What females really want
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
I see no rational reason to hold back if someone's being sexist or misogynist. Instead of arguing against it, it might help to understand why it was stated. You might learn something you didn't know before. You just have to be willing to accept that there are perspectives that differ from your own.
Pointing out that someone said or did something sexist or misogynist is not failing to be open-minded, and if someone has been sexist or misogynist, that's already not constructive. It's not worth it to interact with someone who refuses to accept their own culpability, or who pretends that the moment when things go wrong is when their poor behavior is pointed out, instead of the moment when they said or did something sexist or misogynist.
I would ask people to be open-minded and try not to say or do sexist or misogynist things, instead of trying to blame the targets of such actions for responding negatively toward it. No one is owed unanimous positivity and sometimes you're going to piss someone off. You need to be able to deal with that instead of pretending like they're the problem.
Also:
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/comp ... ml#hostile
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/complete.html#angry
Last edited by Verdandi on 11 Jul 2012, 3:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
compliments affection teddybears cuddling and chocolate!!
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
I see no rational reason to hold back if someone's being sexist or misogynist. Instead of arguing against it, it might help to understand why it was stated. You might learn something you didn't know before. You just have to be willing to accept that there are perspectives that differ from your own.
Pointing out that someone said or did something sexist or misogynist is not failing to be open-minded, and if someone has been sexist or misogynist, that's already not constructive, and it's not worth it to interact with someone who refuses to accept their own culpability, or who pretends that the moment when things go wrong is when their poor behavior is pointed out, instead of the moment when they said or did something sexist or misogynist.
Also:
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/comp ... ml#hostile
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/complete.html#angry
WHERE DID I PUT MY SHACKLES??? YOU MUST NEVER LEAVE L&D AGAIN!! !! ! NEVARRRRRRRRRR
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
I see no rational reason to hold back if someone's being sexist or misogynist. Instead of arguing against it, it might help to understand why it was stated. You might learn something you didn't know before. You just have to be willing to accept that there are perspectives that differ from your own.
Pointing out that someone said or did something sexist or misogynist is not failing to be open-minded, and if someone has been sexist or misogynist, that's already not constructive. It's not worth it to interact with someone who refuses to accept their own culpability, or who pretends that the moment when things go wrong is when their poor behavior is pointed out, instead of the moment when they said or did something sexist or misogynist.
I would ask people to be open-minded and try not to say or do sexist or misogynist things, instead of trying to blame the targets of such actions for responding negatively toward it. No one is owed unanimous positivity and sometimes you're going to piss someone off. You need to be able to deal with that instead of pretending like they're the problem.
Also:
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/comp ... ml#hostile
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/complete.html#angry
If you want to spend your life on the internet having a circular argument and using sweeping generalizations to put people in boxes, that's up to you. I personally wouldn't do that and if I was going to reprimand someone, it would be in a private discussion.
Verdandi
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

Sweeping generalizations to put people in boxes happens to be something that sexism and misogyny are all about. Why do you keep trying to shift the responsibility from actually doing these things to blaming the people who point it out for causing the problem? Too many people would much prefer to sweep things out of sight than deal with them honestly.
I'd prefer that people weren't sexist or misogynist at all, but somehow they keep doing it. If they're going to do it in public I see no reason to make it a private issue.
I don't get it. It doesn't bother me when someone points out I made a social mistake. Why so much invested in not ever talking about this particular thing - or only talking about it in private where no one else can see? What is so horrible about pointing out "You said something sexist" that it should never happen? It's not making a sweeping generalization, nor is it pushing people into boxes. It's typically an honest observation of common human behavior.
In any event, I don't have circular arguments on the internet. I usually stop talking to people who keep pushing that it's worse to be called out for sexism than it is to be sexist.

