pick up line
0_equals_true wrote:
Hey you do Wing Chun too?
Why not cut to the chase, skip the 'do you want to talk about supercoc?', they might well think it is a crock (of sh**).
Just say 'did you know they recently found recently discovered that 110 million years ago there were crocs that grew to about 40 feet long and ate dinosaurs?'
It is not a chat up line it is just conversation, if they wish to bow out don't take it personally.
Why not cut to the chase, skip the 'do you want to talk about supercoc?', they might well think it is a crock (of sh**).
Just say 'did you know they recently found recently discovered that 110 million years ago there were crocs that grew to about 40 feet long and ate dinosaurs?'
It is not a chat up line it is just conversation, if they wish to bow out don't take it personally.
is that the same as Deinosuchus or something else?
lotusblossom wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
Hey you do Wing Chun too?
Why not cut to the chase, skip the 'do you want to talk about supercoc?', they might well think it is a crock (of sh**).
Just say 'did you know they recently found recently discovered that 110 million years ago there were crocs that grew to about 40 feet long and ate dinosaurs?'
It is not a chat up line it is just conversation, if they wish to bow out don't take it personally.
Why not cut to the chase, skip the 'do you want to talk about supercoc?', they might well think it is a crock (of sh**).
Just say 'did you know they recently found recently discovered that 110 million years ago there were crocs that grew to about 40 feet long and ate dinosaurs?'
It is not a chat up line it is just conversation, if they wish to bow out don't take it personally.
is that the same as Deinosuchus or something else?
um idk, what i read is that it's name is Sarcosuchus imperator
BongSao wrote:
lotusblossom wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
Hey you do Wing Chun too?
Why not cut to the chase, skip the 'do you want to talk about supercoc?', they might well think it is a crock (of sh**).
Just say 'did you know they recently found recently discovered that 110 million years ago there were crocs that grew to about 40 feet long and ate dinosaurs?'
It is not a chat up line it is just conversation, if they wish to bow out don't take it personally.
Why not cut to the chase, skip the 'do you want to talk about supercoc?', they might well think it is a crock (of sh**).
Just say 'did you know they recently found recently discovered that 110 million years ago there were crocs that grew to about 40 feet long and ate dinosaurs?'
It is not a chat up line it is just conversation, if they wish to bow out don't take it personally.
is that the same as Deinosuchus or something else?
um idk, what i read is that it's name is Sarcosuchus imperator
ok, Sarcosuchus is older and has a longer narrower head than Deinosuchus but was more likely to have ate fish not dinos.
racooneyes
Velociraptor
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 410
Location: blackeye, outer rim
racooneyes wrote:
lol imagine you went up to the girl and told her about supercroc and she corrected you like lotusblossoms post. Now that would be funny!
I was not correcting him I was just interested in if 'super croc' was Deinosuchus as I liked Deinosuchus when I read things on it.
<edit>
oh no I did correct him as I said Sarcosuchus was more likely to have ate fish not dinos
sorry Im very rude and argumentative
racooneyes
Velociraptor
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 410
Location: blackeye, outer rim
Yeah and I didn't explain what would be funny about it either lol just trying to freak someone out with an archeologogical pick up line assuming they know nothing of the subject and them turning round and knowing more than you do seemed amusing. Doesn't now I've explained it but there you go
_________________
read all the pamphlets and watch the tapes!
get all confused and then mix up the dates.
BongSao wrote:
racooneyes wrote:
lol imagine you went up to the girl and told her about supercroc and she corrected you like lotusblossoms post. Now that would be funny!
lmao i would probably get up and walk away at the ultimate backfire
yes that definately seems to be the effect I have on men when they talk to me
and guys say dating is easy for aspie women!
lotusblossom wrote:
BongSao wrote:
racooneyes wrote:
lol imagine you went up to the girl and told her about supercroc and she corrected you like lotusblossoms post. Now that would be funny!
lmao i would probably get up and walk away at the ultimate backfire
yes that definately seems to be the effect I have on men when they talk to me
and guys say dating is easy for aspie women!
lol well it would only have been because i would feel completely stupid and dont want to make more of an ass of myself than i already have
lotusblossom wrote:
yes that definately seems to be the effect I have on men when they talk to me
and guys say dating is easy for aspie women!
and guys say dating is easy for aspie women!
