Bigotry against involuntarily celibate men

Page 9 of 100 [ 1585 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 100  Next

goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

05 Nov 2018, 12:49 pm

magnetowasright wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
Didn't we already discuss this for like 20 pages and come to the consensus that people are indifferent towards sexless men but dislike the violent/threatening types who identify with the label "incel," and either are violent/rapists or threaten to be?

There's a huge difference between some regular guy who doesn't have sex and some crazy as*hole who wants to rape and murder because he doesn't have sex.

I think the OP is confusing the general sentiment of the public towards the crazy threatening ones with what people think of All sexless men.


If by "incels" you are referring to a specific narrow group of self-identified individuals who congregate online and spew hatred and misogyny, then I have never traveled in those circles and was not even aware of their existence until now.

However, I am not in the slightest convinced that what most posters mean, as you claim. As evidence, I direct you to Aspie19828's post:

Aspie19828 wrote:
Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma bomber was an incel, Columbine shooters were incels, Elliot Rodger was an incel, numerous mass shooters and serial killers have all been incels. Facts and evidence reveal true incels are evil people that carry out real crimes.


Note that the poster refers to the perpetrators of the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Columbine shooting as incels, despite the fact that both of these events took place many years before the term incel was coined or online incel forums existed. This proves that Aspie19828 did not mean exclusively self-identifying incels when they proclaimed "facts and evidence reveal true incels are evil people that carry out real crimes", but lonely men in general.

People claiming that by "incels" they do not mean all lonely men are talking out of both sides of their mouths. First, they proclaim "all incels", but when backed into a corner regarding their bigotry they attempt to backpedal by claiming they only meant self-identifying incels. But Aspie19828 has unwittingly exposed that particular lie.

Regardless of whatever semantics are in play, it is a reality of my life that I have rarely been able to attract a girlfriend due to my Autism. The only exception was when I spent two years in a toxic and emotionally abusive relationship with a woman who exploited my loneliness and insecurities to manipulate and use me. That relationship ended over 10 years ago and I have not experienced any romantic success since then.

I accept that no woman is obligated to settle for a loser like myself when there are always much better options available. I do not begrudge them that. I am aware it is neither the fault of women nor genetically superior men that I am a loser. I accept that this is my own failing, not a conspiracy to keep me miserable.

Yet when I attempted to express my feelings of depression and despair to others, hoping to find support; instead I was often mocked as a loser, labeled a misogynist, told I think I'm entitled to sex, and compared to Elliot Rodgers.

There are thousands of people like me, possibly even millions, who never have and never would hurt or condone hurting anyone. We are driven to depression by our loneliness, often ending in suicide. But nobody ever notices. It is only the Rodgers and Minassians the world ever sees. And I'm tired of it.


And these types of men have likely existed for as long as man has. There are only more of them now because we have the highest population of humans ever. Also, we hear about them more because of the internet and news media etc.

Anyways, being tired of it changes nothing. What solution do you propose?


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


karathraceandherspecialdestiny
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Jan 2017
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,857

05 Nov 2018, 1:47 pm

magnetowasright wrote:
karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
magnetowasright wrote:
karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
How many incels need to go on killing sprees before we stop talking about how unfair it is to judge people negatively for calling themselves incels?

This is in such poor taste, after Friday's shooting. This thread should be locked out of respect for the women who were murdered by a self-described incel.


Of course, the shooting is (like all shootings) tragic and inexcusable.

But posts like this are exactly why this thread is relevant. You point to some instances in which individuals who identify as incels carry out horrible acts of violence, and use them as justification to condemn all lonely men. We all readily acknowledge that as bigoted when it is done in regards to any other group.

And Incel is not something I call myself; it's a reality of my existence. I'm getting pretty fed up with having to repeat this.

How many Muslims need to go on killing sprees before we stop talking about how unfair it is to judge people negatively for calling themselves Muslims?

F***ing SJWs and your bullsh!t double standards!

And by the way, this thread was started on October 27. In case you're bad at math, that was a whole week before Friday. Just an FYI.


I very clearly stated (twice) in my brief comment that I was talking about people who identify as incels, not lonely people (because not all lonely people call themselves incels.)

I realize the thread was started before the shooting, but now that the shooting has happened I think it's disrespectful of the victims to let it continue. I would say the same about a thread defending anti-Semitic rhetoric that was started before the Tree of Life shooting, that after the shooting it should be locked out of respect for the victims of that anti-Semitic murderous attack.

