Height

Post Reply New Topic

I second this, whatever it was.

Yes I would, and I have in the past (not much though, she was only about an inch taller than me).

i'm not very good at sizes

welcome to the bridge, Mr. Spock
i'm also that height, and my worry with a similarly tall woman would be if i was physically size-appropriate to please her conjugally. unlike most men, most tall women anatomically are "tall" inside as well as outside. i learned this from working in a hospital ob//gyn/L&D for 2 decades. i am closer to the right size for somebody approx. 5'2" [eyes of blue or anything]

Are you involved with modelling or acting? I'm honestly not coming onto you (at this particular moment), but natural good-looks, a physique that you obviously work very hard to keep up, and your height alltogether... it just seems like such an obvious career route.

I'm 5'11". Most women are about as "deep" as an index finger when they aren't being, uh... stretched. Besides, width is usually the main concern with both men and women, and IME, there isn't much truth to the idea that height is a good predictor of a man's "size". Pretty sure it goes both ways, especially since we ladies have the advantage of certain exersizes.
The shortest man I've been with was 5'2" and he was plenty adequate. However, it was just too awkward (for him, especially) walking around with me in public. Physical stuff wasn't an issue, though.

Sorry for all the lame euphemisms, but I have a feeling this is teetering on being moved to the Adult section.

I'm 6 ft tall. I was 6'2" until I was 46 and then I started shrinking. I dated a guy 1" shorter than me who later told me that being with me was like being with another guy. I've dated men as short as 5'7" and they always seemed to act like I was some kind of prize they'd won in a contest, like I was there to boost their ego.

I won't say I'll never date a shorter man again but at this point, it's highly unlikely.

I'm having trouble understanding your meaning. Speaking about a penis metaphorically is confusing. Just call it what it is. It's just a body part. There's nothing shameful about a penis.

Do you seriously think it's all about the size of a man's penis? Men are much too concerned about that kind of "size." There are other things for which size is an issue. How about a man have arms long enough to hold a woman, or the strength to pick her up?

Arm length is a ratio of overall body height.

So is strength. A 6ft tall man is always physically stronger than a 5ft man given the assumption both were born,raised,fed, excercised, etc equally. Its simply biomechanics at work.

Perhaps that is why the whole height difference thing is important. Shorter female will be almost always lighter & easier to pick up, have shorter arms that, when they embrace the taller male (which by default also means broader rib cage and wider shoulders) need to fully expand thus providing the female with a more fulfilling sensation and also almost always by default, smaller female means shorter vaginal length that will be trying to accomodate the almost always present longer male member.

For conception that makes a ton of sense biologically... the dna is guaranteed to be transferred efficiently in such a pairing.

^^^ not really because according to my gynecologist women's vaginal length does not correlate to height. they have 3 sizes of speculums (or more) and they start off using the medium one to see if it fits, then go with longer or shorter.

yes, i sat up during my last pap smear and asked about the possibility of a correlation. the gynecologist wasn't used to having scientific conversations with patients in that kind of compromising situation... but he humoured me.

I wasn't speaking metaphorically, I was trying to remain within the guidelines of this forum. And I'm ONLY discussing the size of a man's reproductive organs because the member I quoted above claimed that height and "inner sie" are correlated with women. It's pretty well known that this is most often not the case with menl that's why I brought up men.

I hope that makes things clearer for you.

you're pretty much ok if you keep the conversation biological, FoS. you're in safe territory.

I wouldn't only because any girl taller then me i generally wouldn't find attractive, chicks over 6' 2" aren't my thing. I have met some 6' girls that i would have no problem with though.

Last edited by BillyJoe on 22 Jan 2012, 2:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

if they are bootylicious they can be so at any height.

I think I would prefer a guy who was at least my height. I'm 5'6 so most guys are at least my height or taller so that has not been a problem.

I really have a thing for "tall" girls. Taller than me would be kinda awkward, but I'd probably be just fine with it, as tall girls are hot. I kinda don't really like girls who are like, really short. I'm 5'9, and I think my ideal height for a girl is 5'7ish, I just don't find it quite as attractive a lot of the time if girls are only like 5 feet even. But, you know, hey, height probably won't be too discerning of a factor with me and girls, really, despite everything above I've said. I just find it kinda weird as it seems a lot of guys specifically want a girl who's like, significantly smaller and weaker than them, and I don't quite get that.