hale_bopp wrote:
In regards to the op, maybe a bit.
If I brought home some socially awkward guy with no ambition my mother would waste not time in trying to get me to dump him.
It depends. Media perhaps has an input? Or women are simply not attracted to no social skills?
Yep. I think its more of a 'confidence/aggressiveness' display that is played out usually through social skills (rather than thumping our chests and howling). There are plenty of antisocial jerks that women tend to swarm over because of said display.
You had a thread where you reviewed the dating profiles of people... go take a look at women's profiles and spot the #1 thing they all are looking for...it will either be ' a guy that can have a conversation' or 'confident man'.
Moviesftw4 wrote:
Because all women are hypocrites.
Nah, its biologically wired. Normally a high degree of aggressiveness/confidence display is linked to 'good' levels of testosterone in the male. If we had no technology this feature is a highly desirable survival trait. Females of any species are generally attracted to the male that best provides the things she needs..for human females it's always been resources and safety. Since those two things can't be 'seen' on the guy the best indicator of them is that of the social display of aggressiveness/assertive(confident) behavior patterns.
In modern times the confidence part is still highly sought after since it is the one still-invisible feature. Resources you can spot on a guy easily enough and the larger the gap is between her and his resources the more likely (M>F)or less likely (F>M) she is to choose him.
After all, don't we males always go for the physical attractive ones as priority?