HighLlama wrote:
I would recommend Balzac, Hawthorne, and Melville, for starters. They are stylish, but fairly concrete. Borges and Kafka, too. Raymond Chandler, if you like detective stories. Anita Brookner is economical and engaging. Junichiro Tanazaki has some great novels.
What do you like about Shakespeare if you're confused by the message?
Reading his sonnets and in general poetry is difficult for me. I'm too literal and have a hard time with allegory. I have to think about it when I read, this puts me into a single focus mindframe when I should be open. For technical, I have to read paragraphs three times, first scan, then again, and final read to find answers to any questions. As for your question, I like the old school wording and I do get it, I just don't know what "it" is that I got. Another is trust, I will always have a doubt about others intentions or meanings, as I've learned not to trust myself.
I like Raymond Chandler and he is the inspiration for most of my detective writers that I follow; Michael Connelly, Craig Johnson, CJ Box.
TY for the suggestions.
Kraichgauer wrote:
Faulkner suggested reading everything from the classics to trash. That way, you'll know the difference between good and bad writing.
So true and I remember reading the penthouse letters, talk about trash!
mohsart wrote:
How about Hemmingway, Vonnegut, and Bukowski, to name a few?
/Mats
I've read Hemmingway and he would be a great choice to dissect. TY