Majority of autistuc men dont have a girlfriend?
IsabellaLinton wrote:
Women can date whoever makes them feel safe and comfortable.
Incels do themselves a disservice by expressing hostility and prejudice toward an entire gender, most of whom they haven't even met, so tbh - if a dude believes that nonsense then his harsh critique of women is the main reason he won't be gettin any. Maybe if these men could shut up about how horrible women are and realise the hypocrisy in their attitude, they'd at least be able to attract female friends.
Incels do themselves a disservice by expressing hostility and prejudice toward an entire gender, most of whom they haven't even met, so tbh - if a dude believes that nonsense then his harsh critique of women is the main reason he won't be gettin any. Maybe if these men could shut up about how horrible women are and realise the hypocrisy in their attitude, they'd at least be able to attract female friends.
their isolation is what creates a fertile ground for toxic manipulation and extremism.
TwilightPrincess wrote:
Women also often worry about embarrassing themselves as well as the guy. It can be extremely awkward to interact with a virtual stranger which is why I generally think that the cold approach is a bad idea. Typically, I would prefer not to be approached at all because it makes me anxious.
If I get rejected by a woman, I find it too awkward to cross paths with her ever again.
This means cold approaches with a woman I don't know (and am highly unlikely to run into ever again) are pretty much my only option.
I suppose there's also online dating/hookup sites. Or hoping a woman makes a move on me in person. Or allowing a date/intercourse to just sort of happen (with neither party making the move). I've had successes with these methods.
The "get to know a woman well, ask her out" approach, however, even though it logically makes the most sense (and is more likely to lead to success than a cold approach), is unfortunately out of the question for me.
cyberdad wrote:
TwilightPrincess wrote:
Women also often worry about embarrassing themselves as well as the guy. It can be extremely awkward to interact with a virtual stranger which is why I generally think that the cold approach is a bad idea. I would prefer not to be approached at all because it makes me anxious.
I get it, putting my brain back in my younger self, I didn't really think about what women go through so my excuse was selective ignorance. I think this sought of mindset would be changed by government advertising on the topic of female harrassment. If young men could see what women were thinking (in a kind of simulated real time) it would change their attitude when seeking female friends or (what is a serious issue right now) how they treat women on dating apps.
The problem is a lot of men on the spectrum unknowingly "harass" a woman, not out of bad intent but social ineptitude.
Keyword unknowingly. It's impossible to change a behavior we don't even realize is wrong.
cyberdad wrote:
Yes, unfortunately the men who end up abusers are capable of concealing their dark qualities.
Some abusers definitely hide it, no doubt.
Here's what I don't get though: Career felons/bad boys/drug dealers/etc can easily get dates/sex, despite really being dangerous (and they obviously don't hide it)
Yet men on the spectrum struggle to get dates/sex because we're perceived as dangerous.
cyberdad wrote:
TwilightPrincess wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
that's a trend right? life as a single woman who maintains a circle of close friends > being lumbered with a male (like a ball and chain)
Is that what you're getting out of this current conversation?
No, that doesn't describe my experience of being in an abusive relationship. Abusers tend to isolate you from your friends.
I am not getting personal (how did that happen?) a trend happening in many parts of the world is women prefer being single rather than being in a relationship > men. that doesn't mean all women, but the trend is moving upward
Record numbers of young men are dropping out of the dating game too. And I read somewhere that it's becoming more and more common for men to reach their 30th birthday without ever getting kissed.
IsabellaLinton wrote:
It's because women are no longer forced to marry men for financial reasons.
We can make our own money now.
We can even vote and make decisions.
It's also acceptable to come out as LBGTQ and asexual or aromantic.
We can make our own money now.
We can even vote and make decisions.
It's also acceptable to come out as LBGTQ and asexual or aromantic.
Even though I'm heterosexual, I've been told I'm aromantic.
TwilightPrincess wrote:
I think I tend to have a harder time understanding men because they are socialized to be more guarded when it comes to expressing their emotions whereas women are often more open about that stuff. Perhaps relatedly, I also struggled to know what men’s motivations were concerning L&D at different points and to varying degrees.
With that being said, I was only speaking in general terms. I think people can be difficult to understand for any number of reasons. In person, people have trouble understanding me because I’m extremely shy and tend to have a flat affect. I don’t usually express much emotion unless I’m really comfortable with someone or it’s an extreme situation.
With that being said, I was only speaking in general terms. I think people can be difficult to understand for any number of reasons. In person, people have trouble understanding me because I’m extremely shy and tend to have a flat affect. I don’t usually express much emotion unless I’m really comfortable with someone or it’s an extreme situation.
I understand.
It's a double-eged sword really. Women are expected to show more of an emotional range. However, this comes at the expense of being seen as irrational and overly dramatic.
Whereas men are expected to be more stoic. The downside to this is emotional suppression and a lack of support. A lack of network which leads to a cultural sense of loneliness.
We still have artefacts from eras before us. From times where people would diagnose women with hysteria and view men as 'not real men' for seeking emotional support.
We've moved on from times where marriage was an economic necessity if you wanted to survive comfortably as a woman. It is no longer a need but a want. Not even a want for some, as marriage becomes a less common end goal.
