0_equals_true wrote:
please direct me to where I personally attacked you. I I called you over dramatic no doubt you would add that to your list to.You called me passive aggressive, which would mean you doubt my sincerity. I not that bothered, but it shows you don't really know me all that well, as i pretty strait to the point in telling people what I think about them.
I've already done that - these are your words:
"I'm pretty neutral on this, I them we can give Seanmw the benefit of the doubt on this. I think it is human nature to attention seek to some extent. I think some of the comments are more than a little
hypocritical. I am bemused at HopeGrows point after the game set and match remark. Confused
I think there are too many people just trying to make a point. It is perfectly possible for people to mess up once an a while, it doesn't men they should be
crucified for it. Seanmw will learn from his mistakes."
"Well that is hardly clear is it? Especially the bit about being surprised to hear yourself saying it.
Sounds more like U-Turn to me, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt."
"Playing devil's advocate is uncomfortable have to admit as Seanmw messed up in my view, however he doesn't desive a
which hunt form people who are no better than him."
And
NO actually, I didn't make things personal before then. Sorry - that didn't happen. I supported my opinion without insulting or degrading you. I responded to Seanmw by supporting my opinion without degrading him. And really, just as soon as you get freaking tag-teamed by a string of posters hurling insults because they don't support your opinion, you can react whatever way you'd like. If you think this discourse has been civil, I don't.
_________________
What you feel is what you are and what you are is beautiful...
Last edited by HopeGrows on 18 Mar 2010, 5:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.