Cheerlessleader wrote:
I don't mind it, but I hate it when some hypocrtitical-non-conformist arsewipe goes "oh everyone likes green day/good charlotte/simple plan/Avril Lavigne so therefore they suck!"
I'm not going to say that they suck, however I will maintain that I really don't like most of the stuff that bills itself as being 'punk' these days quite simply due to the fact that I got into punk music in 1980-1981, when the scene was much smaller, much more diverse, and much more open to genuinely strange people.
Nowadays, and pretty much for the last 10-15 years it seems as if the punk scene has been dumbed down by conformity, and it seems to be a more of a contrived marketing package. --Anarchy For Sale, indeed.
Also, I think that a lot of the bigger bands suck, not because they're big, but because of the fact that after most bands get big, the quality of their music goes down. They exhaust their old material,they're no longer hungry, and their original inspiration gets waylaid by the fact that they can now afford to spend a few months getting their songs 'right' in the studio, as opposed to being poor, and having to be good enough to record an album's worth of material in the space of a few hours.
A good Proof of Concept model for this would be The Ramones. Towards the end of their career, people liked them not for the new stuff that they cranked out, but for the old stuff like Rocket To Russia. --And the Ramones made a career of essentially releasing the same album over and over again for over 20 years.
A better example of this would be Black Sabbath. People like them for the first four albums that they released, not for the Technical Ecstasy album.
_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!