There's no way it can be as hard for Aspie women as it is for Aspie men, since men tend to be far more simplistic on an emotional level.
Nevertheless, while Aspie men can be more succesful with women if they become more confident about their masculinity, Aspie women can get more succesful with men if they lbecome more confident about their femininity. If you don't feel sexy yourself, men won't see you that way either.
Salonfilosoof wrote:
lotusblossom wrote:
yes that definately seems to be the effect I have on men when they talk to me
and guys say dating is easy for aspie women!
and guys say dating is easy for aspie women!
There's no way it can be as hard for Aspie women as it is for Aspie men, since men tend to be far more simplistic on an emotional level.
Nevertheless, while Aspie men can be more succesful with women if they become more confident about their masculinity, Aspie women can get more succesful with men if they lbecome more confident about their femininity. If you don't feel sexy yourself, men won't see you that way either.
lol Im very comfortable in my sexuality.
I think that dating and relationships are hard for both AS men and AS women as we all suffer from social communication problems which does not go down well with males or females NT or AS.
Its also what a person wants, of course I could get laid more easily than an AS male but thats not what I want, I think haveing a relationship is just as hard. Its also very difficult for AS women to know if a guy wants a relationship or just sex. I find men often would be happy to only have sex with me but draw the line at listening to long monologues on science and politics.
lotusblossom wrote:
I think that dating and relationships are hard for both AS men and AS women as we all suffer from social communication problems which does not go down well with males or females NT or AS.
I've just got the impression that neurotypical women are much more complex emotionally and therefore more difficult to get interested in you physically as an Aspie man. If you show enough interest in a man's interest, you can talk about all sorts of things and you present yourself as "available", any single man who's remotely physically attracted to you should be showing some interest. As a man, it seems so easy for a woman to manipulate us as their willful puppet as I see it around me all the time.
Although it must be harder to "use your femininity" in the battle of conquering a man because of your AS, I can't imagine your feminine mystique doesn't work at all
lotusblossom wrote:
Its also what a person wants, of course I could get laid more easily than an AS male but thats not what I want, I think haveing a relationship is just as hard. Its also very difficult for AS women to know if a guy wants a relationship or just sex. I find men often would be happy to only have sex with me but draw the line at listening to long monologues on science and politics.
Then don't get involved in any sexual activity with a man you don't feel confortable having discussions on science and politics with. I wouldn't recommend doing any monologues in any relationship. Debate, on the other hand, can be a more comfortable alternative. I suggest you find someone with mutual interests and only then engage in any sexual activity if you feel like you're comfortable with conversation and debate on topics that interest you.
But please, skip the monologues. Neurotypical people hate it when we keep on ranting about things no one in the room but ourselves are interested in. If he's interested, debate on it. That's a hell of a lot more fun than just rambling on your own monologue. And if he isn't interested, drop the topic. That's one thing I learned from interacting with other people....
Salonfilosoof wrote:
lotusblossom wrote:
I think that dating and relationships are hard for both AS men and AS women as we all suffer from social communication problems which does not go down well with males or females NT or AS.
I've just got the impression that neurotypical women are much more complex emotionally and therefore more difficult to get interested in you physically as an Aspie man. If you show enough interest in a man's interest, you can talk about all sorts of things and you present yourself as "available", any single man who's remotely physically attracted to you should be showing some interest. As a man, it seems so easy for a woman to manipulate us as their willful puppet as I see it around me all the time.
Although it must be harder to "use your femininity" in the battle of conquering a man because of your AS, I can't imagine your feminine mystique doesn't work at all
lotusblossom wrote:
Its also what a person wants, of course I could get laid more easily than an AS male but thats not what I want, I think haveing a relationship is just as hard. Its also very difficult for AS women to know if a guy wants a relationship or just sex. I find men often would be happy to only have sex with me but draw the line at listening to long monologues on science and politics.
Then don't get involved in any sexual activity with a man you don't feel confortable having discussions on science and politics with. I wouldn't recommend doing any monologues in any relationship. Debate, on the other hand, can be a more comfortable alternative. I suggest you find someone with mutual interests and only then engage in any sexual activity if you feel like you're comfortable with conversation and debate on topics that interest you.
