Can I really get a "hot" girl?
Well, now you're mixing together shy and insecure and helpless (and even nerdy got thrown in there).
Are we talking level of social outgoing-ness (shy vs. outgoing), or are we talking about insecurity/lack of confidence, or are we talking about helplessness vs. competence, or are we talking nerdy vs. jocky? None of those are at all the same thing.
Maybe what I'm trying to describe is wanting someone to have a well-developed sense of who they are, and maybe that is something that only comes with age and experience. But I do remember that, even in middle school and high school, I was always attracted to the geeky shy guys who were comfortable with themselves and didn't give a rat's ass about what other people thought of them. They were openly geeky, nerdy, or weird (or super-intelligent, which in high school was considered much less desirable than being one of the jocks). Non-mainstream, in other words. And guys who have the confidence to be exactly who they are and not feel the need to conform with whatever the fad du jour might be, are HOT. Even if they're shy on the surface.
This is why I don't get the whole PUA thing - it's encouraging men to all conform with that brash, cocky, jock (or "bad boy") stereotype. And I seriously don't get the women who are attracted to that sort of façade.
I MUCH prefer shy men over outgoing ones, but I still like a man to have enough sense of self to know his strengths and weaknesses, and to capitalize on the former. His strength may be in mathematics, or playing chess, or doing crossword puzzles, or styling hair, or interior design - they don't all have to be chest-beating "manly men."
the problem with shy men is they don't talk [they avoid serious discussions). So if there's a problem in the relationship, guess what's not getting discussed?
The thing I've found about shy people (me being one of them) is that when they get comfortable with someone (or get onto a topic that is of interest to them), they open up and can be some of the most talkative people you'll ever meet. That's what I refer to when I say "shy" - maybe what you're describing is more like insecurity?
I MUCH prefer shy men over outgoing ones, but I still like a man to have enough sense of self to know his strengths and weaknesses, and to capitalize on the former. His strength may be in mathematics, or playing chess, or doing crossword puzzles, or styling hair, or interior design - they don't all have to be chest-beating "manly men."
the problem with shy men is they don't talk [they avoid serious discussions). So if there's a problem in the relationship, guess what's not getting discussed?
if shy men are anything like shy women, then this isn't necessarily true: for example, i'm generally pretty shy and not very talkative with people i don't know well, but once i know someone well i can (and usually do) talk about just about everything under the sun, including my feelings and lots of "serious" topics. unless the word "shy" has more definitions than i'm aware of, being so doesn't preclude anyone from being able to discuss important topics with people they are close to, including romantic relationships.
I MUCH prefer shy men over outgoing ones, but I still like a man to have enough sense of self to know his strengths and weaknesses, and to capitalize on the former. His strength may be in mathematics, or playing chess, or doing crossword puzzles, or styling hair, or interior design - they don't all have to be chest-beating "manly men."
the problem with shy men is they don't talk [they avoid serious discussions). So if there's a problem in the relationship, guess what's not getting discussed?
if shy men are anything like shy women, then this isn't necessarily true: for example, i'm generally pretty shy and not very talkative with people i don't know well, but once i know someone well i can (and usually do) talk about just about everything under the sun, including my feelings and lots of "serious" topics. unless the word "shy" has more definitions than i'm aware of, being so doesn't preclude anyone from being able to discuss important topics with people they are close to, including romantic relationships.
I know someone who thinks asking for advice or needing emotional support--even once--signifies weakness, lack of motivation, and a complete inability to communicate directly. Any attempt to improve oneself, to her, was an attempt to intentionally deceive her. And anyone who disagreed with these bizarre ideas was considered a "manipulator".
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
I MUCH prefer shy men over outgoing ones, but I still like a man to have enough sense of self to know his strengths and weaknesses, and to capitalize on the former. His strength may be in mathematics, or playing chess, or doing crossword puzzles, or styling hair, or interior design - they don't all have to be chest-beating "manly men."
the problem with shy men is they don't talk [they avoid serious discussions). So if there's a problem in the relationship, guess what's not getting discussed?
if shy men are anything like shy women, then this isn't necessarily true: for example, i'm generally pretty shy and not very talkative with people i don't know well, but once i know someone well i can (and usually do) talk about just about everything under the sun, including my feelings and lots of "serious" topics. unless the word "shy" has more definitions than i'm aware of, being so doesn't preclude anyone from being able to discuss important topics with people they are close to, including romantic relationships.