I'm not even going to address the ridiculous "SJW" hyperbole directly because it's not worth my time or energy.


The topic of this thread is not analogous to an anti-Semitic thread because it is not anti-women or any other group. It exists to defend the thousands of non-violent lonely men lime myself who are constantly compared unfairly to the likes of Elliot Rodger.

Every time a shooting like this does occur, thousands of men whose only crime is being socially awkward and lonely (often due to falling on the Autism Spectrum) are treated by everyone around like they're monsters. Which is why this topic is particularly relevant in the wake of Friday's shooting and is in no way disrespectful to the victims.

Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a number of politicians and celebrities around the US and world came out to remind everyone that the terrorists do not represent all Muslims and that the majority of Muslims are kind and peaceful people. From your point of view, that was disrespectful to the victims as well. Right?

In fact, the only way anyone can consider it disrespectful is if you think all lonely men are responsible for or endorse such crimes.

Here are your own words: "How many incels need to go on killing sprees before we stop talking about how unfair it is to judge people negatively for calling themselves incels?"

Your own comment reveals that you simply want to use these tragedies as an excuse to rationalize your bigotry. You speak out both sides of your mouth, first proclaiming "all incels", but then trying to backpedal when called out on your bigotry to claim you only meant a specific narrow group of incels. Nice try, but your words are right here for all to see.


This is a false analogy. What would be a better analogy would be to compare lonely men to muslims and men who identify as incel and belong to incel forums as an extremist group like ISIS. When there are terrorist attacks people look at extremist groups like ISIS because the terrorist will claim to be from a group like that or Al Queda or whatever, not just a muslim. As the shooter on Friday identified as an woman-hating extremist incel and not just a lonely man.

I have no bigotry against lonely men, I only have disdain for men who identify with terrorist incels like Friday's shooter. Please stop putting words in my mouth that I didn't say, it only makes you look like the one with an agenda here and it makes it hard to take your arguments seriously.



MushroomPrincess
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 335
Location: Turtle Island

05 Nov 2018, 3:38 pm

It's hard to have sympathy for "involuntarily celibate men", considering that voluntarily celibate men (read: clergy) are among the most privileged class on the planet.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

05 Nov 2018, 3:43 pm

MushroomPrincess wrote:
It's hard to have sympathy for "involuntarily celibate men", considering that voluntarily celibate men (read: clergy) are among the most privileged class on the planet.


:roll:

This might be the single dumbest thing I’ve ever read on wrong planet.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


Sabreclaw
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,971

05 Nov 2018, 5:55 pm

MushroomPrincess wrote:
It's hard to have sympathy for "involuntarily celibate men", considering that voluntarily celibate men (read: clergy) are among the most privileged class on the planet.


God has forsaken us.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,103
Location: Adelaide, Australia

05 Nov 2018, 6:28 pm

MushroomPrincess wrote:
It's hard to have sympathy for "involuntarily celibate men", considering that voluntarily celibate men (read: clergy) are among the most privileged class on the planet.

What do those two groups have to do with each other?


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


magnetowasright
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 195
Location: USA

05 Nov 2018, 11:19 pm

karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
magnetowasright wrote:
karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
magnetowasright wrote:
karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
How many incels need to go on killing sprees before we stop talking about how unfair it is to judge people negatively for calling themselves incels?

This is in such poor taste, after Friday's shooting. This thread should be locked out of respect for the women who were murdered by a self-described incel.


Of course, the shooting is (like all shootings) tragic and inexcusable.

But posts like this are exactly why this thread is relevant. You point to some instances in which individuals who identify as incels carry out horrible acts of violence, and use them as justification to condemn all lonely men. We all readily acknowledge that as bigoted when it is done in regards to any other group.

And Incel is not something I call myself; it's a reality of my existence. I'm getting pretty fed up with having to repeat this.

How many Muslims need to go on killing sprees before we stop talking about how unfair it is to judge people negatively for calling themselves Muslims?

F***ing SJWs and your bullsh!t double standards!

And by the way, this thread was started on October 27. In case you're bad at math, that was a whole week before Friday. Just an FYI.


I very clearly stated (twice) in my brief comment that I was talking about people who identify as incels, not lonely people (because not all lonely people call themselves incels.)

I realize the thread was started before the shooting, but now that the shooting has happened I think it's disrespectful of the victims to let it continue. I would say the same about a thread defending anti-Semitic rhetoric that was started before the Tree of Life shooting, that after the shooting it should be locked out of respect for the victims of that anti-Semitic murderous attack.

