Consequences in "why to ask first"
So, the crusade against the straw man continues. For someone of the OP's intelligence, the article in the OP is a laughably weak illustration of the message being promoted. I mean, it's weak even by straw man standards! Nobody knows the facts of that case and the guy hasn't even been charged, let alone convicted. Of course, if you're just trying to stir the pot yet again - congratulations, it's working. 8 pages and counting.
_________________
CloudFlare eating your posts? Try the Lazarus browser extension. See https://wp-fmx.github.io/WP/
You are talking theoretically. Sure men should be better educated; and of course the responsibility rests with men; they are the one's who do the crime. However, it is you who are naive if you think women should throw caution to the wind and not at least try to minimise the risk of being raped, or avoid situations and behaviour that puts them at high risk. I don't know what your family circumstances are, but if you had a teenage daughter who you'd already said could attend a party where lots of her school friends would be going - including boys. Are you telling me that you would not give her any advice if she wanted to wear the following T-shirt to the party?
Any further advice on her intended plan to walk home alone after the party, late at night through this neighbourhood:
Or would you say nothing, because it is her right to wear what she likes and go where she likes without being raped?
Any parent would (hopefully) advise their daughter against wearing that T-shirt and against walking through that neighbourhood on her own, especially at night and especially wearing that T-shirt! It isn't victim blaming or misogyny; it is giving advice that may help prevent their daughter becoming a victim of rape. It is showing common sense in the face of danger.
So what would you do? The party is tonight. Your daughter is wearing that T-shirt and ready to step out of the door, where a female family friend is ready to drive her to the party (no lift is available to bring her home though). Well? What would you say to her and why?
you think most women, by the age of 12-13, don't already know all the "tips" of how to stay safe? it's not like the girls haven't been warned enough and we just need to keep telling them to be cautious and then rape won't happen, because guess what--girls and women get told to be careful and cautious ALL THE TIME and yet rape still happens. but i guess if we just keep warning them to be cautious, that will somehow make rape not happen anymore because eventually all the women will be locked up in their homes and never go out alone and then the proliferation of rapists will have no one to rape and so will shrivel up and die, and that;s how the whole problem will be solved. maybe while we're at it, we should try convincing the women to complete cover themselves when they do go out (only in groups or escorted by males of course, for their own safety)--that for sure will prevent rape. wait, this sounds oddly familiar, has someone thought of this before? surely if they have, there's no such thing as rape where they've implemented those rules of "caution" for women.
oh yeah that's right--and they have no violence against women, right? yup, the ladies just need to learn to be more cautious, that's all--then we will live in utopic paradise.
I fully agree with your that women hiding away in their homes isn't the solution but seeing as there will apparently always be some men out there who are ready and willing to rape women what do you propose? Personally I don't know any men who have either committed rape or who would be likely to commit rape - but what does anyone know really about another person and what hidden demons they carry, so I'm doubtful that any more "education" would help matters. Men know it is wrong and immoral to rape, murder or commit various other crimes, but they are already educated to know that, but some just don't care they commit these crimes anyway.
What would YOU have said to your daughter in the scenario I gave? I'd really like to know.
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
yes, because it's not at all a valuable lesson for the man in the article or anyone else that if he had simply asked and made sure the woman was cool with whatever it is that he did to her sexually before he did it, he wouldn't be currently having his life ruined in the public eye and we wouldn't be needing to have this discussion about why consent is so important. if he had understood back then that "she didn't say no" isn't good enough, he wouldn't be where he is.
I fully agree with your that women hiding away in their homes isn't the solution but seeing as there will apparently always be some men out there who are ready and willing to rape women what do you propose? Personally I don't know any men who have either committed rape or who would be likely to commit rape - but what does anyone know really about another person and what hidden demons they carry, so I'm doubtful that any more "education" would help matters. Men know it is wrong and immoral to rape, murder or commit various other crimes, but they are already educated to know that, but some just don't care they commit these crimes anyway.
