Page 2 of 3 [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

19 Jun 2011, 10:48 pm

How come the 5's and 6's were hotter than the 7+? What is this i dont even...



Erisad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,058
Location: United States

19 Jun 2011, 10:51 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
How come the 5's and 6's were hotter than the 7+? What is this i dont even...


Because the higher ranked ones are so fake you could find "made in china" stamped on the back of their necks? :lol:



chrissyrun
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,788
Location: Hell :)

19 Jun 2011, 11:01 pm

See, that isn't funny. Girls already have a problem with their appearance.

Points already made that agree with:
*Fat girls are the ones getting it harshly here. I partially agree: there is no problem in saying an ubber-fat person isn't super attractive. (Unless it was totally genetic, which you know that doesn't happen often) because are unhealthy to such an extreme it is an natural reaction to not want to be with them. But fair is fair and if fat girls are judged harshly then boys should too.
*Men should have a scale too, but that would be lame because there are more points to discern of a woman than a man. Other than "those" parts (which girls have 2 main, and guys have one) girls have more to judge. Eyes (they don't pay attention to guys eyes, but they should because those are pretty much the most important feature one someone). Girls are rated on their face, their legs, their body "shape" their youth...what are guys based on? Muscles. Heck, I think I would have it easy as a guy. I mean the first thing I mentioned you can;t really change, but you just work out all the time and you get strong muscles. Job done and done. You can argue all you want but when it comes down to it: guys are viewed on their money, and muscles....girls are viewed on their social skills (great for us aspie gals :? :roll: )and their bodies.
*Finally. I agree with everyone else. PICTURE, PICTURE. Ya wanna judge others, lets see you on a scale.



Solvejg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,558
Location: gondwana

20 Jun 2011, 12:02 am

Well according to that i am a 7. The only compliments i ever get are that i am cute and like the girl next door.

I think the whole thing is silly.


_________________
I love diggin' in the dirt
With just a pick and brush
Finding fossils is my aim
So I'm never in a rush


mv
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,131

20 Jun 2011, 7:37 am

MXH wrote:
I prefer the 0-1 scale in terms of looks. 0 is wont bang, 1 is would bang.


MXH, I think I love you. Binary dating! {P.S. I'd be a 0 in your book, being older than your mother and all}



RICKY5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

20 Jun 2011, 6:42 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
personally, i'd sure like to see a picture of RICKY5. i suspect that someone who finds it funny to judge others' appearance would not stand up under such scrutiny himself.


I've rated a consistent 7.9 out of 10 on hotornot.com



RICKY5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

20 Jun 2011, 6:47 pm

Erisad wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
RICKY5 wrote:
The men's scale would be fun.

Might be rather disappointing to most guys, actually. I remember a study where they had men grade women on a scale and then women grade men on a scale of physical attractiveness.

The men's scale grading the women was pretty evenly distributed.

But when the women graded the men... well, 80% of guys were graded as below average. Harsh. :?


Sucks being evaluated solely on looks doesn't it? You would think that would make guys stop grading women as if we were cuts of meat but I see it probably didn't do much. :/

Yeah RICKY5, what do you look like? You judge people on their looks all the time, so it's only fair if we get a shot at you. :twisted:


I don't judge people on their looks. I simply provide advice that is based on ugly reality.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

20 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm

RICKY5 wrote:
Erisad wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
RICKY5 wrote:
The men's scale would be fun.

Might be rather disappointing to most guys, actually. I remember a study where they had men grade women on a scale and then women grade men on a scale of physical attractiveness.

The men's scale grading the women was pretty evenly distributed.

But when the women graded the men... well, 80% of guys were graded as below average. Harsh. :?


Sucks being evaluated solely on looks doesn't it? You would think that would make guys stop grading women as if we were cuts of meat but I see it probably didn't do much. :/

Yeah RICKY5, what do you look like? You judge people on their looks all the time, so it's only fair if we get a shot at you. :twisted:


I don't judge people on their looks. I simply provide advice that is based on ugly reality.

yes, you do judge based on appearance.... you said before that you like to have attractive "dates". and those ratings were not reality - they are some kind of weird opinion.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


RICKY5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

20 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
How come the 5's and 6's were hotter than the 7+? What is this i dont even...


