Qualities you DON'T want in a guy/girl?

Page 9 of 17 [ 267 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 17  Next

League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

01 Aug 2010, 11:36 pm

AnonymousAnonymous wrote:
Has a car


What's wrong with having a car?



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,114
Location: Houston, Texas

02 Aug 2010, 12:31 am

Maybe it has to do with being an advocate of public transportation so people will become less dependent on gas/oil and help the environment.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


JonSM99
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
Location: Seattle, WA

02 Aug 2010, 2:47 am

I don't want to turn this thread into a debate about cars. I prefer a woman who also refuses to own one. AAA says the average annual cost of owning one is $9200 (US). That's money down the drain you never get back. Getting around by foot, bike, and public transit means I save easily $8000 a year of that which I can spend on other things, like the right girl if I ever meet her. I owned my homes 2001-07, and owning a home blasts owning a car to smithereens.



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,148

02 Aug 2010, 4:42 am

JonSM99 wrote:
I don't want to turn this thread into a debate about cars. I prefer a woman who also refuses to own one. AAA says the average annual cost of owning one is $9200 (US). That's money down the drain you never get back. Getting around by foot, bike, and public transit means I save easily $8000 a year of that which I can spend on other things, like the right girl if I ever meet her. I owned my homes 2001-07, and owning a home blasts owning a car to smithereens.

I'd have no objections to a partner of mine having an expensive hobby like that.....as long as it's understood that she funds it herself. You guys surely don't subscribe to the old notion that the man gives the woman money just because of his gender, do you? If a partner of mine were unwaged, I'd subsidise her with enough cash for the basics, in the same way as I'd want her to subsidise me if I were unwaged.



hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

02 Aug 2010, 5:08 am

Quote:
Women only consider that a turn off because it means the guy hasn't got much money which then in turn means he can't spoil the girl rotten and then she can't dream about the idea of him giving her an easy life and handing everything to her on a plate etc.


No, it means the guy has no independence, can't look after himself, never grew up past 16, is immature and doesn't make an effort to get anywhere in life.

Thats not attractive.

Men in the age range i'm attracted to (30s) who live with their parents (and not just for a short term till you get off your feet or you're waiting for a place) who live with their parents are an automatic no.

I'd rather date a poor guy with something to him than someone with more money who lives with his parents.



Daemonic-Jackal
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 581
Location: Salford, United Kingdom

02 Aug 2010, 5:14 am

hyperlexian wrote:
Daemonic-Jackal wrote:
Jono wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
Selfish

lives with parents

Why is living with parents always a deal breaker for some people? What happens if there is a valid reason for doing so?


Women only consider that a turn off because it means the guy hasn't got much money which then in turn means he can't spoil the girl rotten and then she can't dream about the idea of him giving her an easy life and handing everything to her on a plate etc.

You get the idea.


ummmm no. do you find it necessary to make these kind of assumptions about women because then you can categorize something you don't understand? some women like for men to be living independently so that.... they can prove they are *able* to live independently. for some women (AND MEN) this is very important.

i keep reading over and over on the boards how women only care about men's money, like you have essentially said once again in this thread. that is patently untrue, and unfair to the masses and masses of women who did not fit into that category at all.

[edited for spelling. sheesh]


Your argument is flawed because you are basically saying some people will assume anyone who doesn't live on their own 'cant' live independently (which is prejudice in itself) Also what's the most vital ingredient for someone who wishes to have their own flat/house? It's MONEY! In a lot of places around the world it's bloody expensive to live on your own, where you have to be working full-time and have a pretty decent salary to manage it and still live a decent life at the same time.

I know most women are not money grabbers (I should have phrased my original statement much better) in the sense of the word that society uses it and obviously your circumstances were a role reversal in the traditional sense of how a household works. But don't try fob me off by claiming most women saying income/career/status isn't a factor when judging a man when it is.