What would YOU have said to your daughter in the scenario I gave? I'd really like to know.
i don't have a daughter (or a son), and very specifically so i don't have to have these kinds of conversations with a child. i wouldn't do anyone the disservice of trying to raise them in this world.
Once again, you guys have made the signal -- and misogynist -- error of putting the responsibility for avoiding rape and assault on women, when that responsibility belongs on men*. But people do not teach men what rape is or how not to do it. They don't make it clear to their sons that if they do such things -- and there's a whole lot of 'em who do -- they will no longer have families or futures. They blame women for going running alone.
When is the last time any of these people talked to a group of men about what rape, assault, and harassment are, how not to do it, and how to support women in going after the men who do it?
People might not come running to your aid when you blow a whistle, but I'm damn sure the odds are better if you use one than if you don't. Doubly so if you have a weapon or some means with which to defend yourself. I'm not blaming the victim--the perpetrator is entirely at fault-- but we shouldn't teach people not to take precautions.
Also, the responsibility is not on men, the responsibility is on rapists. And I don't know any rapists, but the heinous nature of the crime suggests, to me, that they won't be receptive to "yeah, don't do this, it's bad". Therefore, precautions must be taken. If there are serious scientific studies that disprove this, I would like to see them.
We don't try telling murderers and burglars and arsonists to be better people. We teach people what to do when they refuse to. Why does rape get special treatment?
Implying someone here wants all women to wear burqas is the ultimate straw man. You see, most of us usually find a woman?s figure a pleasant sight. And there?s a big difference between this and wanting to assault her, but I don?t seriously expect at this point to be able to prevent tarantella64 and starvingartist from construing this as though I?m defending rape.
If I lived in a society where women wore burqas, I probably wouldn?t yet know what they look like.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,045
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Once again, you guys have made the signal -- and misogynist -- error of putting the responsibility for avoiding rape and assault on women, when that responsibility belongs on men*. But people do not teach men what rape is or how not to do it. They don't make it clear to their sons that if they do such things -- and there's a whole lot of 'em who do -- they will no longer have families or futures. They blame women for going running alone.
When is the last time any of these people talked to a group of men about what rape, assault, and harassment are, how not to do it, and how to support women in going after the men who do it?
I do not and will never take , blame, guilt, for what a another man does. nore would I for what another US citzen does.
as I would not ask you to for women who mistreat men or are materialistic. it is not your responsiblitiy to fix those women as it is not mine to fix those men.
i would not go to a dangerous neighborhood that i know muggings happen then say it was non of my fault. I can't swim so I stay out of the river. if i go in and drown is it the river's fault?
if you know an area has had rapes in the past why wouldn't you avoid that area? how is saying to avoid areas with crime saying its the womans fault to get raped. it isn't her fault just as if i get mugged going into an area with high mugging rates, its not my fault, but I could have avoided it.
as for dress. if you show your boobs ecpect to get glances. If i walked around with my penish showing i would get a whole lot more then glances. if i even just were pants taht showed its form or wore shorts that were so small you could see my balls. I would get a ticket or jail, but women can do these things and its find then if a guy stares or says something he's just sexisit and objectifiing her. we are biologically driven to see each others body as sexual its to get us to reproduce. its not needed now but we can't just rid our selves of it. so I think if its not ok for a man to dress like that then it shouldn't' be for a woman.
doesn't ok rape, but a glance isn't bad or rape. openly staring is. but you can't rid humans of the human instincts.
I carry protection, i lock my doors, I watch around me. I stay out of bad areas. if the cops say theres a lot of drug dealers on such streat stay away I stay away.
I can't se how that is saying its the victim's fault. we as people will always examin stuff and say if they hadn't done that then they would have avoided it.
this guy got stabbed in his car, he had left his door unlocked so while fighting with one another came up behind him. as he looked back he thought if Id locked my car doors when I drove off from my house then that guy wouldn't been able to do that. is he blaming himself. is he taking the blame off the two guys who tried to kill him. no.
http://forums.plentyoffish.com/datingPosts3087240.aespx
http://forums.plentyoffish.com/datingPosts14607032.aspx
Where the responses of most of the female users are "be spontaneous" - and they make it clear that asking is a turn off! I made once a simple count and like 90% of the female users there want the kiss spontaneous.
