No, but there's a time and a place to list your achievements.
If we're comparing our music penises, I play... *thinks* seven or eight or nine instruments, kind of depends how you look at it, and if you hand me something that's not brass I can usually figure out how to play it pretty quickly. I sing, produce, arrange, rap (yes, rap), and have sufficient artistic overflow to sustain being a solo acoustic artist, an ambient/prog artist and write for a metal band all at once. I listen to music 24/7, I write for a music website, obsess over the facts about the music I listen to, my ambition is to be a music journalist and if I lost the ability to play an instrument I would probably kill myself because I couldn't live WITHOUT music in my life.
But... I wouldn't have mentioned that otherwise, because there was no need to mention it. Hell, there was no need to mention it now other than to perhaps elevate me above the uninformed peons that you apparently think 80% of people are. And there was no need for you to mention your lists of accolades either. Feel free to correct me if there was some reason other than to make yourself feel big from other people reading it and going 'omg look how talented???' Hell, you even said 'at least I'm a talented elitist idiot!! !' in a previous post.
As for emo, trying to suggest that grunge is inherently some kind of superior movement to emo is laughable. For one thing, grunge is as worthless a term as emo was, because aside from the core Seattle bands like Mudhoney, there wasn't really a consistent grunge sound. Nirvana, Stone Temple Pilots, Screaming Trees, Soundgarden had completely different sounds. For another thing, the core grunge bands were no great shakes musically, and nor were punk, so trying to pin that accusation on emo is ridiculous, because as far as musicianship, My Chemical Romance could run rings around Nirvana. And saying that emo has no energy? You've clearly never seen any of these bands live. Even the ones I don't like put everything into their performances.