My gf seems to be bothered that I am 'white and privileged'.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,505
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Just out curiosity is she close to her native heritage? or is she more an 'Elizabeth Warren" type in that she is 1/100 or 1/1000 indigenous and has kind of adopted the identity?
Cringe.
This is the sort of gatekeeping that if you're not indigenous you probably shouldn't engage towards indigenous people.
_________________
I was ashamed of myself when I realised life was a costume party and I attended with my real face
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell
Just out curiosity is she close to her native heritage? or is she more an 'Elizabeth Warren" type in that she is 1/100 or 1/1000 indigenous and has kind of adopted the identity?
Cringe.
This is the sort of gatekeeping that if you're not indigenous you probably shouldn't engage towards indigenous people.
Yeah I know, but honestly it's not for my benefit, ironpony is in a relationship with this girl and I am trying to help him make sense of his transgression and understand where his g/f is coming from in relation to her understanding of white privilege.
A white looking girl who has lived only among white people, who is dating a white man is not in a position to be lecturing ironpony having white privilege as she likely has benefited from it herself.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,505
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Just out curiosity is she close to her native heritage? or is she more an 'Elizabeth Warren" type in that she is 1/100 or 1/1000 indigenous and has kind of adopted the identity?
Cringe.
This is the sort of gatekeeping that if you're not indigenous you probably shouldn't engage towards indigenous people.
Yeah I know, but honestly it's not for my benefit, ironpony is in a relationship with this girl and I am trying to help him make sense of his transgression and understand where his g/f is coming from in relation to her understanding of white privilege.
A white looking girl who has lived only among white people, who is dating a white man is not in a position to be lecturing ironpony having white privilege as she likely has benefited from it herself.
A white guy with no connections to indigenous cultures whatsoever isn't going to do his relationship with an indigenous woman any favours by telling her she isn't indigenous enough to qualify as indigenous. That's between her and people who aren't him and he might just end up finding out that her connections are firmer than he's aware of, not that they don't exist.
Being white-passing doesn't make her not count as indigenous. Dating a white guy doesn't make her count as not indigenous. Not growing up thoroughly emerged in indigenous culture doesn't make her not indigenous.
While different nations are entitled to define their membership as they see fit it's not uncommon for nations to have policies of openly welcoming those who can trace their ancestry to that nation to 'rejoin the circle' and embrace their heritage. People who aren't members of those nations have no right whatsoever to try to tell members of those nations that they're not "native enough" to actually count.
Getting butthurt over someone pointing out 'hey, you have blindspots' seems like more of a problem than having them pointed out.
_________________
I was ashamed of myself when I realised life was a costume party and I attended with my real face
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell
Sure, it's her identity and she's entitled to feel that way. However lecturing her b/f over white privilege when she's a recipient of exactly the same benefits means she doesn't understand the concept,
A more appropriate way to discuss this with her b/f is to just point out he has "blindspots" rather than suddenly call him out for being "white". Sorry don't buy it.
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Just out curiosity is she close to her native heritage? or is she more an 'Elizabeth Warren" type in that she is 1/100 or 1/1000 indigenous and has kind of adopted the identity?
Cringe.
This is the sort of gatekeeping that if you're not indigenous you probably shouldn't engage towards indigenous people.
Yeah I know, but honestly it's not for my benefit, ironpony is in a relationship with this girl and I am trying to help him make sense of his transgression and understand where his g/f is coming from in relation to her understanding of white privilege.
A white looking girl who has lived only among white people, who is dating a white man is not in a position to be lecturing ironpony having white privilege as she likely has benefited from it herself.
A white guy with no connections to indigenous cultures whatsoever isn't going to do his relationship with an indigenous woman any favours by telling her she isn't indigenous enough to qualify as indigenous. That's between her and people who aren't him and he might just end up finding out that her connections are firmer than he's aware of, not that they don't exist.
Being white-passing doesn't make her not count as indigenous. Dating a white guy doesn't make her count as not indigenous. Not growing up thoroughly emerged in indigenous culture doesn't make her not indigenous.
While different nations are entitled to define their membership as they see fit it's not uncommon for nations to have policies of openly welcoming those who can trace their ancestry to that nation to 'rejoin the circle' and embrace their heritage. People who aren't members of those nations have no right whatsoever to try to tell members of those nations that they're not "native enough" to actually count.
Getting butthurt over someone pointing out 'hey, you have blindspots' seems like more of a problem than having them pointed out.
But it’s not an excuse for being a hypocrite, either. If you rail against white privilege but enjoy the benefits of it, that’s a problem. And it doesn’t even matter if she’s full-blooded or just 0.0001, she’s dating a white guy who is supposedly privileged.
I don’t think the relationship has any serious problems. Just a general observation here: I wouldn’t date anyone that I’d want to change—or who would wan to change me. CRT demands an admission of guilt, basically. Even though you might never intend to change a thing, the whole point of admitting you’re wrong about something, whether within CRT or not, is for things to change at some point.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,505
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Sure, it's her identity and she's entitled to feel that way. However lecturing her b/f over white privilege when she's a recipient of exactly the same benefits means she doesn't understand the concept,
A more appropriate way to discuss this with her b/f is to just point out he has "blindspots" rather than suddenly call him out for being "white". Sorry don't buy it.
