Is romantic love "invented" by society or not?

Page 2 of 2 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

07 Jun 2010, 4:50 am

Janissy wrote:
The emotion is biological in origin. The vocabulary and conventions surrounding it were invented by society.

I looked at your link and somewhat disagree with the author. The emotion "fago", which is "compassion/love/sadness" is not unlike "any Western emotion". There is no such thing as "a Western emotion". There are human emotions felt by people all over the world. What differs is the vocabulary. Emotions which have cultural significance to a particular culture are given names. Those that are not, are not given names. Just because one does not have a name for an emotion does not mean that emotion is not felt. It merely means that emotion doesn't have enough importance to that particular culture to be given a name.


A very interesting view.



Cad
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 17 May 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 486
Location: Between zinc and mercury

07 Jun 2010, 5:49 am

Spazzergasm wrote:
I disagree with that theory.


Amen.



Pandoran-March
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 103

07 Jun 2010, 11:50 am

Asp-Z wrote:
There is a philosophical theory which says that emotions are social roles. We are meant to feel guilty when we do something wrong to dissuade us, and feel happy when we do something good to reward us - they are there to keep us abiding by society's values and expectations. Evidence for this exists in societies where they have emotions which are unheard of in other societies, for example the Japanese have the emotion amae, which is a feeling of dependency upon another’s love. This is similar to the feeling that children have towards their mothers, but it is experienced by adults, and the people of Ifaluk, a small island in the Pacific, have an emotion that they refer to as fago, which is “compassion/love/sadness” and is unlike any western emotion. Source link.

Given this, I believe that romantic love is also the same. It's a part of society, there to enforce the idea of family.

What are your thoughts on this?

While our emotions do run along with our cultural views, it would be a gross oversimplification to say that was the whole picture. Our entire range of feeling is based on natural phenomena. It's just that society tunes those feelings to specific situations, and outlets.

Individualism has taken off to the point that dependence on love is looked down on, and matching terms for Amae can be found in the conversation of any high school girl. I don't think many people have gone without hearing the terms 'clingy' and 'needy' in reference to some guy.

The Ifaluk's experience of Fago is something a lot of people experience, even here in America, but that doesn't mean we have a word for it. Don't you ever watch romantic comedies, and see these people struggle to define what they're feeling? The only difference is that we don't have a word for it, and that's part of what seems to make it so meaningful.

For the most part, emotions are universal among human society. The only difference is how those emotions are directed, for what end, and how they define it. The experience is relatively unchanged.


_________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
~ Albert Einstein