Women who find muscles attractive!

Page 8 of 12 [ 177 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

04 Mar 2013, 2:25 pm

1000Knives wrote:
I still wish some women would answer my question about the weightlifter physique vs bodybuilding one. How about gymnasts, do women here think gymnasts are hot?

you should start a poll with lots of options or something. for me, i've been told at least 26 times that my preferences are atypical so i don't think my input is really necessary, but i am sure other women would like to offer opinions.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


aspiesandra27
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 825
Location: london

04 Mar 2013, 2:25 pm

MXH I don't know what you look like, but guess what?

Your mind turns me on big time.

How's that for a spanner in the works?



Wolfheart
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,971
Location: Kent, England

04 Mar 2013, 3:07 pm

Well done, there are prejudice people in every society, it doesn't mean that the society is prejudice itself. I've never claimed any opener or technique is flawless, there are so many factors i'm attraction that what works for one person might not work for another.

I have had more success with women in the past year than my entire life and i'm staying over my girlfriends house at the end of the weekdo so I might well have a relationship with a hot girl on my hands.



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

04 Mar 2013, 3:33 pm

1000Knives wrote:
I still wish some women would answer my question about the weightlifter physique vs bodybuilding one. How about gymnasts, do women here think gymnasts are hot?


What weight class are we talking about? Both these men are professional powerlifters, in two different weight classes:

Image

Image



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

04 Mar 2013, 3:39 pm

MXH wrote:
That first paragraph is funny as hell. First it glorifies one nation (yours) then you go and bash another nation and then hope they stop being prejudiced. Considering you just did a lot of prejudiced bashing yourself. Look whos advanced now.


The US elected both G.W. Bush and Barack Obama twice. Neither were good presidents. They also attacked Bill Clinton (the best post WWII president they've had) for a blowjob, which he (quite frankly) deserved. Seems like Lewinsky was the only one to ever thank him for the strong dollar, the balanced budget, the high rate of home ownership or the low unemployment.

Quote:
So a place that has been a theocracy for most of its existence and which still has a singular diety in charge is the best democracy?


Look into what a European monarch actually does. The queen of Great Britain has little to no formal power. Her duty is to represent the country and be the head of state, not to lead the government as the head of government. Most European monarchs have advanced university degrees and also work in other jobs apart from being the head of state as well.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

04 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm

It's fine if you waffled and changed your mind on how things work, but don't pretend that's not what you were saying before. It makes it sound like talking to a politician ad makes everything you say now seem like BS. And this goes far beyond your conversation right now. You first talk of being very tall, then said you were 6'5 with boots, not long after you we're 6'2 and now you say you're 6'0. How can anyone trust your word when you can't even be honest about your height?



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

04 Mar 2013, 4:33 pm

Kurgan wrote:
MXH wrote:
That first paragraph is funny as hell. First it glorifies one nation (yours) then you go and bash another nation and then hope they stop being prejudiced. Considering you just did a lot of prejudiced bashing yourself. Look whos advanced now.


The US elected both G.W. Bush and Barack Obama twice. Neither were good presidents. They also attacked Bill Clinton (the best post WWII president they've had) for a blowjob, which he (quite frankly) deserved. Seems like Lewinsky was the only one to ever thank him for the strong dollar, the balanced budget, the high rate of home ownership or the low unemployment.

Quote:
So a place that has been a theocracy for most of its existence and which still has a singular diety in charge is the best democracy?


Look into what a European monarch actually does. The queen of Great Britain has little to no formal power. Her duty is to represent the country and be the head of state, not to lead the government as the head of government. Most European monarchs have advanced university degrees and also work in other jobs apart from being the head of state as well.


Which is the same job as the president. Did you even bother reading how I said they used to be. The president is also but a head of state, the president has only talking power. Especially when a congress can overthrow a veto.

But having a head of state is why we don't have a true democracy. Especially with the funky ways these people are elected.

And now we are fully offtopic



1000Knives
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,036
Location: CT, USA

04 Mar 2013, 4:36 pm

Kurgan wrote:
1000Knives wrote:
I still wish some women would answer my question about the weightlifter physique vs bodybuilding one. How about gymnasts, do women here think gymnasts are hot?


What weight class are we talking about? Both these men are professional powerlifters, in two different weight classes:

Image

Image


Aiming for 77k. Right now I'm 182lbs with probably 13%? bodyfat, so I figure to get to where my abs show nicely I'll be sitting at 175 or so, and then for a meet cut water weight and refeed/hydrate. At 182 right now I fit into USAPL/IPF 181 class, but OL lifting is 77, 85, 94. So if I do PL I'll be 82, OL I'd fit right by a hair into 77, PL I'd not be able to go to 75k I don't think, at least not safely/reasonably comfortably. I don't wish to/can't go all 300lb superheavy if I wanna still ice skate, which I do. If I ever got huge, I'd probably wanna look like Dmitry Klokov. I'm only 5'9 though, too.

This isn't bad considering where I started, my 180 1.5 years ago was definitely a lot more BF than this one, so I'd say it's successful. I don't train for hypertrophy, nor do I eat a gazillion grams of protein a day or anything (I'm lucky if I simply have meat) so yeah.

And 77k, the ideal physique as I showed a couple pages back, Lu Xiaojun. It'd be sweet to look like him.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,123
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

04 Mar 2013, 4:42 pm

1000Knives wrote:
I still wish some women would answer my question about the weightlifter physique vs bodybuilding one. How about gymnasts, do women here think gymnasts are hot?


