Ignore modern dating advice?
None of these things are real.
I don't even really think any of that is advice.
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
A lot of dating advice is contradictory.
On one hand, you've got people who tell you to be friends with a girl first. And on the other side of the spectrum, you've got people who will tell you that you should state your interest in a girl quickly and waiting too long to ask her out means you're likely getting friendzoned.
Some people will tell you to be proactive in your pursuit of your love. Other people will tell you not look for love and that "you'll find someone when you're not looking". Both of these are very contradictory of one another.
So what is it? Which advice is right and wrong? Well this is what I think...
The reason why a lot of dating advice is contradictory is because people tend to give advice based on what has worked for them, and not necessarily for other people. If a 21 year old hot sorority girl tells you "you'll find someone when you're not looking", the reason why she's giving you this advice is because it worked for her.
Another reason why dating advice is contradictory is because there are multiple ways to be successful in dating and find a girlfriend, not just one way. The truth is that you can be friends with a girl first, ask a girl out rather quickly, meet a girl in a bar, meet a girl at work, meet a girl online, etc... You can find a girl where looks don't matter at all, and you can find a girl where looks matter a lot. You can find a girl by being proactive and you can find a girl when you're not looking.
The point is that there isn't only one way to find a girlfriend, there are multiple ways. Find which style works best for you.
I find all of that s**t insane.
_________________
Apparently I am an INTJ-A Personality.
TriPM Score (Taken 05/22/2021):
103 out of 174 points (99th percentile)
ADHD & ASD diagnosis made in childhood.
Well the whole "alpha/beta" dichotomy is based on ideas of wolf behavior that were later debunked by the researcher who coined the terms. Human behavior and social relationships are way too complicated for someone to universally be "alpha" or "beta." Just like there are all sorts of men, there are all sorts of women and they aren't all attracted to the conventional "alpha male." As for "the friendzone," well, I believed in it growing up but it was nonsense. I never flirted or asked a girl out, so obviously girls viewed me as a friend and didn't view me romantically. It wasn't malevolent women forcing me into the friendzone. And there's nothing wrong with just being friends anyway, because you gain a friend.
I'm no expert, I mean, I've never had a romantic relationship myself, but the manosphere types are pretty clearly just misogynists.
For an autistic guy, it makes very short term difference about the alpha/beta and nice guy advice.
One piece of advice I've heard a lot is "just be yourself". This seems like advice that would work well for most NTs, as being themselves typically involves going out to social events and mingling. But for me, "being myself" usually means sitting at home reading. Going out to social events is usually an uncomfortable chore that I have to force myself to do, and when I do I'm always uncomfortable.
I also hear a lot of advice, usually from men, that seems to imply that women lack agency and simply respond favorably to any man who knows the right buttons to push. I find it rather distasteful.
The truth is that you can be friends with a girl first, ask a girl out rather quickly, meet a girl in a bar, meet a girl at work, meet a girl online, etc... You can find a girl where looks don't matter at all, and you can find a girl where looks matter a lot. You can find a girl by being proactive and you can find a girl when you're not looking.
The point is that there isn't only one way to find a girlfriend, there are multiple ways. Find which style works best for you.
I've tried all of those strategies and none of them ever worked.
Also, I'm don't know what what "where looks don't matter at all" means. There was a lady I enjoyed talking to online, but once we met in person I realized I felt no attraction to her at all. I'm sure this works in the other direction as well. Some level of physical attraction, i.e. looks, will always matter.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,033
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
I'm no expert, I mean, I've never had a romantic relationship myself, but the manosphere types are pretty clearly just misogynists.
So you want to sound scientific? Be scientifically accurate then:
Humans are primates, not canines; and the cousin ape species like Common chimps and Gorillas do have alpha/beta. Even the bonobo have them but they are way more peaceful and matriarchal. We humans are more similar to all these apes than to... wolves.
Wolves are actually way less sexually dimorphic and way more egalitarian than most primates.
We current humans are descendants from WAY fewer men than women, there’s way less diversity of Y chromosome than X.
Take a look at this:
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-r ... ve-success
Across most modern primitive tribes and across all humankind history, polygyny was and still is the most common form of polygamy.
All this leads to the conclusion that there was somehow a alpha/beta mechanism going on in humans, it doesn’t matter whether it is/was intentional or not.
