makuranososhi wrote:
Some define NT as "not on the autistic spectrum" while others define it as "without any impairment whatsoever" - she's not on the spectrum, but deals with her own issues... so it would be dependent on whose definition one was using.
M.
I hadn't even noticed that... I
always assumed NT to mean literally, neurotypical. Meaning absent any developmental disorder, absent any type I personality disorder, absent any type II personality disorder, absent any schizophrenic spectrum disorder, and absent any form of neurological disorder.
Why in the world would you ever classify someone with say Avoidant Personality disorder, Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or Disassociative personality disorder as NT? That doesn't even make sense... that's like being a white person from Germany complaining about blacks, but including all the other whites from Europe while just saying blacks. It's illogical.
Im pretty sure all mental health and also things such as dyspraxia and dyslexia count as not NT. But I suppose someone could use the term in a loose fashion as in "all the mums at the toddler group were so NT" meaning chatty and socially skilled. Like all terms I think it has tighter and looser definitions depending on context.