Her approach might not be the best or there might be details missing. Either way advising him to pick a fight with her probably isn't going to lead to a positive outcome, especially if it's handled without much nuance or understanding.
_________________
I was ashamed of myself when I realised life was a costume party and I attended with my real face
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,505
Location: Right over your left shoulder
You criticize society's flaws and yet you continue to exist within said society, that's a problem.
I see. By that logic white passing relatives shouldn't speak up over differences in treatment they've experienced compared to not white passing relatives. That's absurd logic.
_________________
I was ashamed of myself when I realised life was a costume party and I attended with my real face
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell
I'm not actually asking him to pick a fight, I am asking him to politely ask his g/f to explain what she mean't, If you read my advice to ironpony, it was options. In none of them am I asking him to try and change her,
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,077
Location: Adelaide, Australia
You criticize society's flaws and yet you continue to exist within said society, that's a problem.
I see. By that logic white passing relatives shouldn't speak up over differences in treatment they've experienced compared to not white passing relatives. That's absurd logic.
Exactly
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
You criticize society's flaws and yet you continue to exist within said society, that's a problem.
I see. By that logic white passing relatives shouldn't speak up over differences in treatment they've experienced compared to not white passing relatives. That's absurd logic.
Straw man argument. I didn’t say that at all.
Of course it’s absurd, because you don’t choose the society you’re born into. Similarly, you don’t get to choose when you’re a victim of human trafficking or arranged marriage (assuming you don’t get a choice, that is, whether to break with tradition or whatever).
It’s not a matter of society, though. She could choose to date within her own race or culture. Nobody is forcing her to date a white guy. The argument could be made that she’s looting his privilege and betraying her own people. If she makes the CHOICE to date him and enjoys the upward mobility that comes with it AND complains about privilege, she should check her OWN privilege. It doesn’t make her a bad person. It just makes her a hypocrite.
As this discussion has gone on for 10 days and 10 pages on the desktop site, let me give a different take on this.
She has come to realize that she's in this relationship and it has dawned on her that it would be difficult for her to leave. That doesn't mean she intends to leave, but she doubts her own level of commitment. Remember she is very young. She is thinking of things that might possibly jeopardize her long-term happiness if she ends up being with the OP for the rest of her life or at least a long time, and testing the relationship in this way.
I was in a relationship with somebody 6 years younger and from what she told me later, she was in the relationship mostly due to physical attraction but she had doubts as to whether I was the right life partner for her. One time I mentioned the War in Vietnam and she replied by saying that I should know she was too young to remember that (I was born in 1952 and she was born in 1959) with the implication that this could be a red flag in our relationship. She could have simply dumped me any time had she wished.
This is a good reason to simply not obsess over this type of thing. If the OP takes it in stride she'll probably move on to some other conversational topic.
She has come to realize that she's in this relationship and it has dawned on her that it would be difficult for her to leave. That doesn't mean she intends to leave, but she doubts her own level of commitment. Remember she is very young. She is thinking of things that might possibly jeopardize her long-term happiness if she ends up being with the OP for the rest of her life or at least a long time, and testing the relationship in this way.
I was in a relationship with somebody 6 years younger and from what she told me later, she was in the relationship mostly due to physical attraction but she had doubts as to whether I was the right life partner for her. One time I mentioned the War in Vietnam and she replied by saying that I should know she was too young to remember that (I was born in 1952 and she was born in 1959) with the implication that this could be a red flag in our relationship. She could have simply dumped me any time had she wished.
This is a good reason to simply not obsess over this type of thing. If the OP takes it in stride she'll probably move on to some other conversational topic.
I agree. This is a major sh-t test on her part.
She has come to realize that she's in this relationship and it has dawned on her that it would be difficult for her to leave. That doesn't mean she intends to leave, but she doubts her own level of commitment. Remember she is very young. She is thinking of things that might possibly jeopardize her long-term happiness if she ends up being with the OP for the rest of her life or at least a long time, and testing the relationship in this way.
I was in a relationship with somebody 6 years younger and from what she told me later, she was in the relationship mostly due to physical attraction but she had doubts as to whether I was the right life partner for her. One time I mentioned the War in Vietnam and she replied by saying that I should know she was too young to remember that (I was born in 1952 and she was born in 1959) with the implication that this could be a red flag in our relationship. She could have simply dumped me any time had she wished.
This is a good reason to simply not obsess over this type of thing. If the OP takes it in stride she'll probably move on to some other conversational topic.
I agree. This is a major sh-t test on her part.
I wouldn't call this a s**t test, I just wanted to say that the political issues aren't really relevant. The OP should simply express his intention to do better if he is asked and otherwise not overreact or dwell on the topic, in particular he should not raise this topic on his own.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Trump's White House Chief of Staff calls him a fascist |
23 Oct 2024, 4:16 am |
Trump picks first woman White House Chief Of Staff |
09 Nov 2024, 10:59 pm |
Black and white thinking and "doubt-mongering" |
10 Oct 2024, 4:01 am |