Marriage, relationships, dating - they are spurred out of a desire for connection rather than to prevent wars (such as with tactical marriages in monarchies) or to lower the risk of ending up in poverty.
Instead of competing with other men, realistically men are competing with a woman's solitude.
As a society, we are becoming far more aware of domestic abuse, power dynamics and serial killers.
This has created an understandable caution. Men are bigger and stronger. It's not always easy to tell someone's intent. Sometimes a person can end up to be a wolf in sheep's clothing.
However, I will say that this has created a concerning double standard. People tend to underestimate the threat that women can pose. Women kill. They stalk. They drug. They can do some horrendous things. It is worrying when I see headlines that try to paint a female teacher raping a male child as anything but horrifying.
Ultimately, it comes down to the perception that men have motive but women lack agency. Things happen to women, women don't make them happen. Which isn't true, but it's a perception that is routed in history and continues to persist in more subtle ways. We can't seem to shake it. This harms everyone.
It's a tricky subject to bring up as it's sometimes used to talk over the disturbingly high statistics of violence against women by men. That is not my intent.
I likely have more to say on this but I need to rest up for my upcoming interviews. I'll probably return to this thread.
_________________
Support human artists! Do not let the craft die.
25. Near the spectrum but not on it.
SkinnyElephant wrote:
The problem is a lot of men on the spectrum unknowingly "harass" a woman, not out of bad intent but social ineptitude.
Keyword unknowingly. It's impossible to change a behavior we don't even realize is wrong.
Keyword unknowingly. It's impossible to change a behavior we don't even realize is wrong.
Granted. It may take considerable practice for some men and lots of humiliation and potential trouble.
SkinnyElephant wrote:
Here's what I don't get though: Career felons/bad boys/drug dealers/etc can easily get dates/sex, despite really being dangerous (and they obviously don't hide it).
there is evidence that some women (please don't come after me) are drawn to this "type" but I don't want to generalise. When I was a young man a 20yr old who was a "christian" chose to friend zone me but started seeing some loser dude who happened to have a motorcycle and was a little bit "edgy" and into the drug scene. When I posed the question she said she loved riding on a motorbike....and that shallow feeling was enough to sleep with him and not me. But that's my experience and her specific behaviour may not be general to all women.
Last edited by cyberdad on 15 Jul 2024, 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SkinnyElephant wrote:
Record numbers of young men are dropping out of the dating game too. And I read somewhere that it's becoming more and more common for men to reach their 30th birthday without ever getting kissed.
I think the trend is somewhat approaching what's already happening in South Korea and Japan where young people (male and female) are rejecting family expectations. I also thing COVID accelerated social isolation in young people. All of these trends make things more difficult but it should not stop you trying to make female friends.
Lost_dragon wrote:
TwilightPrincess wrote:
I think I tend to have a harder time understanding men because they are socialized to be more guarded when it comes to expressing their emotions whereas women are often more open about that stuff. Perhaps relatedly, I also struggled to know what men’s motivations were concerning L&D at different points and to varying degrees.
With that being said, I was only speaking in general terms. I think people can be difficult to understand for any number of reasons. In person, people have trouble understanding me because I’m extremely shy and tend to have a flat affect. I don’t usually express much emotion unless I’m really comfortable with someone or it’s an extreme situation.
As a society, we are becoming far more aware of domestic abuse, power dynamics and serial killers.With that being said, I was only speaking in general terms. I think people can be difficult to understand for any number of reasons. In person, people have trouble understanding me because I’m extremely shy and tend to have a flat affect. I don’t usually express much emotion unless I’m really comfortable with someone or it’s an extreme situation.
This has created an understandable caution. Men are bigger and stronger. It's not always easy to tell someone's intent. Sometimes a person can end up to be a wolf in sheep's clothing.
However, I will say that this has created a concerning double standard. People tend to underestimate the threat that women can pose. Women kill. They stalk. They drug. They can do some horrendous things. It is worrying when I see headlines that try to paint a female teacher raping a male child as anything but horrifying.
I was only speaking about why I personally tend to have more trouble understanding men than women. I wasn’t really trying to make an overall statement about one sex being worse than the other. The vast majority of my abuse was perpetrated by men in situations where I lacked agency, but obviously, that doesn’t mean that women aren’t capable of horrific behavior too.
Where I live, there still isn’t enough awareness concerning domestic violence, sexual harassment, or sexual assault when it comes to any gender. There still seems to be a lack of awareness on WP.
When I said that I struggled to know men’s motivations concerning L&D, I wasn’t just thinking about abuse but also about more fundamental stuff like: “Does he like me?” “What is he looking for?” Stuff like that. There was a time or two when I was interested in a romantic relationship with a specific person, but it turned out that they were solely interested in a fling. I also didn’t always recognize interest until after the fact.
Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 15 Jul 2024, 5:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
cyberdad wrote:
SkinnyElephant wrote:
Here's what I don't get though: Career felons/bad boys/drug dealers/etc can easily get dates/sex, despite really being dangerous (and they obviously don't hide it).
there is evidence that some women (please don't come after me) are drawn to this "type" but I don't want to generalise. When I was a young man a 20yr old who was a "christian" chose to friend zone me but started seeing some loser dude who happened to have a motorcycle and was a little bit "edgy" and into the drug scene. When I posed the question she said she loved riding on a motorbike....and that shallow feeling was enough to sleep with him and not me. But that's my experience and her specific behaviour may not be general to all women.
Some women are career felons, bad girls, and drug dealers / drug users too. Maybe that's how they meet these people and why they're attracted. As for more traditional women liking bad boys I suspect they think the guy will be tough enough to protect them from other men. That whole "knight in shining armour" thing is drummed into our heads in all storybooks from the time we're coherent toddlers and most of us won't meet a prince, so perhaps a guy with a bike seems just as good.
The only part of "bad boys" I like is when men are countercultural by standing up for what they believe is right even if it's against the mainstream narrative - breaking the law to help another person, refusing to conform to groupthink, having their own code of ethics etc. I know lots of bikers and they're the nicest men I've ever met who would do anything to help another person, and I don't mean that they'd kill someone. They'd just give you the shirt off their back if you needed it. Most of them are really softspoken sweethearts. As for felons and dealers - maybe not. They could still be good people but I'd be too scared of getting caught up in that kind of thing.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,152
Location: Right over your left shoulder
SkinnyElephant wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Yes, unfortunately the men who end up abusers are capable of concealing their dark qualities.
Some abusers definitely hide it, no doubt.
Here's what I don't get though: Career felons/bad boys/drug dealers/etc can easily get dates/sex, despite really being dangerous (and they obviously don't hide it)
Yet men on the spectrum struggle to get dates/sex because we're perceived as dangerous.
It's because we're perceived as the wrong type of dangerous.
No one wants to deal with a boring, controlling, obsessive partner. Villains are viewed as dangerous to other people, not to the one interested in having that excitement in their life. It also often carries the notion of becoming bad vicariously through association.
It seems like a flavour of everybody wanna be gangsta until it's time to do gangsta s**t. The people for whom associating with dangerous people is alluring are usually only interested in it until the desirable villain starts treating them the same way they treat other people.
It's also not something limited to women. There's men (and women) for whom bad b*****s are a fantasy too. Same idea though, those people are often fun in the short term until they make you their next victim.
_________________
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell
IsabellaLinton wrote:
The only part of "bad boys" I like is when men are countercultural by standing up for what they believe is right even if it's against the mainstream narrative - breaking the law to help another person, refusing to conform to groupthink, having their own code of ethics etc. I know lots of bikers and they're the nicest men I've ever met who would do anything to help another person, and I don't mean that they'd kill someone. They'd just give you the shirt off their back if you needed it. Most of them are really softspoken sweethearts. As for felons and dealers - maybe not. They could still be good people but I'd be too scared of getting caught up in that kind of thing.
Yeah "no shade" on bikers, my parents oldest friends became bikers and did the whole Harley Davison and leather jacket thing. Yeah, I think the stereotype that young men do the "James Dean" thing and be part of a counterculture can be seen as attractive and exhilarating. I was probably just ordinary run-in the mill in comparison.
cyberdad wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
Oh sorry. I thought you meant something I said. A lot of Incel media pushes the narrative that women are bad, selfish people who don't date because we think we're too good for men.
Given the recent trump shooter shows the hallmarks of an incel I am guessing their narrative will be on the news again as some type of danger to society. I think incel media push the false narrative women are selfish and save themselves for only the top alpha males in terms of looks/money/status. this causes resentment in some incels who give up and develop a pathological hatred of women. But I am sure this does not include the vast majority of autistic males who only want to make friends with females.
Fascinating. I hadn't heard either way whether the Trump shooter was an incel.
I recall 10 years ago that incel Elliot Rodger went on a rampage. It just so happens Elliot was on the spectrum.
I'm going to start by saying I don't condone Elliot's actions on his final day. That being said, I understand his frustration.
Elliott had good looks, wealthy parents, and drove a luxury car. Statistically, one would expect him to be a stud. Yet he made it to 22 without ever getting a date or sex. And his college career forced him to see lots of uglier dudes with no problem getting girls.
I've heard armchair psychologists online say Elliot could have gotten dates/sex if only he talked to/asked out more girls.
Here's what these armchair psychologists fail to take into account: On top of being on the spectrum, Elliot had crippling social phobia.
The mere thought of asking a woman out makes my heart pound a mile a minute, makes me get so choked up I can barely speak, and makes me so shaky I could fall over at any second. Chances are Elliot (because of his social phobia) would have displayed the same characteristics if he asked anyone out.
If a guy is exhibiting the symptoms I described (racing heart, so choked up he can barely speak, so shaky he could fall over at any second), virtually no woman is going to accept his advances, even if she's physically attracted to him.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
John Thune new Senate Majority leader |
13 Nov 2024, 4:12 pm |
Advice regarding girlfriend |
30 Oct 2024, 8:33 am |
My brother attracted to his mates girlfriend |
04 Oct 2024, 7:13 pm |
Republican makes Tammy Baldwin’s girlfriend an issue |
02 Nov 2024, 5:14 pm |