It was the case in most of online discussion regarding this subject on every dating site's forum.
So seriously, if this "rule" is bad and has bad consequences, then men aren't the only guilty ones for promoting a such "rule", as you can see a lot of women demand it.
Here an interesting article:
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27831626
Even among the comments, women and men are objecting against the verbal asking - personally I think shifting to a verbal consent is way better; damn to the signals and games, damn to Soap's "romance" - let's make all things clear, I think people are too brainwashed by romance movies beyond common sense, people should go back to common sense.
StarvingArtist and tarantella, do you know what I advise you to do to take a part in this social change? and to be more effective at it?
I think it would be useful if you both go to forums.plentyoffish.com, and to address the women users there and explaining to them how promoting spontaneity in dating is dangerous and bad for them and how it make millions of other women fall victims of harassment. This would be way more effective than fighting the same guys here on wrongplanet.
This "spontaneity kiss rule" will only die if the majority of women expect and demand an "ask first for kiss" rule - as long there are a lot and lot of women like we are seeing in pof, then it won't die.
It would be nice to see how the discussions with them would be. :p GO get em!!
You have to admit the ?spontaneous-kiss rule? is a great way of practicing sexual selection: ?Kiss me without knowing if I?ll welcome it, because otherwise I?ll be disgusted at your wimpiness and not give you the time of the day. If I turn out to like you?which I probably knew already, but, of course, I didn?t tell you so you had to take the risk?everything is okay unless we break up; then I might choose to deny my previous consent and get some satisfaction screwing your life. If I don?t like you in the first place, you?ll pay dearly for thinking an exquisite female like me might be interested in such a worthless male as the one you are. I?m deeply insulted by your arrogance and till the end of your sorry life you?ll rue the day you took that initiative I of course steered clear of warning you against. F*ck you!?
Yes....yes, you're right! I would choose to not reproduce with a such woman.
Let's not forget the other sources that promote that sort of mentality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7xf-oj4X8A
Seems timely:
http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/26/nail- ... rape-drugs
A team of undergraduate students at North Carolina State University has developed a novel solution to helping women avoid "date rape" drugs like Rohypnol (aka "roofies") and Gamma-Hydroxybutric acid (GHB): nail polish that changes colors when it comes into contact with these substances. "Our goal is to invent technologies that empower women to protect themselves from this heinous and quietly pervasive crime," the creators of "Undercover Colors" polish wrote in their winning submission to the school's Entrepreneurship Initiative competition?hardly the words of people promoting sexual assault, would you say?
Yet bunches of high-profile, liberal feminists* saw things otherwise. Maya Dusenbury at the blog Feministing starts with a good point?that drugs like Rohypnol, Xanax, and GHB are not used to facilitate rape as commonly as we might imagine, and it's important not to give people false impressions of when and how assaults take place. But to Dusenbury, that makes preventative efforts aimed at less-common circumstances somehow suspect:
Are you at all worried that by overstating the prevalence of date rape drugs, your product might give its users, who are no less likely to become victims of other kinds of sexual assault, a false sense of security? And given that your product only addresses a relatively tiny subsection of the sexual violence in this country, do you have any plans to donate your profits to help protect the remainder of the 18 percent?
Yes, her complaint actually seems to be that the nail polish creators are only helping prevent some rapes and not all rapes. Meanwhile, Salon assistant editor Jenny Kutner is skeptical of the polish and yet still distraught that it will be sold and not magically subsidized and distributed freely:
... there?s room for skepticism about a rape prevention method that aims to deter assaults through more fear and stigma ? albeit stigma attached to committing sexual assault, not to surviving it ? instead of through education. And, beyond that, tools like Undercover Colors raise questions about the cost of profiting from rape prevention: Is this really a market we should continue to applaud entrepreneurs? (notably male ones) tapping into? Or might these resources be better allocated trying to teach people not to rape?
