Girl dates me for being nice to her: Matrix glitch report.

Post Reply New Topic

Yup . . . Larry was hilarious.

My sister did this. Dated the biggest douchiest boyfriend of all time who lived in my house for like 2-3 months, did drugs, was kicked out of school and had no HS diploma even, etc. After a bad breakup where he threatened to kill himself, she goes and dates a slightly effeminate "nice guy" who has very few friends, is fat, and has (comparatively) lots of money and a car.

So just so you know. I mean they're still together and stuff. But yes, this glitch can be encountered sometimes when you're young, but usually it happens more when the girl is 30+, has gained like 30-40lbs, maybe has a kid, and finally wants a nice boring guy who won't beat her or something.

Thankfully this is irrelevant for me because I look good now. I just gotta figure out how to connect the dots after girls are staring at me and saying hi. But I got like 80% done.

Well good luck, hope you stay together and stuff. Nice job on the glitch.

Who are you calling c**t? I am confused.

And what you are gonna do if you catch her talking to her ex bf? hm

I preferred playing Fallout with the ladies man perk tho.

Leave her.

I think "he" is actually a she (i.e. Einsteinologist is female).

Oh. Well that makes her paranoia seem even more out of touch with reality.

...and the mods are after ME for "inappropriate posts"?

Your snobbish typicality doesn't belong on this site, "hun."

Just to clarify, it's not "paranoia" - it's based in the scientific facts of the current stupidity displayed in this thread. Believe what you want, but the most sane Droids are the most-easily antagonized. Teehee.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEolSjlcqng[/youtube]

This is amazing advice, if you're the writer for a Japanese H-pr0n company anyway.

Im sorry, i laughed for a good 5 minutes. Was this intentional?

Last edited by LeLetch on 02 Oct 2013, 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Lolwut? I think this might be more sarcasm from Shau.

As for... nah... not touching non-consent convo. The glitch in the matrix is Shau.

A note tho, i think we do better with people from other cultures, as we do not identify fully with our own. Birds of a feather flock together.

Glitch explained?

No, I don't mean anything bad or contrary to things I've previously said - I'm just hashing out a lot of nonsense as a result of a really nasty court case. This magnetic n testosterone-driven thread is antagonizing the HELL outta me... ...and quite frankly creating more.

Actually yes I'm seeing that some advertising and displaying is quite clever in its ability to add positively to previously-negative messages. So with regard to telepathic mirroring I do not feel threatened, because I have a choice further removed from the power source. Perhaps that means I'm cordless by nature? Also, I don't dislike consent in and of itself, but being as magnetic as I feel to be, the multi-focal reactions within my immediate field yield the sensation of 'will tampering', thus causing the perception of predation as a result of the learning that occurs when new messages are received at the same time as older ones are done away with. I suppose one can not survive without being completely un-brainwashed or existence would cease. Correct me where I am wrong - I don't find your dealings too harsh because they are directly addressed in the same manner rather than spoken as third-person 404s.

Interesting... no I'm not opposed to initiation in the context of trust. Perhaps that is the problem - broken trust. Is that a broken wire? That would explain the discomfort - that, and the suggestion that 'trust' is re-wired properly by a physical relationship as an attempt at justifying previous random encounters between individuals unknown to each other, which are not for me to justify because if they happen they happen, and they are not in need of justification. Yes, this is "overthinking", based in scientific fact of encoded memory stimulated by the pressure of the natural learning process. It is this natural learning process initiated by predatory thinkers that was the catalyst for what non-professionals are labeling "paranoia" - a catch-all term used by those less vigilant to the laws of the universe.
Even if the mind is only "cooking up crap", the crap can not be uncooked as easily, just as toast can not be turned back into bread.
(Peanut-butter anyone?)

In truth my last sentence in the previous post disturbed me as well, as many in my court case have been trying to get ME to be the predator instead by suggesting that I initiate in one context and not another, which could possibly leave the other party feeling like the complainant. That is why it must be clear if two parties are interested, otherwise it is actually possible for someone to be half-raped, ESPECIALLY if one has a Pervasive Developmental Disorder wherein social maturity is of multiple natures. I can speak for Myself.

That is precisely why consent is so blurry nowadays, when children are coming into this world more aware of problems and more capable of repairing them than are the parents who bore them - and thus they are more vulnerable across the lifespan. That is also why over-simplifying the truthfully complex is dangerously provoking, harmful to the spirit, and severely trust-breaking - right down to the neurons!

I am forced to "overthink" because that is how I was programmed in the womb. Pardon any difficulty ascertaining.

Goodbye.

Interceptor... tear the throat out of Ctrl_F4 for exemplifying the true definition of an IDIOT.

Operating under the assumption that Einsteinologist has described consent beautifully, it should be made into a test.

I would fail the test.

Most dudes would fail the test, (women too).

A solution to overpopulation?

I got lost a long time ago. Consent is guesswork unless someone verbally states consent, then its still guesswork as to whether they are of sound mind. I ask for consent more literally than most NT's i assume. My social guesswork has an iffy track record compared to NT's. I think this discussion dissolved into a morality debate. Which is opinion based.

Opinion X Guesswork to the power 3 = Ugh, i dunno. And yes, i consider this a logical conclusion.

You seem to be in the 'nearly all sex is rape' cult/club.

Predator, initiator, whatever - SOMEONE out of two people has to make their intentions known or no-one would ever have sex. If you make your intentions known, and you are rejected, where's the harm? It feels like you are ashamed of expressing your sexuality. Back off when told to, advance when allowed to, and all is good.

How can you be "half-raped"? That like being a bit pregnant? Or being slightly dead?

As a woman, you initiating would make you VERY popular among the guys here.