But please, skip the monologues. Neurotypical people hate it when we keep on ranting about things no one in the room but ourselves are interested in. If he's interested, debate on it. That's a hell of a lot more fun than just rambling on your own monologue. And if he isn't interested, drop the topic. That's one thing I learned from interacting with other people....
it depends on how affected by AS the person is, my ex boyfriend with AS found it easy to not monologue and could read if others were bored or annoyed much more easily than me, I have always struggled with haveing a 2 way conversation and can not do it at all on things I have no interest in.
Men lie and tell me they are interested in all my special interests and it can take a longish time to find they were not interested in those things at all. I find that at the begining they often are keen on listening to me and like everything I do then after a bit my AS gets 'tired' for them and they show more discust and intollerance of my conversation and 'ways'.
lotusblossom wrote:
it depends on how affected by AS the person is, my ex boyfriend with AS found it easy to not monologue and could read if others were bored or annoyed much more easily than me, I have always struggled with haveing a 2 way conversation and can not do it at all on things I have no interest in.
There are some tricks. One trick is to use a lot of questions. Rather than actually say what you think, you ask what the other person thinks. Then, you compare his perspective with yours and give your conclusion. If your conclusion is very different from his, ask another question. By asking questions, you can avoid the conversation staying with one person. Of course, the questions should not be yes/no or multiple choice.
When they ask you questions, the trick is to come up with something that requires more than a sentence and that isn't too obvious to anyone in the room (if you point out the obvious, you look stupid). The more witty the remark, the better. If you can't really come up with anything, just say you don't know much more about it because you're not very familiar with the topic. Then, the other person will likely either make the topic easier to follow or move on to something else... depending on the context. Either way, always try to make a conversation a 2 way conversation instead of a monologue.
lotusblossom wrote:
Men lie and tell me they are interested in all my special interests and it can take a longish time to find they were not interested in those things at all. I find that at the begining they often are keen on listening to me and like everything I do then after a bit my AS gets 'tired' for them and they show more discust and intollerance of my conversation and 'ways'.
If it's any comfort, the same has happened with me. My exes always seemed to be fascinated by my elaborate explanations on whatever socio-political or philosophical concept I had pondered but as our relationship continued what used to be fascinating slowly turned irritating and they graduately lost interest in parallel.
So I guess it's not an issue of men vs women as much as it is an issue of Aspies vs NT people.
Salonfilosoof wrote:
lotusblossom wrote:
it depends on how affected by AS the person is, my ex boyfriend with AS found it easy to not monologue and could read if others were bored or annoyed much more easily than me, I have always struggled with haveing a 2 way conversation and can not do it at all on things I have no interest in.
There are some tricks. One trick is to use a lot of questions. Rather than actually say what you think, you ask what the other person thinks. Then, you compare his perspective with yours and give your conclusion. If your conclusion is very different from his, ask another question. By asking questions, you can avoid the conversation staying with one person. Of course, the questions should not be yes/no or multiple choice.
When they ask you questions, the trick is to come up with something that requires more than a sentence and that isn't too obvious to anyone in the room (if you point out the obvious, you look stupid). The more witty the remark, the better. If you can't really come up with anything, just say you don't know much more about it because you're not very familiar with the topic. Then, the other person will likely either make the topic easier to follow or move on to something else... depending on the context. Either way, always try to make a conversation a 2 way conversation instead of a monologue.
lotusblossom wrote:
Men lie and tell me they are interested in all my special interests and it can take a longish time to find they were not interested in those things at all. I find that at the begining they often are keen on listening to me and like everything I do then after a bit my AS gets 'tired' for them and they show more discust and intollerance of my conversation and 'ways'.
If it's any comfort, the same has happened with me. My exes always seemed to be fascinated by my elaborate explanations on whatever socio-political or philosophical concept I had pondered but as our relationship continued what used to be fascinating slowly turned irritating and they graduately lost interest in parallel.
So I guess it's not an issue of men vs women as much as it is an issue of Aspies vs NT people.
trust me other aspies are just as intollerant as NTs
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Don't pick your nose |
06 Jan 2025, 9:41 pm |
FIFA Club World Cub Pick 'Em 2025 |
01 Feb 2025, 4:57 pm |