Joker wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
yes i will go look into that, thanks for the heads-up. but can you take the personal insult out what you just wrote? you're attacking the OP personally by calling him that. thank you!
Yes mam will do sorry I just hate guys like that
thanks! and the other situation was addressed. thank you for bringing it to my attention.
spongy wrote:
I guess what I was trying to say is that enough evidence has already been provided to prove OP´s misconception. OP refuses to address this evidence for several pages. Is there a point on providing more evidence that he is wrong if he wont read what you post?.
because people aren't always posting just to convince the OP of something. sometimes members want to debate their opinion with others, sometimes they want to want to convince fence-sitters to agree, sometimes they want to express themselves in more than one way, or for other reasons too.
we don't really know if he is reading the opinions, but if he does then perhaps he can at least better understand the impact of the language or content of his posts, even if he doesn't agree.
you could just as easily ask why people are arguing for 26 pages about abortion in PPR, or about Autism Speaks in Autism Politics, Activism, and Media Representation. there are many reasons, and as long as the discussion remains civil there is really no reason to discourage it.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105