I'm not even going to address the ridiculous "SJW" hyperbole directly because it's not worth my time or energy.


The topic of this thread is not analogous to an anti-Semitic thread because it is not anti-women or any other group. It exists to defend the thousands of non-violent lonely men lime myself who are constantly compared unfairly to the likes of Elliot Rodger.

Every time a shooting like this does occur, thousands of men whose only crime is being socially awkward and lonely (often due to falling on the Autism Spectrum) are treated by everyone around like they're monsters. Which is why this topic is particularly relevant in the wake of Friday's shooting and is in no way disrespectful to the victims.

Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a number of politicians and celebrities around the US and world came out to remind everyone that the terrorists do not represent all Muslims and that the majority of Muslims are kind and peaceful people. From your point of view, that was disrespectful to the victims as well. Right?

In fact, the only way anyone can consider it disrespectful is if you think all lonely men are responsible for or endorse such crimes.

Here are your own words: "How many incels need to go on killing sprees before we stop talking about how unfair it is to judge people negatively for calling themselves incels?"

Your own comment reveals that you simply want to use these tragedies as an excuse to rationalize your bigotry. You speak out both sides of your mouth, first proclaiming "all incels", but then trying to backpedal when called out on your bigotry to claim you only meant a specific narrow group of incels. Nice try, but your words are right here for all to see.


This is a false analogy. What would be a better analogy would be to compare lonely men to muslims and men who identify as incel and belong to incel forums as an extremist group like ISIS. When there are terrorist attacks people look at extremist groups like ISIS because the terrorist will claim to be from a group like that or Al Queda or whatever, not just a muslim. As the shooter on Friday identified as an woman-hating extremist incel and not just a lonely man.


Which is exactly the point I've been making all along. But apparently, that's disrespectful to the victims.

And I would add, in this analogy, that people like you are analogous to Fox News and the Right; pointing to the actions of a fringe minority to rationalize their bigoted attitudes towards a whole diverse group of people.

karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
I have no bigotry against lonely men, I only have disdain for men who identify with terrorist incels like Friday's shooter. Please stop putting words in my mouth that I didn't say, it only makes you look like the one with an agenda here and it makes it hard to take your arguments seriously.


And just where exactly did I or anyone else in this thread say we identify with the shooters?

Nobody is putting words in your mouth you didn't say. Here are your words copied and pasted without alteration:

"How many incels need to go on killing sprees before we stop talking about how unfair it is to judge people negatively for calling themselves incels?"

And as Face-of-Boo pointed out, this is nothing new. You are constantly spamming any thread related to the matter of lonely Autistics seeking support with links to misogynist forums in an attempt to conflate us with these types of toxic individuals.

You come in here and accuse us of supporting violence, say we're disrespecting the victims of said violence, make sweeping generalizations comparing us to murders, and demand that we are silenced. And then you get the gall to say I'm putting words in your mouth?!

And by the way, we're still here 8)



Last edited by magnetowasright on 05 Nov 2018, 11:44 pm, edited 4 times in total.

CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,297
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

05 Nov 2018, 11:27 pm

There was an incel guy who was in my college programme. One day when we were watching a comedian perform in the cafeteria, a Redneck who was in the same programme put a condom in front of the guy who happened to be my best friend at the time. I was so pissed off that I didn't talk to him for the rest of the year (1994).

The comedian said, "You can put that on your own big banana!" I gave him a thumbs up.


_________________
The Family Enigma


Last edited by CockneyRebel on 05 Nov 2018, 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

LuigiGates
Butterfly
Butterfly

Joined: 5 Nov 2018
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 14
Location: Baltimore, Maryland United States

05 Nov 2018, 11:29 pm

For the most part, any bigotry against involuntarily celibate men stems from a desire to feel superior. The quick and convenient thing to do is to find an easy target, and there is no easier target then men who can't get laid. I'll bet the sex lives of those who go out of their way to feel superior to incels isn't all that great either.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,103
Location: Adelaide, Australia

06 Nov 2018, 1:05 am

The term Incel sounds like Newspeak from Nineteen Eighty-Four. Ministry of Truth becomes Minitrue, Ministry of Love becomes Miniluv and now Involuntary Celibacy becomes Incel.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


Aspie19828
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 336

06 Nov 2018, 1:37 am

Most incels spend way too much time in their bedroom, crying poor me, why me? They post on forums, make videos and cry: "Poor me, why me?" They have their excuses/reasons why they are unwanted and hated by society: like small wrists, too short, too bald, too fat, small frame, no job, not rich, etc. MGTOW is the best way and average men can spend their time on themselves and do what they want and make better use of their lives.



xDominiel
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 199

06 Nov 2018, 2:23 am

Aspie19828 wrote:
The majority of incels are living in rich countries and are mainly frustrated white males. It is a first world problem. In third world countries people have far more important issues enough food, water and housing, etc and living another day.