There are fans for each category.

But the most commonly liked is the swimmer-build, not so overly-muscled yet well ripped. Gymnasts look similar to swimmers I guess.



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

04 Mar 2013, 4:51 pm

MXH wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
MXH wrote:
That first paragraph is funny as hell. First it glorifies one nation (yours) then you go and bash another nation and then hope they stop being prejudiced. Considering you just did a lot of prejudiced bashing yourself. Look whos advanced now.


The US elected both G.W. Bush and Barack Obama twice. Neither were good presidents. They also attacked Bill Clinton (the best post WWII president they've had) for a blowjob, which he (quite frankly) deserved. Seems like Lewinsky was the only one to ever thank him for the strong dollar, the balanced budget, the high rate of home ownership or the low unemployment.

Quote:
So a place that has been a theocracy for most of its existence and which still has a singular diety in charge is the best democracy?


Look into what a European monarch actually does. The queen of Great Britain has little to no formal power. Her duty is to represent the country and be the head of state, not to lead the government as the head of government. Most European monarchs have advanced university degrees and also work in other jobs apart from being the head of state as well.


Which is the same job as the president. Did you even bother reading how I said they used to be. The president is also but a head of state, the president has only talking power. Especially when a congress can overthrow a veto.

But having a head of state is why we don't have a true democracy. Especially with the funky ways these people are elected.

And now we are fully offtopic


The president serves as both the head of government and head of state (essentially as both the monarch and the prime minister at the same time). The president is the leader of the government, but just like the CEO is responsible if the board of directors f*ck something up, the president is also partially to blame for mistakes made by his cabinet.

A direct democracy doesn't work in any country larger than Finland, hence an indirect democracy is needed.



Hero
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 141

04 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm

Wolfheart wrote:
periphery wrote:
I live in Australia, and aside from the healthcare thing (which I was primarly referring to private healthcare, in Australia we have Government funded healthcare too but more wealthy people still have a preference for private insurance because the treatment is faster and often better), what you just posted as nothing to do with increasing the earning capacity for people who work in trades. We are talking about an employed trades person verses someone that works in tertiary industry. Unemployment benefits and other social security benefits has no bearing on the earning capacity of either. Except that trades people may get better tax breaks, because they earn less.


I don't know what you are referring towards but people who earn over £35'000 a year have to pay 40% tax so if even you earned £50'000 a year, you would only see about £30'000 a year. Even if a tradesman charge £15 an hour and works an 8 hour day, that's between £700-800 a week depend on if he works 5 or 6 days.

So let's work it out.
Average Businessman who earns £50'000 a year, 40% tax = £30'000
Average Tradesman who earns just under £35'000 a year, 20% tax = £28'000
Tradesman who works 6 days a week, £40'000, 40% tax = £20'000

The tradesman who works five days a week is better off than the tradesman that works six days a week.


Before anything...this seems to be a terrible misunderstanding on how taxes work. I may not live in the UK, but most modern nations have a pretty consistent basis for how they handle the bottomline of taxes.

I don't know what the exact tax bracketts are at each interval up to 35k a year, so we will simply ignore that and assume a 20% tax below threshold.

The overall tax structure for each of these three individuals should look like this:

35k @ 20% + 15k @ 40% = 28k + 9k = 37k
35k @ 20% = 28k
35k @ 20% + 5k @ 40% = 28k + 3k = 31k

If the UK is not using this method for taxes(which I doubt...given that even in the US people seem to know Jack about how taxes actually work. Therefore, it is likely the same in UK) then they need to rewrite the tax law. I am also purposely avoiding deductibles and everything else associated with tax law that could further complicate the issue.

--------------------------

Moving on to something more thread related:

This thread reeks of ego and insecurity. Given some of your past threads and responses, I thought this might have merely been a troll thread. Having read through the discussion, I seem to have misjudged the situation. There has always been a love for both Beautiful men and Big muscled men. This is not recent at all.

Additionally, the sheer amount of bad information being thrown around in this thread is mindboggling. Furthermore, the appearance of strength/ability correlating with actual strength/ability is awful. I will only say a few things:

Olympic athlete average weight and Bmi...and Sasuke Yuuji Urushihara. Sasuke in general works well too. As most of the athletes who do well tend to be of average build with low Fat ratio. If you watch all the sasuke videos...athletes who are body builders or weigh too much tend to fail specifically because they cannot control their own weight or lack the stamina as the weight wears on them throughout the course. If there is any competition that accurately shows strength(power) to weight ratio...it is Sasuke.



Wrackspurt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 733

04 Mar 2013, 6:17 pm

You know a young body doesn't last forever. What if you rip, break or snap something and end up that you can't lift weights anymore? If you attract a superficial girl what happens when both your looks go? What do you have then?

You need to work on the mind just as much as the body.

Maybe look into talking to a professional?



Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

04 Mar 2013, 6:49 pm

Hot:
Image

Still doable:
Image

NOT:
Image



Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

04 Mar 2013, 6:52 pm

Arnold S. is WAY too much.

And Bieber could use a little bit of abs



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

04 Mar 2013, 7:17 pm

Image
This is how I see that a guy would be attractive. Toned but not actually bulked and with the right face for the body



Cafeaulait
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,539
Location: Europe

04 Mar 2013, 8:29 pm

MXH wrote:
Image
This is how I see that a guy would be attractive. Toned but not actually bulked and with the right face for the body


He´s doable, yeah. Not THAT special or attractive. The face is a 7- 7,5.