I know someone who thinks asking for advice or needing emotional support--even once--signifies weakness, lack of motivation, and a complete inability to communicate directly. Any attempt to improve oneself, to her, was an attempt to intentionally deceive her. And anyone who disagreed with these bizarre ideas was considered a "manipulator".
i have no idea how your comment relates to what i said. did i miss something? i'm not sure what you're trying to say to me.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,163
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Are we talking level of social outgoing-ness (shy vs. outgoing), or are we talking about insecurity/lack of confidence, or are we talking about helplessness vs. competence, or are we talking nerdy vs. jocky? None of those are at all the same thing.

Maybe what I'm trying to describe is wanting someone to have a well-developed sense of who they are, and maybe that is something that only comes with age and experience. But I do remember that, even in middle school and high school, I was always attracted to the geeky shy guys who were comfortable with themselves and didn't give a rat's ass about what other people thought of them. They were openly geeky, nerdy, or weird (or super-intelligent, which in high school was considered much less desirable than being one of the jocks). Non-mainstream, in other words. And guys who have the confidence to be exactly who they are and not feel the need to conform with whatever the fad du jour might be, are HOT. Even if they're shy on the surface.
This is why I don't get the whole PUA thing - it's encouraging men to all conform with that brash, cocky, jock (or "bad boy") stereotype. And I seriously don't get the women who are attracted to that sort of façade.
Shyness is perceived as weakness, fear and insecurity by the majority of people, Period.
And shyness is certainly NOT "being comfortable with oneself" and certainly not "not giving a rat's ass about what other people think" - Shy people are shy to talk with others because they are always not comfortable and always afraid of people's reactions; it's totally contradictory to what you are saying.
Think of it, if a shy person really doesn't give a rat's ass about anyone then he/she wouldn't get shy to talk with anyone in the first place


I think it's you who are confusing things, you are mainly confusing between "quiet" and "shy" - it's impossible for a very shy person to be socially confident (he might be confident at performing in some skill).
Shyness is often seen as a hindrance on people and their development. The cause of shyness is often disputed but it is found that fear is positively related to shyness,[2] suggesting that fearful children are much more likely to develop being shy as opposed to less fearful children. Shyness can also be seen on a biological level as a result of an excess of cortisol. When cortisol is present in greater quantities it is known to suppress an individual?s immune system, making them more susceptible to illness and disease.[3] The genetics of shyness is a relatively small area of research that has been receiving an even smaller amount of attention, although papers on the biological bases of shyness date back to 1988. Some research has indicated that shyness and aggression are related?through long and short forms of the gene DRD4, though considerably more research on this is needed. Further, it has been suggested that shyness and social phobia (the distinction between the two is becoming ever more blurred) are related to obsessive-compulsive disorder. As with other studies of behavioral genetics, the study of shyness is complicated by the number of genes involved in, and the confusion in defining, the phenotype. Naming the phenotype ? and translation of terms between genetics and psychology ? also causes problems.
Several genetic links to shyness are current areas of research. One is the serotonin transporter promoter region polymorphism (5-HTTLPR), the long form of which has been shown to be modestly correlated with shyness in grade school children.[4] Previous studies had shown a connection between this form of the gene and both obsessive-compulsive disorder and autism.[5] Mouse models have also been used, to derive genes suitable for further study in humans; one such gene, the glutamic acid decarboxylase gene (which encodes an enzyme that functions in GABA synthesis), has so far been shown to have some association with behavioral inhibition.[6]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791465/
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 15 Aug 2014, 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,163
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
And here professionals talk about Shyness as a mild form of Social Phobia:
http://www.webmd.com/anxiety-panic/guid ... y-disorder
Looking into the definition of Social Phobia, it's an irrational fear of being socially embarrassed - that's really contradictory to "not giving a damn what others think".
The symptoms usually do not subside but get worse as the situation progresses. The person with SAD usually realizes that his fears are unfounded but is still unable to control them.
http://socialanxietydisorder.about.com/ ... eening.htm
Cafe, I consider those two different things. To simplify, shy = being uncomfortable talking to new people; introverted = not needing (or wanting) to talk to people.
I like "breaking through" a shy person's reserve. You have to give them space and not seem threatening, but at the same time catch their interest enough for them to forget about their initial discomfort and open up. I don't always know the key to unlocking any one particular shy person, but in my case, it's definitely by catching my intellectual interest.
Boo, if shyness is a pathological condition, then why do men (as you say) prefer shy women? If it reaches the level of social anxiety (or even social panic), then yeah, I can see that it's definitely a problem.