Disabled Women Exposed? (controversial topic)

Page 7 of 7 [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

vilin66
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 35

31 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm

Apple_in_my_Eye wrote:
OP, if you want to make a public service announcements that says, "hey, disabled/ASD guys are people, too -- so, give them some thought and consideration," I think that would be fine. I don't think people are arguing that the situation is not unfair, but rather that expecting women to be forced into being with people who they don't like is even more unfair. If you're straight would you want to forced to have a boyfriend? That would be miserable for the both of you.

Like someone else said, above, I think guys are less well-designed to handle isolation, so this is actually a sad, ugly subject. But expecting people to be forced to be with someone who they don't want to be with is not a reasonable solution. (And, I am one of those 40yo virgins you mention, so it's not like I'm talking down from on high.)


I put alot of emphasis on disabled guys, but even your average every day normal guy is going through this. It's an epidemic. I don't call it TFL, I call it involuntary celibacy, or forced, take your pick. If a guy has to change himself for women, surely women should have to change too. One gender shouldn't have all the power. That's what I'm against. One gender holding all the cards, and gender roles.

Most women today wouldn't like it if neither gender (theirs) had all the dating and mating power.

There needs to be restrain when one gender holds all the power in crucial parts of life, otherwise you create these kinds of disasters.



Grisha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,336
Location: LA-ish

31 Oct 2011, 3:43 pm

Image



Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

31 Oct 2011, 3:53 pm

vilin66 wrote:
[. If a guy has to change himself for women, surely women should have to change too. One gender shouldn't have all the power. That's what I'm against. One gender holding all the cards, and gender roles.

Most women today wouldn't like it if neither gender (theirs) had all the dating and mating power.


When women were not allowed to support themselves (for the most part), men had all the power. That has changed and women now have the option of supportingthemselves and opting to remain alone rather than being forced into a marriage they don't want for financial reasons. So things are more even now (in some societies) than they used to be. Now people can choose to pursue relationships or to remain single.

However, anybody who chooses to pursue relationships will probably have to change some things about themselves, men and women both. It might be small things, such as changing venue (getting out to new and different places) or changing interaction style. It might be huge changes that can require therapy, such as getting treatment or depression or learning to not fear commitment. But finding and staying with another person will always require some adjustments. If nothing else, you suddenly have to take another person's feelings into consideration 24/7 and re-work your own life accordingly. That can be a really tough one for a lot of people.

What nobody has to do is change into being attracted to people they aren't attracted to. I preach the mantra of 'change your expectations' and that works to a certain extent. But only if you can find a way towards being actually attracted to the people who might want to date you. Forcing yourself to go out with somebody because "that's all you can get" just leads to misery. I think this is a place where NTs have an advantage over Aspies and why the "change your expectations" advice can sound so meaningless. NTs have an easier time changing, at least that's how it seems. Change, for NTs, is not as painful and for many it is exhilerating. But even so, there is a poster here (MetalAspie?) who managed to entirely re-invent himself and is enjoying dating success. So it must be possible. There is another poster (Aspie1, I think, it was awhile ago) who succeeded in changing his expectations and discovered happiness with plain and ugly women. That's a neat trick if you can do it. Not everybody can. But he did and improved his life. It's way back in the archives.



Women won't change into being attracted to you just for fairness. That doesn't really make any sense. Women will change things about themselves to make themselves for attractive to a man they want. If you want to be that man, you must change things about yourself too. Otherwise it is other men they will be changing for.

There are people who say, "I'd rather stay single forever than change myself". Ok. That's an option too. But re-invention is not the only type of change. Making the decision to go out more, even in the exact same clothes and with the exact same personal ways, is also change.

Go in the archives and read MetalAspuie and Nick007's posts. They have had success. Learn from their stories.



anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

31 Oct 2011, 3:57 pm

vilin66 wrote:

There needs to be restrain when one gender holds all the power in crucial parts of life, otherwise you create these kinds of disasters.


then do it. I dare you.


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


vilin66
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 35

31 Oct 2011, 5:23 pm

Janissy wrote:
vilin66 wrote:
[. If a guy has to change himself for women, surely women should have to change too. One gender shouldn't have all the power. That's what I'm against. One gender holding all the cards, and gender roles.

Most women today wouldn't like it if neither gender (theirs) had all the dating and mating power.


When women were not allowed to support themselves (for the most part), men had all the power. That has changed and women now have the option of supportingthemselves and opting to remain alone rather than being forced into a marriage they don't want for financial reasons. So things are more even now (in some societies) than they used to be. Now people can choose to pursue relationships or to remain single.

However, anybody who chooses to pursue relationships will probably have to change some things about themselves, men and women both. It might be small things, such as changing venue (getting out to new and different places) or changing interaction style. It might be huge changes that can require therapy, such as getting treatment or depression or learning to not fear commitment. But finding and staying with another person will always require some adjustments. If nothing else, you suddenly have to take another person's feelings into consideration 24/7 and re-work your own life accordingly. That can be a really tough one for a lot of people.

What nobody has to do is change into being attracted to people they aren't attracted to. I preach the mantra of 'change your expectations' and that works to a certain extent. But only if you can find a way towards being actually attracted to the people who might want to date you. Forcing yourself to go out with somebody because "that's all you can get" just leads to misery. I think this is a place where NTs have an advantage over Aspies and why the "change your expectations" advice can sound so meaningless. NTs have an easier time changing, at least that's how it seems. Change, for NTs, is not as painful and for many it is exhilerating. But even so, there is a poster here (MetalAspie?) who managed to entirely re-invent himself and is enjoying dating success. So it must be possible. There is another poster (Aspie1, I think, it was awhile ago) who succeeded in changing his expectations and discovered happiness with plain and ugly women. That's a neat trick if you can do it. Not everybody can. But he did and improved his life. It's way back in the archives.



