Fnord wrote:
A lot of what I see described as romantic behavior - glances, caresses, thoughtful gifts, clowning, silly jokes - could fall under the legal definition of Sexual Harrassment...
So the most I've been able to glean from this thread and the above Civil Rights Act, is that Romanticism somehow involves doing things that the other person welcomes.
C'mon, people! Give a clueless Aspie some help! I don't ever again want to hear the words, "For someone so smart, you can be stupid sometimes." Even when said with a smile by the woman I love, it still stings a little.
You've hit it on the head - wanted vs. unwanted attention is where the truth of the matter lies. I think that there are a couple of things a couple has to agree on if they want their relationship to survive, and the first is that they both have to have similar ideas on romanticism. If I were involved with someone who wanted to have a traditionally romantic relationship, with flowers and candlelit dinners and long walks on the beach, that someone I was involved with would be VERY disappointed, and would probably assume that the relationship was failing, because I'm not going to be willing to do any of that stuff.
Hence, although it's kinda weird, I think any couple should discuss what's expected of their time together in order for both parties to be able to properly interpret one another's behavior. I'm also very clear with people - I don't have the time or energy to try to interpret your hints, clues, and subtle body language - tell me what you want, or it's
probably never gonna happen. If having to be this explicit bothers you, I'm the wrong girl for you.
_________________
People are always trying to make me have fun. What if I don't like their fun? I'll make my own fun.