_________________
"Every cripple has his own way of walking. " ? Brendan Behan

http://www.facebook.com/YentonianCarlos


JonSM99
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
Location: Seattle, WA

02 Aug 2010, 11:27 am

It reminds me of the totally clear preference among women for taller men. I don't think there's any rational explanation for it at all; it must be evolutionary. It's amazing how powerful this one variable is. I took a sample of 50 women on dating sites near me, and fully half pre-rejected me based on height alone--even though some were shorter than I am. I can find an article where women basically said that even a much smarter, more accomplished, more successful, wealthier man is less desirable if he's short. When asked what might make them more interested in a shorter man, they said if the taller one were a murderer or child molester.



JonSM99
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
Location: Seattle, WA

Ferdinand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,332
Location: America

02 Aug 2010, 11:48 am

I don't think I'd date a black girl. Ever.


_________________
It don't take no Sherlock Holmes to see it's a little different around here.


TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

02 Aug 2010, 11:49 am

I do not want a racist.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Ferdinand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,332
Location: America

02 Aug 2010, 11:50 am

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
I do not want a racist.


Oh, screw you. :P


_________________
It don't take no Sherlock Holmes to see it's a little different around here.


TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

02 Aug 2010, 11:51 am

Please don't. That would be kind of illegal.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Ferdinand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,332
Location: America

02 Aug 2010, 11:57 am

I guess if she is a liberal, then it ain't gonna' happen.


_________________
It don't take no Sherlock Holmes to see it's a little different around here.


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

02 Aug 2010, 1:36 pm

Daemonic-Jackal wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Daemonic-Jackal wrote:
Jono wrote:
hale_bopp wrote:
Selfish

lives with parents

Why is living with parents always a deal breaker for some people? What happens if there is a valid reason for doing so?


Women only consider that a turn off because it means the guy hasn't got much money which then in turn means he can't spoil the girl rotten and then she can't dream about the idea of him giving her an easy life and handing everything to her on a plate etc.

You get the idea.


ummmm no. do you find it necessary to make these kind of assumptions about women because then you can categorize something you don't understand? some women like for men to be living independently so that.... they can prove they are *able* to live independently. for some women (AND MEN) this is very important.

i keep reading over and over on the boards how women only care about men's money, like you have essentially said once again in this thread. that is patently untrue, and unfair to the masses and masses of women who did not fit into that category at all.

[edited for spelling. sheesh]


Your argument is flawed because you are basically saying some people will assume anyone who doesn't live on their own 'cant' live independently (which is prejudice in itself) Also what's the most vital ingredient for someone who wishes to have their own flat/house? It's MONEY! In a lot of places around the world it's bloody expensive to live on your own, where you have to be working full-time and have a pretty decent salary to manage it and still live a decent life at the same time.

I know most women are not money grabbers (I should have phrased my original statement much better) in the sense of the word that society uses it and obviously your circumstances were a role reversal in the traditional sense of how a household works. But don't try fob me off by claiming most women saying income/career/status isn't a factor when judging a man when it is.


no, you are misunderstanding. i was talking about independence in terms of caring for oneself - cooking, cleaning, paying bills, coming and going as you please, having friends over without asking permission, etc. even if a person is on assistance payments they can still live independently. what i am referring to is not about money - it's about caring for oneself if they physically are able to. this is important to many men and women in a mate.

you are assuming that all women judge men for their money, and they don't. just like all men don't judge women for their looks. in both cases, about 9/10 of the human race would never ever marry if it were absolutely, or even generally, true... because most of us are not rich or hot.

i honestly think that these kinds of assumptions arise from when people are rejected by the opposite sex - women will complain that men only want beautiful skinny girls, and men complain that women only want rich alpha males. perhaps it is helpful for people to externalize the blame to the opposite sex instead of looking internally at what is pushing potential partners away.



AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 72,576
Location: Portland, Oregon

02 Aug 2010, 2:45 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
Maybe it has to do with being an advocate of public transportation so people will become less dependent on gas/oil and help the environment.


Yes, exactly.


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 72,576
Location: Portland, Oregon

02 Aug 2010, 2:45 pm

Taller or shorter than me...


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!