anatomical landscapes

Post Reply New Topic

had this conversation last night with a friend, anatomical landscapes are human forms, particularly focusing on the curvature of parts of men and women.


your thoughts?

like? dislike?

porn or art

im not disputing natural beauty but i personally prefer the subtle curves of a woman than a sunny glen

Outside my front door I can see the Sleeping Beauty range - it looks like a voluptuous woman laying on her back, hands crossed at her waist. I will try to get a good picture. I know it is a bit different than the close-up 'landscapes' you are describing, but interesting subject.


M.

I've seen photoshoped and painted examples of this. I have to admit to being a fan of the style.

hey monkeynoshi can i post one, its nude but it doesnt show any thing no nips no bush

Nudity taboos started largely with Queen Victoria. I mean, if people were meant to be naked, they'd be born that way. My father and I were both born wearing coats. You do have a choice!

So yes, nude human forms are beautiful, though to some degree I expect the depend on gender and orientation. That said, we must never forget how Janet Jackson's nipple corrupted an entire generation of youth.

The nudity-is-porn campaign is completely dependent on people believing that a person not wearing clothing is somehow inherently sexual in nature. I change my clothes twice a day... I must be quite the perv.

So basically, sex is sex, nudity is nudity, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

The landscapes that Bully is talking about show no objectionable parts- they are very tasteful and elegant. I hope he is allowed to post them because I think everyone will like and appreciate them.

pending a second mod approval i will be posting a pic