Sweeping generalizations to put people in boxes happens to be something that sexism and misogyny are all about. Why do you keep trying to shift the responsibility from actually doing these things to blaming the people who point it out for causing the problem? Too many people would much prefer to sweep things out of sight than deal with them honestly.
I'd prefer that people weren't sexist or misogynist at all, but somehow they keep doing it. If they're going to do it in public I see no reason to make it a private issue.
I don't get it. It doesn't bother me when someone points out I made a social mistake. Why so much invested in not ever talking about this particular thing - or only talking about it in private where no one else can see? What is so horrible about pointing out "You said something sexist" that it should never happen? It's not making a sweeping generalization, nor is it pushing people into boxes. It's typically an honest observation of common human behavior.
In any event, I don't have circular arguments on the internet. I usually stop talking to people who keep pushing that it's worse to be called out for sexism than it is to be sexist.
I would rather have the ability to give someone the option to save face and to see their error rather than simply using a negative term without getting to the bottom of understanding why they took that course of action, it's never good to reprimand someone in a public place because if it is meant for them personally, it should be constructive and solely meant for them. If it's something that others can learn from or it is meant for a group, I would reprimand the entire group or take each person aside to deal with it in on an individual basis which might be best.
What you see as an honest observation is actually socially inappropriate in most situations and I'm surprised that you do not realize that it is a social mistake in itself to point something out in an attempt to discredit the person, it is only acceptable if understanding can come from it and it isn't necessary to do so in public anyway. If they do it in public and initiate it, by all means, it can be appropriate to make a direct response in public if that's what they are indicating at or asking for.
If I had a problem with you, I would take you to one side and ask you straight if you had a problem and a possible solution to that problem instead of trying to rally people for my opinion to discredit you.
Because countering one sweeping generalization (eg: "all women want is money") with another sweeping generalization (eg: "no women anywhere do that - there's no such thing") and then blaming the first person for being evil is just plain wrong. Not only are both people making completely false generalizations, the other is also bullying the first by discrediting and ridiculing.
Interesting to note that discrediting and ridiculing your opponent at every opportunity is a popular tactic of many militant groups, as well as a trait of many sociopaths.
It's wrong because it's cruel. If my point can't stand on its own, kicking someone else down won't make it any stronger - yet it happens all the time in our world. [sigh]
Verdandi is making so many excellent points
people online freak out so much over being told something they said/did was "ist"
big angry blow ups (and in some cases days long temper-tantrums) instead of just asking why what they said was hurtful or clarifying their point
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
Generalizations are bad. But pointing out a specific individual's behaviour or problems with their opinions/ideas/principles, isn't "cruel". I don't believe we have any duty to shelter others from honest observation, at least, not when they put their opinions out in the free marketplace of ideas. There's a tacit waiver of freedom from criticism when one does this. If I have an opinion I don't want any comment on, I keep it to myself.
MXH
Veteran

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain
I didn't say women are more negatively affected by hate. I said women are more negatively affected by sexism. By changing that to "hate" you're shifting the goalposts. Most men I know - many of whom I actually like as people - have been sexist at some point. They don't "hate women" but their perspective on who and what women are and should be is skewed because society is skewed. Women earn less than men in the same occupations (with a very few exceptions), and have had to fight hard to get into mathematic, scientific, or technological careers due to prejudice against women in those fields. This is all factual and easily verified.
Also, I meant the hate crime legislation was PPR. I was about to go into a long digression on hate crimes, criticism of hate crimes, demographics of those most affected by hate crime legislation, but that was veering way off topic. The rest of it seemed relevant here.
Maybe in 1950. But in this day and age that argument is impossible to sustain. You know, between propaganda and laws.
MXH
Veteran

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain
I see no rational reason to hold back if someone's being sexist or misogynist. Instead of arguing against it, it might help to understand why it was stated. You might learn something you didn't know before. You just have to be willing to accept that there are perspectives that differ from your own.
Pointing out that someone said or did something sexist or misogynist is not failing to be open-minded, and if someone has been sexist or misogynist, that's already not constructive. It's not worth it to interact with someone who refuses to accept their own culpability, or who pretends that the moment when things go wrong is when their poor behavior is pointed out, instead of the moment when they said or did something sexist or misogynist.
I would ask people to be open-minded and try not to say or do sexist or misogynist things, instead of trying to blame the targets of such actions for responding negatively toward it. No one is owed unanimous positivity and sometimes you're going to piss someone off. You need to be able to deal with that instead of pretending like they're the problem.
Also:
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/comp ... ml#hostile
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/complete.html#angry
As wolf said, the problem is not people being labeled those terms, because there are some that even i label as such. The problem is when such labels are used simply to belittle someone. Which is done very often in this forum in the hopes theyll stop arguing.
Also, notice how my language has been gender neutral this whole time. You guys (not as in people with penises, but as people overall) are filling what i say with what you want to hear/argue. Its something i often do to check if the person arguing me does so for a valid point or for the sake of argument.