roadGames wrote:
Perhaps the social worth some of us aspie males perceive ourselves as having is an inflated misinterpretation of the actual social worth we have as perceived by others. Furthermore, perhaps this misinterpretation itself is a byproduct of our difficulties with social behavior in general.
I think you're really onto something here, but if I'm at all like the average aspie, I'd rephrase this to say that we don't understand why social worth seems to be the be-all and end-all when it comes to who gets attention and who doesn't.
I know I judge people based on individual worth, i.e. if I personally find them attractive, interesting, someone I could learn from, etc., not based on their standing in the social world. I often assume, possibly mistakenly, that others do the same, so that as long as there's *something* unique about me, I think that girls will want to get to know me just to "try me out". However, there are seriously girls who dislike guys just because their friends don't like the guy. I wouldn't be caught dead doing that.
It also may be that for women, social and individual worth are more correlated than for guys. This is because many girls seem to take a strategy where one of their main priorities is to be attractive to guys, whereas for many guys being attractive to women seems to be secondary to career success, athletic or creative accomplishments, etc. I don't know how much of this difference is cultural and how much is biological. But the result is that for females, personal and social success go hand in hand almost by definition--whereas a man can be a prolific novelist or accomplished scientist, and have great personal interest to people in those fields, yet not be high on the general social ladder.