Live330 wrote:
Outrider wrote:
Someone who does not ascribe themselves to what I call 'the game'.
Sorry to break it to you, but every girl plays the game to some extent. It's not that girls are malicious, it's just a part of psychology in the context of supply and demand depending on the fluctuation of her "options" and the fluctuation of your perceived value/availability.
As a person deeply interested in psychology, I know exactly what you are saying.
Yes we are all unintentionally affected by psychology whether we know it or not, whether we want to or not. I've tried self-teaching myself basic 'pop' psychology, but I could never possbly prevent myself from being affected by it - only being aware that I am and what the specific things affecting me for a specific situation is. For example, I am conciously aware of when I am mirroring (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirroring_(psychology)
) another person's behavior and might even choose to avoid it (or dio it on purpose to build rapport), but I can't alwyas control it.
Anyway, thing is I am referring specifically to those women (and men) who go out of their way to play things by the book and do things the 'right way' (read: pre-established society/cultural dating rules) instead of letting things that are natural, be natural. Minor examples: 3 date rule before going exclusive, don't call them because you don't want to annoy them even if you want to contact them, blah blah etc.
Whoever said you had to go on even
one date before beginning a relationship with someone? If things were mutual, for example, a date to get to know the other person isn't always necessary in a sense - there are other ways to spend time with the other person.
Situational occurances are independent of dating/social rules, so why do some enjoy building a bridge and connecting the two unrelated ideas?