Would you ever date a fat or obese person?

Page 8 of 18 [ 278 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 18  Next

Pageognat
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jun 2010
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 116
Location: Florida

31 Mar 2013, 11:27 pm

I don't think I could date a fat girl. If I ever met a heavy girl who exemplified enough positive traits to make me love her, great, then I would date her, but I've never met a girl like that and have no reason to think I will.

I always saw "lowering your standards" as overall demeaning to both parties. I view attractiveness as entirely subjective, and therefore someone I find unattractive is not, in the grand scheme of things, inferior, just different. So, am a believer in "someone for everyone," so there's no need to bend yourself to force yourself to like someone. In a relationship with me, both parties would have to find the other attractive, since I don't agree with telling a girl you think she's pretty if she's not (to you). It kind of goes like this:

A. People who are in love don't lie to each other.
B. People who are in love can trust each other to make them feel attractive.

You can't do A and B unless you're with someone you genuinely think is attractive. For me, that means thin (along with other things).

If I get lucky, I'll meet a thin girl who's one of those "inner beauty" people, since I'm not fat, but I'm not really attractive, either. For me, inner beauty is only half of the package, but it's a legitimate way of looking at things to ignore physical attributes. Frankly, I admire people like that. They're doing something I never could.


_________________
This post has been Pageognat-approved.


Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

31 Mar 2013, 11:35 pm

Lintar wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
Lintar wrote:
This may be slightly off-topic here, but all of this talk about pounds, inches, feet and so on is completely meaningless to me. The entire world now uses the (modern, logical and sensible) metric system - except the United States. :roll: This is a website that can be accessed by anyone on the planet, so I'm asking for just one favour here; could we (i.e. the rest of the world outside U.S. borders) have the amount(s) in brackets next to every mention of an imperial unit of measurement?


No. If I was going to do that, I could just learn the metric system. but the metric system is completely meaningless to me in my every day life, so I see no reason to do it just to suit you.


No, not just 'for me', but for everyone else who uses a system that is used for both official and unofficial purposes across the world, recognised as being the default system by that world, and who actually lives in the 21st century rather than the 17th.


Just Google it!
Or, for reference: a pound is about 2.2 kilos.
An inch is 2.54cm.
A foot is approximately 30cm; I can't remember the exact measurement.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


rabbittss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,348

31 Mar 2013, 11:36 pm

Lintar wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
Lintar wrote:
This may be slightly off-topic here, but all of this talk about pounds, inches, feet and so on is completely meaningless to me. The entire world now uses the (modern, logical and sensible) metric system - except the United States. :roll: This is a website that can be accessed by anyone on the planet, so I'm asking for just one favour here; could we (i.e. the rest of the world outside U.S. borders) have the amount(s) in brackets next to every mention of an imperial unit of measurement?


No. If I was going to do that, I could just learn the metric system. but the metric system is completely meaningless to me in my every day life, so I see no reason to do it just to suit you.


No, not just 'for me', but for everyone else who uses a system that is used for both official and unofficial purposes across the world, recognised as being the default system by that world, and who actually lives in the 21st century rather than the 17th.


and with that attitude I vote you be placed into a hogshead and rolled down a steep incline with a high fractioned slope.



IlovemyAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2012
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,030
Location: Alone

31 Mar 2013, 11:45 pm

Let's take this to another level?? For those attracted to the 2's and 3's. What happens when they turn into the 5+ range?
@rabittss thanks for that visual. :lol:



Last edited by IlovemyAspie on 31 Mar 2013, 11:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Lintar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,777
Location: Victoria, Australia

31 Mar 2013, 11:46 pm

rabbittss wrote:
and with that attitude I vote you be placed into a hogshead and rolled down a steep incline with a high fractioned slope.


What 'attitude'? I don't see anything wrong with the point(s) I made regarding this issue. I was simply pointing out that the civilised world has moved on from doing things the way they were done 400 or so years ago. What's the problem?



IlovemyAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2012
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,030
Location: Alone

31 Mar 2013, 11:50 pm

Lintar wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
and with that attitude I vote you be placed into a hogshead and rolled down a steep incline with a high fractioned slope.


What 'attitude'? I don't see anything wrong with the point(s) I made regarding this issue. I was simply pointing out that the civilised world has moved on from doing things the way they were done 400 or so years ago. What's the problem?


The problem is that we the "stone age people" don't appreciate your negative remarks. And with each post you continue to insult us. Look, you're not going to get your "humble" request for metric conversion. We have made suggestions. Take them or leave them but stop with the insults.



Northeastern292
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,159
Location: Brooklyn, NY/Catskills

01 Apr 2013, 12:01 am

Probably not someone grotesquely obese, but I've met some girls over the years that despite being a little overweight are actually quite attractive, and make up their weight with having a more attractive overall physique and face than some girls of regular/below normal weight.

Of course, body weight is not a big deal for me, it's self-esteem that counts. So, body weight, except in extremes, does not make a deal breaker in the dating department.



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

01 Apr 2013, 12:06 am

hyperlexian wrote:
1. which one of these bodies qualifies as obese in your opinion (not morbidly obese, just obese)?