Women won't change into being attracted to you just for fairness. That doesn't really make any sense. Women will change things about themselves to make themselves for attractive to a man they want. If you want to be that man, you must change things about yourself too. Otherwise it is other men they will be changing for.

There are people who say, "I'd rather stay single forever than change myself". Ok. That's an option too. But re-invention is not the only type of change. Making the decision to go out more, even in the exact same clothes and with the exact same personal ways, is also change.

Go in the archives and read MetalAspuie and Nick007's posts. They have had success. Learn from their stories.


Again, you say plain, ugly women. As if the reason a guy can't find a woman is because he has too high standards. This isn't true, because there are guys that look for ugly women and can't even find one because those same ugly women still hold the dating and mating power. ALL woman do. No matter what. You are missing the point, just like everyone else. Most of the guys struggling with this are not going after these super models Just AVERAGE women. And ugly ones too. And they can't even get one of THOSE women to compromise. So if the guy does his part to make himself attractive, but every woman in his country rejects him, who's fault is it? I say it's the women. Women like you tell us to go after average and ugly women, but what if even women in those categories reject you?

how is a "loser" defined? how is attractive defined? how is unattractive defined? what is considered "loser"? the people who fuel all the stereotypes out there, bred by the media and MTV, or the people who negate them and prove them wrong?

who's the real loser, the decent human being guy with good looks and a good personality who gets rejected by jessica because he's unemployed at 23, or 28 year old unemployed overweight jessica herself?

Does every male have his life figured out at 20? 30? Is every young male an entrepaneur? born from a rich family? born with good looks? born with social graces? what is "normal"?

what's considered "normal" and "good" in today's society is all artifical, fake
good is evil, and evil is good these days.

being honest gets you nowhere, being dishonest gets you nowhere either! in the end.......

what's considered good enough today for the modern female?

I don't mean to be harsh about this, because I can guarantee every guy will realize this stuff at some point in his life. There is a serious issue going on in society today with the dating scene and relationships and attraction. I'm sorry you disagree and can't see where I am coming from.

I'm one of those guys who's had no opportunities at all in the love department in life yet, I also know several in the same situation. We realize our own problems. But we know it's not only us. There's alot more to it, and I will continue to speak about it whenever I can.



Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

31 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm

I see you have figured out women's Lysistrata plan to reject all men until world peace is achieved.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,165
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

31 Oct 2011, 6:05 pm

vilin66, once you rule and impose your ..."laws", can I pick Monica Bellucci as my wife?

Send me your future system's application form.



anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

31 Oct 2011, 6:12 pm

I've been wondering which location should vilin66 occupy in order to best voice his protest against the 20% of men who get 80% of the women? :chin:

Hugh Hefner's mansion?


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

31 Oct 2011, 6:15 pm

anna-banana wrote:
I've been wondering which location should vilin66 occupy in order to best voice his protest against the 20% of men who get 80% of the women? :chin:

Hugh Hefner's mansion?


I hope so, the bunnies miss me and a protest seems like a good excuse to visit them


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

31 Oct 2011, 7:24 pm

One gender doesn't have all the power.

Just because you're desperate, does not mean the majority of men can't get anyone they like. Like I said. Many WP males have rejected girls and they have every right to. Yes "DISABLED" people in your book.

I've been rejected by a LOT of men. And no, not just "hot" and "popular" ones. I think your opinions are completely warped based on your experiences.



monkees4va
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 379
Location: Scotland

31 Oct 2011, 8:29 pm

I disagree with this concept from personal experience. All the men I've considered for a relationship or even just been attracted too have all been aspies. I can relate to them, plus they always have an individual way of looking at the world which interests me. NT's just don't get me.


_________________
I'm a girl people!
"Do or do not; there is no try." -Yoda
Your Aspie score: 157 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 65 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


Chronos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,698

01 Nov 2011, 12:18 am

vilin66 wrote:
Apple_in_my_Eye wrote:
OP, if you want to make a public service announcements that says, "hey, disabled/ASD guys are people, too -- so, give them some thought and consideration," I think that would be fine. I don't think people are arguing that the situation is not unfair, but rather that expecting women to be forced into being with people who they don't like is even more unfair. If you're straight would you want to forced to have a boyfriend? That would be miserable for the both of you.

Like someone else said, above, I think guys are less well-designed to handle isolation, so this is actually a sad, ugly subject. But expecting people to be forced to be with someone who they don't want to be with is not a reasonable solution. (And, I am one of those 40yo virgins you mention, so it's not like I'm talking down from on high.)


I put alot of emphasis on disabled guys, but even your average every day normal guy is going through this. It's an epidemic.


Sorry to burst your epidemic bubble but....
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_028.pdf

Marriage and cohabitation statistics for the US.

vilin66 wrote:
I don't call it TFL, I call it involuntary celibacy, or forced, take your pick. If a guy has to change himself for women, surely women should have to change too.


They do. It's called makeup, diets, clothes and plastic surgery.

vilin66 wrote:
One gender shouldn't have all the power. That's what I'm against. One gender holding all the cards, and gender roles.

Most women today wouldn't like it if neither gender (theirs) had all the dating and mating power.

There needs to be restrain when one gender holds all the power in crucial parts of life, otherwise you create these kinds of disasters.


With respect to relationships, one individual should have the right not to date, marry, or even be friends with someone if they don't want to. It should take one of the parties to decide not to be in a relationship, and it should take both of the parties to agree to be in a relationship.

If you can't grasp the concept that relationships are about mutual interest, then you are going to (continue to) have severe relationship troubles.