Aspie19828 wrote:
Incels are more likely narcissistic sociopaths or schizoids than Aspies. Incels have the inability to show empathy because they do not have feelings. Elliot Rodger was a narcissistic sociopath with mental health issues including depression and social anxiety.

Aspie19828 wrote:
Most incels spend way too much time in their bedroom, crying poor me, why me? They post on forums, make videos and cry: "Poor me, why me?" They have their excuses/reasons why they are unwanted and hated by society: like small wrists, too short, too bald, too fat, small frame, no job, not rich, etc.

You *really* don't like them, do you? :wink:

Aspie19828 wrote:
MGTOW is the best way and average men can spend their time on themselves and do what they want and make better use of their lives.

That's a bit ironic considering that the whole MGTOW thing is usually seen in the same light as the incel community. Do you consider yourself part of that movement?



Aspie19828
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 336

06 Nov 2018, 2:39 am

I identify as MGTOW. I spend my life focusing on me and my interests. I do not want to waste time being depressed, negative, self pity, bitterness, resentment, frustrated. I have accepted I do not need women in my life. I have control over my life and I do what I want with my life. I do not buy into the Hollywood hype or the western media propaganda that being in a relationship is important. More incels need to realise they can be strong on their own and they do not need women in their lives and there is no need worrying about them.



xDominiel
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 199

06 Nov 2018, 2:59 am

Aspie19828 wrote:
I spend my life focusing on me and my interests. I do not want to waste time being depressed, negative, self pity, bitterness, resentment, frustrated. I have accepted I do not need women in my life. I have control over my life and I do what I want with my life. I do not buy into the Hollywood hype or the western media propaganda that being in a relationship is important. More incels need to realise they can be strong on their own and they do not need women in their lives and there is no need worrying about them.

Honestly, that's all a pretty good way to go about it. As painful as it is for many to be alone, a lot could probably find themselves in a slightly better place if they managed to shift their focus onto something else (and I know that it isn't easy). Maybe it could even be possible to find a way to channel the frustration into something more constructive. I like to think that in the future we'll come up with a good alternative outlet for those who have fallen outside or been left behind anyway. Whether that'll be robots, virtual reality or whatnot. I'm pretty excited to see what we'll manage with artificial intelligence, myself. 8)



MushroomPrincess
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 335
Location: Turtle Island

06 Nov 2018, 3:21 am

goldfish21 wrote:
MushroomPrincess wrote:
It's hard to have sympathy for "involuntarily celibate men", considering that voluntarily celibate men (read: clergy) are among the most privileged class on the planet.


:roll:

This might be the single dumbest thing I’ve ever read on wrong planet.

So clergy aren't the most privileged class on the planet? The Pope doesn't influence the lives of billions of people?

What's "dumb" about what I said? Communicate what you're trying to say.

The Pope is celibate and he's one of the most powerful men on the planet (it should be noted that celibate women don't traditionally wield much institutional power). Doesn't this prove that sex isn't really that big of a deal and that we shouldn't pity the incelibate male as if he's enduring some terrible hardship?



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,106
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

06 Nov 2018, 3:23 am

xDominiel wrote:
Aspie19828 wrote:
I spend my life focusing on me and my interests. I do not want to waste time being depressed, negative, self pity, bitterness, resentment, frustrated. I have accepted I do not need women in my life. I have control over my life and I do what I want with my life. I do not buy into the Hollywood hype or the western media propaganda that being in a relationship is important. More incels need to realise they can be strong on their own and they do not need women in their lives and there is no need worrying about them.

Honestly, that's all a pretty good way to go about it. As painful as it is for many to be alone, a lot could probably find themselves in a slightly better place if they managed to shift their focus onto something else (and I know that it isn't easy). Maybe it could even be possible to find a way to channel the frustration into something more constructive. I like to think that in the future we'll come up with a good alternative outlet for those who have fallen outside or been left behind anyway. Whether that'll be robots, virtual reality or whatnot. I'm pretty excited to see what we'll manage with artificial intelligence, myself. 8)



Image