DOES ALL MALE WITH ASPERGER'S DESIRE SEX?

Post Reply New Topic

You are forgetting something.
The freaking question!

Question: Do all male with aspergers desire sex?
Answer: All male desire sex
Conclusion: All male desire sex, regardless if they have aspergers or not.

I'm not saying the premise is true, but concluding that "the one who does not desire sex is not male" because "males" are the subject in the question and asexuality is missing in the premise, is just plain stupid.

If you still continue with this absurd conclusion, then I don't know how else can I call this if not dishonesty.

I wasn't commenting on your intent, just what you actually said.
Presuming you mean what you SAY ("All male desire sex") is hardly an "absurd conclusion".

What the hell my intent has to do with it?


"All male desire sex" is hardly absurd, "All males desire sex, therefore those who don't are not males" is absurd, as well as "All males desire sex, therefore those who don't are females".

1: "Every male, aspie and NT, desire sex" makes sense as a conclusion given the context of the answer related to the question.

2. " 'Every male desire sex' ignores that there are asexuals" makes sense, but "Those who don't desire sex are not males or are females" does not. Why? The context of the answer is towards the subject, which is "males", the poster is refering to the subject because it is relevant, and there is no claim that "only males desire sex" or that he demonstrated that idea.

2A. I can presumably say that if the subject were broad to included females, the answer may have been differently because of the relevance to the subject in question, such as "all people desire sex", rather than "males" or "females" in case of females. In any case, that doesn't really matter, what matters is that the answer is relevant to the subject, which is "males".

3. The poster can very well say that you are putting words into his mouth, and he will be correct.

It's very clear, that even a small baby can understand this

It all comes down that this conclusion is idiotic, period, and by the looks of it, it seems like dishonesty to favor an ideology or because the assertion was found to be political incorrect.

I'm sorry I applied deductive reasoning to your premise and made you so emotional.




Hug?

I just hate it when people are plain dishonest, mostly when they do it to favor an ideology.

"applying deductive reasoning" yeah right, by the looks of it, your reasoning comes from a misconception in order to support an ideology or any other reason, and such reasoning simply doesn't make sense, I already told you that the premise does not indicate nor demonstrate that ONLY males do this, it ignores that the premise is LIMITED to the SUBJECT of the QUESTION which its reference has to be RELEVANT to that same question, it ignores asexuals, yes, but it does not do what you claim, your conclusion does not look to follow, it is irrelevant to the context.




What premise, that premise? it isn't mine, I just find that absurd words were put into the poster's mouth.


Yeah, why not, I just warn you that I don't have any money or wallet anywhere in my clothes, just in case

Last edited by blunnet on 20 Apr 2011, 3:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

The conclusion is obviously an irrelevant conclusion, irrelevant to the context, actually it ignores it, and this question can be made towards it: "What has that got to do with it?"

Reading all of this made me feel emotional...

I'm pretty sure all asexual men aren't actually women though I don't really know what's going on in this crazy world so I wouldn't be that surprised either way

Would it be crossing the line if say an AS type has a huge addiction to pornography and a huge collection of it? Would that be off the topic with whether all guy's with AS desire sex?

Well, I suppose it isn't mandatory, but generally it is a pretty good indicator of the health of your relationship.

perhaps you should start a new topic about it and see if you get more replies instead of resurrecting an ancient thread?.

I agree

General final answer : Not any more or any less than your average male.

/thread

I believe that sex for any other reason that procreation is illogical. Though on occasion I have been in situations when I have experienced unexpected sexual desire. Normally I have no sexual desire until a woman initiates sexual activity and even then it is difficult at first to let go of my logical state of mind concerning sex and to allow my instinctual male libido to take over. It is almost like a mental switch. I am either in logic mode or libido mode.(I have noticed that for some reason early in the morning it is easier to flip the the switch to libido) I, and I assume, some others with ASD always seem to naturally be in "logic mode". As someone with ASD even though I do have sexual desire, I think that my need for logic tends to cut off my instinctual sex drive. In contrast I think that Neurotypical people tend to have more of a need to adhere to illogical societal rules and therefore naturally tend to be in "libido mode".

I'm a male, and sex isn't really a necessity for me, just closeness. Cuddling seems very appealing to me.