For once I agree with you toady.

The 4s and up on that page are bangable.



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

20 Jun 2011, 9:03 pm

RICKY5 wrote:
ToadOfSteel wrote:
How come the 5's and 6's were hotter than the 7+? What is this i dont even...


For once I agree with you toady.

The 4s and up on that page are bangable.

^ and THAT would be an example of judging women on appearance.

i didn't see your pic yet, to see if you are "bangable"....


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


RICKY5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

20 Jun 2011, 9:04 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
RICKY5 wrote:
Erisad wrote:
GoatOnFire wrote:
RICKY5 wrote:
The men's scale would be fun.

Might be rather disappointing to most guys, actually. I remember a study where they had men grade women on a scale and then women grade men on a scale of physical attractiveness.

The men's scale grading the women was pretty evenly distributed.

But when the women graded the men... well, 80% of guys were graded as below average. Harsh. :?


Sucks being evaluated solely on looks doesn't it? You would think that would make guys stop grading women as if we were cuts of meat but I see it probably didn't do much. :/

Yeah RICKY5, what do you look like? You judge people on their looks all the time, so it's only fair if we get a shot at you. :twisted:


I don't judge people on their looks. I simply provide advice that is based on ugly reality.

yes, you do judge based on appearance.... you said before that you like to have attractive "dates". and those ratings were not reality - they are some kind of weird opinion.


I'm not crazy about hair splitting numbers as long as a girl doesn't look like a landwhale or act like a catch you next tuesday I'm fine.



ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

20 Jun 2011, 10:07 pm

Ever notice the men who "rank" women on scales also tend to be into PUA-Alpha/Beta-Seduction-I-can't-get-a-date-bullsh!t?


:D


From the same undoubtedly-ankle-braceleted author:

"The female libido responds to one thing and one thing only: power. In whatever form it takes – violence, money, social status, dominant behavior, aloof indifference, etc. – power is the only thing that opens a woman’s floodgates. Game is based on manufacturing signals of power, which is why it works so well.

Battered women love their abusive boyfriends and go back to them time and time again because they can’t help themselves from being irresistibly drawn to the displays of power that their abuse-hotline-poster faces remind them of every time they look in the mirror."



This well-surpasses chauvinism into downright horror-inspiring territory.


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


Erisad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,058
Location: United States

20 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm

Are you trolling Ricky5 or are you really that blind to what's going on here? You said you're a 7 on hotornot.com...just like everyone else. Seriously, I've rarely seen someone on that site ranked lower than that. Frankly, I think you should post a photo here. If you're as hot as you say, that shouldn't be a big deal right? Unless yer fibbing. :/



hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

20 Jun 2011, 10:49 pm

Erisad wrote:
Are you trolling Ricky5 or are you really that blind to what's going on here? You said you're a 7 on hotornot.com...just like everyone else. Seriously, I've rarely seen someone on that site ranked lower than that. Frankly, I think you should post a photo here. If you're as hot as you say, that shouldn't be a big deal right? Unless yer fibbing. :/

yes, have you noticed that he really seems to enjoy coming here just to post items that he knows will be controversial? items with no real informational value whatsoever?


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


Erisad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,058
Location: United States

20 Jun 2011, 10:51 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
Erisad wrote:
Are you trolling Ricky5 or are you really that blind to what's going on here? You said you're a 7 on hotornot.com...just like everyone else. Seriously, I've rarely seen someone on that site ranked lower than that. Frankly, I think you should post a photo here. If you're as hot as you say, that shouldn't be a big deal right? Unless yer fibbing. :/

yes, have you noticed that he really seems to enjoy coming here just to post items that he knows will be controversial? items with no real informational value whatsoever?


Yup. I'm just surprised he hasn't been banned yet. He's been doing this since before I joined last year I'm sure. :/



cdfox7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700

21 Jun 2011, 1:30 am

ValentineWiggin wrote:
Ever notice the men who "rank" women on scales also tend to be into PUA-Alpha/Beta-Seduction-I-can't-get-a-date-bullsh!t?


Yes the 0 to 10 ranking system is talked about in that twunt in a hat Malvolio (lol sorry wrong peacock) book the mystery method. I read that book and it made me feel nauseous.