2. which one is the biggest size you would date?

Image

1. I'd call 8 and above obese, and I'd call 7 fat and 6 slightly overweight.
2. The biggest size I would date would probably be a 6, but possibly a 7. I'd also struggle to date below a 3.



IlovemyAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2012
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,030
Location: Alone

01 Apr 2013, 12:11 am

yellowtamarin wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
1. which one of these bodies qualifies as obese in your opinion (not morbidly obese, just obese)?

2. which one is the biggest size you would date?

Image

1. I'd call 8 and above obese, and I'd call 7 fat and 6 slightly overweight.
2. The biggest size I would date would probably be a 6, but possibly a 7. I'd also struggle to date below a 3.


One of the most constructive post I've seen. Thank you for that.



Pageognat
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jun 2010
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 116
Location: Florida

01 Apr 2013, 12:19 am

yellowtamarin wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
1. which one of these bodies qualifies as obese in your opinion (not morbidly obese, just obese)?

2. which one is the biggest size you would date?

Image

1. I'd call 8 and above obese, and I'd call 7 fat and 6 slightly overweight.
2. The biggest size I would date would probably be a 6, but possibly a 7. I'd also struggle to date below a 3.

1. Eight and above would be obese to me. Six and above is overweight.
2. My acceptable range would be between two and four.


_________________
This post has been Pageognat-approved.


BlueMax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,285

01 Apr 2013, 12:25 am

Pageognat wrote:
1. Eight and above would be obese to me. Six and above is overweight.
2. My acceptable range would be between two and four.


What size would you rate yourself?



Pageognat
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jun 2010
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 116
Location: Florida

01 Apr 2013, 12:29 am

BlueMax wrote:
Pageognat wrote:
1. Eight and above would be obese to me. Six and above is overweight.
2. My acceptable range would be between two and four.


What size would you rate yourself?

Two.


_________________
This post has been Pageognat-approved.


rabbittss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,348

01 Apr 2013, 12:29 am

Lintar wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
and with that attitude I vote you be placed into a hogshead and rolled down a steep incline with a high fractioned slope.


What 'attitude'? I don't see anything wrong with the point(s) I made regarding this issue. I was simply pointing out that the civilised world has moved on from doing things the way they were done 400 or so years ago. What's the problem?


I would hardly call most of the countries who use the Metric system, Civilized.

Certainly, regardless of your opinion, the USA is FAR more civilized than say.. Somalia.. or Rawanda.. or Burma. We get by just fine thanks.

You're attitude is that we're "Wrong" when there really isn't any major difference in the value or ability to use either system. Both work just fine. And neither is more or less intuitive to learn if you're trying to learn it in a place where it's not used.

If I went to the grocery tomorrow, and asked for a kilo of grapes, no one would have a freaking clue what I was talking about. No reason to learn it, and the very fact that "The civilized world" is constantly on about the US being uncivilized for not switching.. is only going to make people respond exactly the way I did. we will say no, and dig in our heals and for another 400 years won't swap over. The only way to get us to swap is to STOP BADGERING and let the free market (thanks coke and pepsi!) do it for you, subtly.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

01 Apr 2013, 12:29 am

7+ obese, would date from 2-5, myself a 2



BlueMax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,285

01 Apr 2013, 12:41 am

rabbittss wrote:
If I went to the grocery tomorrow, and asked for a kilo of grapes, no one would have a freaking clue what I was talking about. No reason to learn it, and the very fact that "The civilized world" is constantly on about the US being uncivilized for not switching.. is only going to make people respond exactly the way I did. we will say no, and dig in our heals and for another 400 years won't swap over. The only way to get us to swap is to STOP BADGERING and let the free market (thanks coke and pepsi!) do it for you, subtly.


Oh shush. :roll:

Here in (apparently uncivilized) Canada, we use both measurements regularly due to the close proximity of our American neighbours who are the last ones on Earth to still use weird units of measure that involve "3 of this make one of that" "12 of these make 1 of that" "7 of this makes a peck and bushel of that, but only every other tuesday."

:twisted:



IlovemyAspie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2012
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,030
Location: Alone

01 Apr 2013, 12:46 am

BlueMax wrote:
rabbittss wrote:
If I went to the grocery tomorrow, and asked for a kilo of grapes, no one would have a freaking clue what I was talking about. No reason to learn it, and the very fact that "The civilized world" is constantly on about the US being uncivilized for not switching.. is only going to make people respond exactly the way I did. we will say no, and dig in our heals and for another 400 years won't swap over. The only way to get us to swap is to STOP BADGERING and let the free market (thanks coke and pepsi!) do it for you, subtly.


Oh shush. :roll:

Here in (apparently uncivilized) Canada, we use both measurements regularly due to the close proximity of our American neighbours who are the last ones on Earth to still use weird units of measure that involve "3 of this make one of that" "12 of these make 1 of that" "7 of this makes a peck and bushel of that, but only every other tuesday."

:twisted:


Oh BlueMax not you too....smh .....It works for us.