Why is it girls have an easier time getting dates than guys?

Post Reply New Topic

They are a tiny minority among feminists though, just like MRAs who hate women are a tiny minority among men. And you know this. It would be appreciated if you would stop representing them as the loud majority, because that is not the case. There is no Grand Feminist Agenda™ to wipe out men. Most of us just want to be considered people, just like men are--and to get legal recognition of that in the form of things like equal pay for equal work (as in laws that are actually enforced). That's really all there is to it. We're not out to get you.

You kept trying, eventually found a girlfriend.

Had you stopped after rejection #5 or #8 you might still be single.

Which proves my point.

Let's chalk it up to evolution. Perhaps Sly and Spiderpig's genes aren't meant to be passed along to the next generation.

I really don't get why you see the "real" feminists as evil - the real feminists are about equality, myself included. In the US, women still earn less than men for the same work/experience (after controlling for stuff like a woman taking X years out of the workforce to care for kids).

Let's use Sly as an example: he works part-time and makes minimum wage and is mad girls with stable, well-paid jobs aren't interested in dating him. Women who aren't looking for a man to be their sugar daddy, simply for a partner who is their equal.

Why should a girl compromise when there are guys out there who DO meet the reasonable standards she sets? Standards she holds HERSELF to?

I loved that one

You agreeing about something she said doesn't make it right.

In both my posts I wrote "some feminists", where do you see "loud majority"? I have nothing to say about the ones who don't annoy me with misandric stuff, I only rant at those who do that.

Can you please stop using fallacies to try to prove your points? You are trying to change the topic to something I'm not really interested in (Sly's love situation) and moreover in the past I already told him some of the things you say. Heck, I even said that you were right in some occasions! But here we are discussing about a definition, not about people. The expression "virgin not by choice" means that someone is a virgin because he was not able to find a partner, not a single one of the words of that expression have the slightest nuance of entitlement. AR1500 before finding a gf was not a virgin by choice, but because he was rejected. The act of being rejected doesn't mean that you think you are entitled to someone else's vagina, but merely that they don't want you as a partner. Do you finally understand?
Oh and Sly is not a virgin anyway.

No, her being right makes it right.

Though my agreeing with something is usually a pretty good indication that it's right.

I will make a full version of it maybe.

Of course, if she were right.

Such modesty.

Which she is, and so on and so on.



Just honesty.

It's funny. Almost definitionally, Aspies are supposed to be more intelligent and 'rational'. Yet looking through this forum, time and again the reason any given male member cannot get a girlfriend is apparently either because 1) he's just too damn nice or 2) it's the feminists, churning up the natural order, turning women against men, etc etc.

Well, I say funny. I mean bleak.

You really are obsessed with Sly aren't you..........


Nevertheless, the unemployment rate for American women is less than it is for American Men. Women on average make 78% of what a man makes for the same job. So they paygap is very much symbolic because there are millions of American women, many of them single mothers, who earn enough to make ends meet and support a family as well as themselves. So economically speaking, women really don't *need* men as breadwinners any longer.





Actually NO. Because after #9 I tried meeting women through a completely different approach that did not involve asking them out IRL. I met her through a weird printed personals and placed the add in the "Other seeking" which is for platonic and not just romantic/hookup. She left a voice msg with a phone number(twas the late 90s) and I called her, we talked, and met for coffee and initially I had no clue that it would lead to something more. It wasn't until the second time I saw her when she invited me over that one thing led to another. And the add I placed has the keyword "autistic goth" in it.

So if I had kept up the previous approach of asking people out based on their appearance I'd still be single. See? MARKET YOURSELF TO THE RIGHT PEOPLE INSTEAD OF JUST CHASING AFTER PEOPLE WHO YOU LIKE THE LOOK OF! I realized the women I was asking out showed no signs of actual romantic interest in me and really didn't have enough in common with me, let alone find me attractive. Asking someone out and getting a "yes" isn't random, it's because that person is attracted to you. If you're gonna meet women the old fashioned way by asking them out then you better know how to read body language. A lot of chicks DO NOT appreciate men hitting on them when they have not given out any nonverbal cues that they're interested.

You keep saying words but not a single argumentation.

Honesty? More like dishonesty. You two are trying to shift the topic to something I was not talking about and I even agree with you on that! But I want to believe in your honesty and think that you just didn't follow the discussion much, reread it please. Katy was accusing some guy of feeling entitled to sex just because he used the expression "virgin not by choice", which actually doesn't imply that a person feels entitled to sex. A guy who is virgin not by choice can certainly have feelings of entitlement, but they would depend more on his own douchery than on his unwanted virginity.

Getting really tired of some of the women telling lies about me on this forum.

The amount of calousness in that post is incredibly frightening.

I don't know why people seem to assume women are so picky about men. Maybe they are. I don't know many women so I can't say.

But I don't consider myself picky. I like men that are smart, and interesting, with a sense of humor, who are also genuinely nice.

What I dislike personality-wise is lying, rudeness, disrespect, laziness.

What I like physically is kind of hard to say. I like a guy in good shape, but not necessarily super muscular and fit. I like nice smile, and eyes.

I don't like men that are really overweight, bald, or have bad hygiene. A guy needs to take care of himself health-wise.

I don't think that's really picky. I don't need a tall guy, a really handsome guy, a rich guy, I don't care if he has a nice car.

I can remember from a psychology course I took in Uni that excessive characteristics of a gender stereotypes actually deters one person from the other. My family doesn't see that as an issue that I have almost no muscles, but they agree with me that bringing down my weight should be a priority. I hope that I can slim down to 200 pounds by next summer, but with me looking for a job and expecting my first child, I have no clue if I will be able to allocate enough time for fitness. No paternal leave for unemployed men like me.

Last edited by Deltaville on 02 Jan 2016, 6:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

The calorie apps and fitness apps really help me by keeping it in my mind and forcing me to track my eating habits and strength training. You'd be surprised how much easier it is once you start a habit. Even with limited time, a little effort can make a big difference.

I think so many get discouraged because it's so hard in the beginning that they give up.

I guess it depends on the standard you compare your pickiness with. As far as I know, men are generally much less picky than that when it comes to whom they're sexually attracted to. Women are attractive by default; men aren't and have to earn it. The situation is probably more balanced for serious relationships, though.