04 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
juliekitty wrote:
There's no place for logic in this argument.
That's why there's room for you, kitty cat!
juliekitty wrote:
It all boils down to whether you think the Bible is truth or not.
Rags thinks women should submit to their husbands for the same reason he won't eat shellfish or wear wool/linen blends: Because the Bible says so.
Demonstrating your vice-like grip on facts, you're incorrect about those last two things being my beliefs, so I guess that's why you believe in purple dinosaurs and global warming. (Did I get at least one of those right?)
04 Oct 2007, 11:08 am
04 Oct 2007, 11:26 am
...who forgot to shut the gate when they left the PP&R area....
04 Oct 2007, 11:30 am
shadexiii wrote:
...who forgot to shut the gate when they left the PP&R area....
Sorry... I guess God is omnipresent!
04 Oct 2007, 11:31 am
Ragtime wrote:
Sorry... I guess God is omnipresent!
Talk of "God" seems to be... Until you've got a nice photo of "him," with someone else with a photo taken at the same time, in a different location, I have no reason to believe you to be correct.
Sedaka
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
04 Oct 2007, 1:59 pm
04 Oct 2007, 2:41 pm
Sedaka wrote:
w/e lol
I agree.
Sedaka wrote:
im just glad i never ran into you on the street and somehow started dating you.
Once again, I agree.
Sedaka wrote:
lol im so glad to know your delusions in their purest context
Yeah, right... "Sedaka the intuitive." You've correctly interpretted so little about me, yet you think you know me.
Sedaka wrote:
for the most part... your analagies and logic are somewhat lacking anyway, so my intelligence isnt really offended when chicken little says i mis his point
A self-contradictory sentence? ^_^ According to that, you may be missing my points, yet you know they don't make sense?
How does that work, exactly, where you're able to make conclusions on data you haven't collected?Is that some evolutionists' trick or something?
In the terms of your favorite pseudo-science, "Further research is needed."Sedaka wrote:
the point i was referring to was that you were unclear on your definition of equal in relationships. which you've sucessfully dodged SURPIRSE to where it now has no meaning in conversation... so technically i am babbling (harping) on it at this point, but it's because you can't keep up
Well, it was calandale who was using the word "equal" to describe how husbands and wives should live.
But, if I were to use the term, my definition of it ISN'T "everything is exactly the same".
Thank goodness penises and vaginas aren't the same! That wouldn't work too well...
My definition of "equal" in marriage (though, again, I haven't used that term) WOULD include roles for both husband and wife, and the husband is in charge. That's why I wouldn't use the word equal. It's like saying the president of the U.S. is equal to the average U.S. citizen -- a U.S. president is equal to us in basic ways, but of course he's unequal in the rightful amount of power that his duties give him.
Husband leadership and wifely submission in the home is the principle upon which free and functioning societies are based, built, and in which they consist.
And you never answered two of my important points:
1. Why can Ann Coulter see the importance and high functionality of male leadership in the home, but you can't?
2. Is she smarter than you?
Both of these questions you completely ignored, whilst accusing me of skipping over some phantom point you made somewhere at some time.
Last edited by Ragtime on 04 Oct 2007, 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
04 Oct 2007, 3:28 pm
04 Oct 2007, 3:52 pm
Ragtime wrote:
But, if I were to use the term, my definition of it ISN'T "everything is exactly the same".
Thank goodness penises and vaginas aren't the same! That wouldn't work too well...
Thank goodness penises and vaginas aren't the same! That wouldn't work too well...
What penises and vaginas have to do with it? are you using that as an example of why women should be submissive and their husband being a leader, because he is the one who does the penetration? It's very funny if you actually believe that.
Ragtime wrote:
My definition of "equal" in marriage (though, again, I haven't used that term) WOULD include roles for both husband and wife, and the husband is in charge. That's why I wouldn't use the word equal. It's like saying the president of the U.S. is equal to the average U.S. citizen -- a U.S. president is equal to us in basic ways, but of course he's unequal in his rightful amount of power that his duties give him.
How the husband being in charge is equal in your definition? That logic is really amazing.
You know, with that statement above, you are practically saying that men have more mental capabilities and aptitudes than women. In other words, women are inferior and men have more benefit just because they were born male, and that is God's plan?
Ragtime wrote:
Hasband leadership and wifely submission in the home is the principle upon which free and functioning societies are based, built, and in which they consist.
Wife submission and free society in the same sentence?
Last edited by greenblue on 04 Oct 2007, 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
04 Oct 2007, 3:59 pm
04 Oct 2007, 4:02 pm
Ragtime wrote:
calandale wrote:
Ah, I see another bird has appeared,
but spouting meaningless noises, with
no arguments.
Parakeet, if you can't manage any sense,
don't expect an answer. I don't respond to
mere trolling.
but spouting meaningless noises, with
no arguments.
Parakeet, if you can't manage any sense,
don't expect an answer. I don't respond to
mere trolling.
Then what r u doing on Wrongplanet?
He's not trolling, and I find his arguments to be a whole lot more intelligent than yours.
And you seem to be insulting a few people here, I wonder if that is how a good Christian should behave.
04 Oct 2007, 4:07 pm
04 Oct 2007, 4:08 pm
04 Oct 2007, 4:40 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Hasband leadership and wifely submission in the home is the principle upon which free and functioning societies are based, built, and in which they consist.
Thank God for THIS emoticon:
Ragtime wrote:
Both of these questions you completely ignored
Well, I haven't yet heard YOU explain how it is that we're supposed to obey the Biblical command to obey our husbands, yet it's okay for you to disobey the Biblical commands not to eat shellfish or wear wool/linen blends.
Ragtime wrote:
Why can Ann Coulter see the importance and high functionality of male leadership in the home
Because Ann Coulter is a cretin.
You're welcome.
04 Oct 2007, 5:17 pm
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
04 Oct 2007, 5:24 pm