Christianity and its influence was probably the greatest impact that lessened polygyny:
Ancient Hebrews did practice polygyny but it is no more legal in most Jewish circles now, even many Muslim countries which were Christians/Jewish (like Egypt, Syria, Turkey ... etc) very rarely practice polygyny because it is socially frowned upon there. India’s Hinduism had polygyny but outlawed in the 50s. In virtually all ancient Asian dynasties, marriage was a privilege for male elites only, actually it was the case in a lot of ancient cultures.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 12 Feb 2021, 2:32 am, edited 6 times in total.
nick007
Veteran
Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,594
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic police state called USA
_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
"Hear all, trust nothing"
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition
nick007
Veteran
Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,594
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic police state called USA
On one hand, you've got people who tell you to be friends with a girl first. And on the other side of the spectrum, you've got people who will tell you that you should state your interest in a girl quickly and waiting too long to ask her out means you're likely getting friendzoned.
Some people will tell you to be proactive in your pursuit of your love. Other people will tell you not look for love and that "you'll find someone when you're not looking". Both of these are very contradictory of one another.
So what is it? Which advice is right and wrong? Well this is what I think...
The reason why a lot of dating advice is contradictory is because people tend to give advice based on what has worked for them, and not necessarily for other people. If a 21 year old hot sorority girl tells you "you'll find someone when you're not looking", the reason why she's giving you this advice is because it worked for her.
Another reason why dating advice is contradictory is because there are multiple ways to be successful in dating and find a girlfriend, not just one way. The truth is that you can be friends with a girl first, ask a girl out rather quickly, meet a girl in a bar, meet a girl at work, meet a girl online, etc... You can find a girl where looks don't matter at all, and you can find a girl where looks matter a lot. You can find a girl by being proactive and you can find a girl when you're not looking.
The point is that there isn't only one way to find a girlfriend, there are multiple ways. Find which style works best for you.
_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
"Hear all, trust nothing"
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,033
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Also, I'm don't know what what "where looks don't matter at all" means. There was a lady I enjoyed talking to online, but once we met in person I realized I felt no attraction to her at all. I'm sure this works in the other direction as well. Some level of physical attraction, i.e. looks, will always matter.
I think for a lot of people, looks do matter. Your physical appearance affects how other people perceive you, especially initially. Your level of attractiveness also has a big factor on whether or not someone perceives you as a potential romantic partner. This should be fairly obvious. Do you have to be good looking to find a partner? No. But being good looking will make it easier simply because you get more romantic opportunities and a higher percentage of people find you attractive.
The less physically attractive you are, the more you have to compensate for it. If you're very unattractive, you better be bringing something else to the table, whether that's high intelligence, a good paying job, very strong social skills, etc...A poor and overweight guy with crap social skills and still lives with mom and dad is going to struggle tremendously. Think about Skippy, the 40 year old virgin. (Go on Youtube and look him up) There's plenty of guys who are ugly like Skippy who do fine with women; they're married and have kids, but that's because they bring something else to the table. Skippy doesn't...
So you want to sound scientific? Be scientifically accurate then:
Humans are primates, not canines; and the cousin ape species like Common chimps and Gorillas...
Does any of this mean that, say, Roosh V has a dating strategy rooted in accurate (to our current understanding) models of human behavior? When manosphere vloggers talk about alphas and betas they are thinking of wolves, they are not biologists, they are using a pop science term. Do you really think pick up artists who guarantee that you can get any woman "with this one simple trick" or by taking one of their expensive classes isn't just creating a horribly reductive model of human relationships for profit and influence? Even the beta chimps still had sex. The experts just don't seem to use the terms "alpha" and "beta" to describe humans. As dorkseid said, a lot of this stuff reads like a button pushing game where you present alpha with a handful of set behaviors and then the woman, bound by her instincts, can't help but fall for you. People don't talk about male sexuality that way.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,033
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
So you want to sound scientific? Be scientifically accurate then:
Humans are primates, not canines; and the cousin ape species like Common chimps and Gorillas...
Does any of this mean that, say, Roosh V has a dating strategy rooted in accurate (to our current understanding) models of human behavior? When manosphere vloggers talk about alphas and betas they are thinking of wolves, they are not biologists, they are using a pop science term. Do you really think pick up artists who guarantee that you can get any woman "with this one simple trick" or by taking one of their expensive classes isn't just creating a horribly reductive model of human relationships for profit and influence? Even the beta chimps still had sex. The experts just don't seem to use the terms "alpha" and "beta" to describe humans. As dorkseid said, a lot of this stuff reads like a button pushing game where you present alpha with a handful of set behaviors and then the woman, bound by her instincts, can't help but fall for you. People don't talk about male sexuality that way.
No, their advise is rubbish.
I was more nitpicking the your wolf part which is irrelevant to humans really.
The “alpha/beta” is not debunked for primares, it is only debunked for wolves.
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Dating Advice |
16 Sep 2024, 4:12 pm |
Old-timey newscasts vs. modern news |
13 Sep 2024, 1:38 am |
10 Old "Creature Features" That Deserve A Modern Remake |
31 Aug 2024, 10:28 pm |
Men on Dating Sites |
27 Aug 2024, 8:04 pm |