in Wuthering Heights. Hollywood has propelled this novel to a false standard.
Read the novel as an expression of the 18th Century Romantic tradition (the duality of earth and heaven, man and beast), and view Heathcliff as a metaphor for jealousy and revenge. At its core, this is an ironic novel meant to question human pride.
I'm also fascinated by its concentric narrative technique, as we've discussed before.
There's something more than that. Emily herself paints a decidedly sympathetic picture of Heathcliff by making him in his own turn the victim of others' (particularly Hindley's) malevolence, as well as being a victim of the scorn of polite society, for obvious reasons.
Personally, I've not seen any of the film or other adaptations of the novel, but this is just the impression I get. She has too much insight into the workings of Heathcliff's mind not to have on some level been in sympathy with him.
Yes, if the novel serves any moral purpose at all it's as an indictment of pride in its worst sense.