Specifically George Eliot.
This isn't a smug 'oh I bet I'm grown up enough' comment.
I enjoyed Silas Marner at school.
I hated Middlemarch at uni.
Maybe the huge amount of reading which was required on my Victorian module made it so that Middlemarch's flaws, things like being "too long" and having a meandering plot were more obvious than if I took time to read it at my leisure?
Other people read a book a week. I tried to get all my reading done in the summer.
Or, people who've read both books, do you specifically find Middlemarch to be much more boring/meandering than Silas Marner?
_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him