There's quite a bit more in that vein in the original article, including links to examples.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
Actually, his real mistake was not appreciating the due process shredding, shoot first ask questions later digital lynchmob that is online feminism and attempting to explain his side of things rather than just grabbing a lawyer and presenting his accuser with a legally binding 'evidence, please?'. He is where he is because his story is useful for some people to push an agenda, and those people don't particularly care about the harm done by treating someone as if they're guilty until proven innocent. Talk about victim blaming...
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
I think you've missed the point. The guy has indeed been charged and convicted in one of the few courts that matter.
Actually, his real mistake was not appreciating the due process shredding, shoot first ask questions later digital lynchmob that is online feminism and attempting to explain his side of things rather than just grabbing a lawyer and presenting his accuser with a legally binding 'evidence, please?'. He is where he is because his story is useful for some people to push an agenda, and those people don't particularly care about the harm done by treating someone as if they're guilty until proven innocent. Talk about victim blaming...
Go on ahead and cling to the idea, Dox, but the fact is he's not welcome at an industry conference, not a speculum party. Whole bunch of people, men and women, many of whom understand why (a) doing what he did and (b) attempting to brush it off as lady-vaporing are bad ideas in a business community. Frankly, even if he'd been the tool he was back then, but been willing and able to recognize it today and say so, he'd be okay now, instead of calling himself unemployable.
If you're carrying around the idea that the only sexual harassment that counts is documented with a rape kit, and you're pushing that to the limit, you ought to take note.
eta: I'm watching what's going on with registration at this formerly incredibly popular, gotta-be-there sciwriting conference...it's crickets and tumbleweeds. There's no buzz, registration's a quarter of what it used to be. All because of one guy who just had to go macking on the ladies in the business, when all they were after was a job.
Last edited by tarantella64 on 28 Aug 2014, 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
if one has no problem with going to jail/joining a sex-offender registry.
other people's bodies are not your property, pal. it's not about wanting approval, it's about being a decent human being: you should try it sometime.
I'm fortunate to have met forward women that displayed their attraction to me very outwardly, I don't think I could impose on someone if it wasn't in a romantic setting because it would feel awkward and forced, it certainly isn't appropriate outside of context but at the same time you have to take the initiative through signals, not permission.
Men need to think of it as getting confirmation that she is willing, not as "asking for permission".
You may be able to read body language perfectly all the time but most people here are aspies who are not very good at reading signals, so it is probably better to make sure that they're interpreting girls' signals right.
They can just say "wanna kiss?" And if she is really into you she won't be so easily turned off by you saying that. And also you can avoid being accused of sexual assault.
if one has no problem with going to jail/joining a sex-offender registry.
other people's bodies are not your property, pal. it's not about wanting approval, it's about being a decent human being: you should try it sometime.
I'm fortunate to have met forward women that displayed their attraction to me very outwardly, I don't think I could impose on someone if it wasn't in a romantic setting because it would feel awkward and forced, it certainly isn't appropriate outside of context but at the same time you have to take the initiative through signals, not permission.
Men need to think of it as getting confirmation that she is willing, not as "asking for permission".
You may be able to read body language perfectly all the time but most people here are aspies who are not very good at reading signals, so it is probably better to make sure that they're interpreting girls' signals right.
They can just say "wanna kiss?" And if she is really into you she won't be so easily turned off by you saying that. And also you can avoid being accused of sexual assault.
Totally true. Also, if you're that scared of losing dominance and are that easily humiliated in love, I kinda question whether you ought to be dating at all.
Very much so. Bodies belong to the people living in them. If it's not yours, ask before touching, at least until there's an understanding worked out between the two of you.
I've asked to kiss girls on dates and they've told me later that ruined the date for them. An ex of mine even told me to not ask.
your ex girlfriend doesn't speak for me or for any other woman but herself.
Yet you somehow speak for all women when you say you need to ask permission, funny how that works.
No, really, I need this explained, not just a *facepalm*. Perhaps by tarantella64 rather than startvingartist as starvingartist never actually said that one needs to ask permission, but tarantella64 certainly does seem to be speaking for me (or at least, trying to coach people on how to treat me).