Abraham wrote:
rmgh wrote:
Abraham wrote:
doesn't mean you're gay!
It's because I'm autistic!
Does anyone else here prefer the 'stigma' of being considered a 'ret*d' as opposed to gay? Properly masculine, NT men always treat gay men with evil contempt. But sometimes if they think you're just 'ret*d' they won't be so evil to you.
"Properly masculine, NT men" can be gay as well.
This thread is full of sh*t. Sorry to those who had serious things to say.
YOU are the one who is full of it, my friend.
I would normally have a calm, fair argument to present, but on this occasion, I could not help but be abrupt. Sometimes, it just get's tiring reading what kind of things people say about it all.
I was not referring to the entire post. I now realise that this post was more highlighting the way gay people (or those thought to be gay) are seen by peers. However, this does depend on each persons experiences of others and their opinions on "gays" and "ret*ds". But, nobody should feel annoyed at simply being called gay. No more so than they would be for being called a girl if they are boy or boy if they are a girl. It may be offensive in that you might start to consider the reasons why they might be comparing you to this, but overall, it's simply an incorrect claim.