Samurai balls are no more (chopped by pinky Katanas).....
not evil wives stealing money
Not directly, but certainly indirectly - in the same way passive-aggression is still abuse.
She's taking his money (she earns none) and squirrels it away for "retirement", which she will spend later. She determined he is not allowed to do the things he used to so the money will be available to her later in life. She may not be squandering it all now on frivolous waste, instead she chained him up in order to secure herself a house and old age "security". His wants/needs are unimportant compared to her need for security.
1.) it's not her retirement, it's theirs, japan doesn't have the ind of safety net we do, without kids you really have to make sure you'll be able to cover your expenses, he'll need security in old age just as much
2.) he lives in that house too
3.) if he wanted to do the budget he could, he choses to delegate the task to his spouse, as it's a cultural custom and it's "too hard"
4.) she's upfront and transparent about where the money is going
if this were legally mandated it would be bad
if she were spending frivilously it would be bad
if she deliberatley obfusticated where the money was being spent it would be bad
I saw no evidence of that in the article, and considering they were presenting it as a "bad thing", if they had evidence of wrong they'd have used it
also as far as her "earning none", her husbands career is facilitated by her taking care of the household, having a house spouse is a career boost (for both en and women, especially if there are children in the picture as with one of these example families)
if you decide as a couple to be one income you can't deride the stay at home partner as a "non-earner"
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89f03/89f031dbd6c284bd8aab996e06c0da8bd1edf327" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,123
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89f03/89f031dbd6c284bd8aab996e06c0da8bd1edf327" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,123
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
DogsWithoutHorses is absolutely right. This is not about gender.
"But he said it was too time consuming so returned the task back to me," she says.
Yoshihiro agrees: "I know how much I make and I now understand how difficult it is to allocate the money".
I am Japanese by the way, and trust me those men are happy that their wives are taking care of the family finance. Their wives are making sure there would be enough money for the retirement, mortgage, education, healthcare, holidays, etc, etc.
Those men know that they CAN have more money to themselves if they really want to, but they chose not to. Of course some Japanese men do take control of the family budget if they cannot trust their wives with the task. It's about teamwork, not a gender issue.
and you can't deride the earner partner as "tightly-limited-money-user"
except it's not derision, it's economics, and most of the money is still being used on his welfare
if there isn't anough income after expenses for more spending money, what is she supposed to do?
couldn't he try to do the budgeting again? (she was willing to let him)
almost 10% of household income (for one individual) as fun money after all expenses and savings isn't that raw of a deal...maybe that's just my perspective from growing up working class, anything after all expenses (even savings) seems pretty darn posh
If these men don't want to keep a house and a wife and children and be able to have a nice standard of living when they can't work anymore
they don't have to have any of it, of they want to be able to spend all or a larger chunck of money of ciggarettes on motorbikes they don't have to support a family
The issue, I'll reiterate, is living expenses being a larger chunk of income than it used to be due to economic downturn. Japan might begin orienting more toward the two income household, which would change family dynamics.
The wife in this situation seems to me to be working as her husbands book keeper, as well as cooking and cleaning and if there are children taking care of them, that's the value she btings to the household.
She's less of an overlord more of an accountant.
_________________
If your success is defined as being well adjusted to injustice and well adapted to indifference, then we don?t want successful leaders. We want great leaders- who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
Last edited by DogsWithoutHorses on 28 Sep 2012, 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nick007
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61a38/61a389a69438b0a0ee31e01a72e9705e2c3653f4" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,786
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA
I think those men are at fault & stupid because they are the 1s giving their wife all their money instead of simply keeping some of it for themselves or hiding some from their wife if need be. They could put their money in one of those cash credit-card things & only have their name on it so the wife cant use it.
_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
"Hear all, trust nothing"
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition
You people need to pull your woman hate stick out of your asses.
As far as I know it is still fairly common for woman to not work and just be a house wife in Japan.
So this isn't a lazy gold digger thing, this is the culture.
On the other hand any man who didn't work would be branded a Hikikomori by the community and fairly despised.
Again it is the culture, not the women.
30,000-50,000 yen is a shedload of money. $381-$641 of free spending money a month.
That is money they can spend on ANYTHING, not money for food, or gas, this is free spending money.
If these men had it their way they would spend every spare cent on crap and be broke when they retire.
These women are doing what every couple should do and the men are simply complaining because they don't think the eating budget of a large family or two is enough spare change to line their pockets.
PS. I'm a man. This isn't abuse. Its life, money management is required, welcome to the real world.
I do the exact same thing that their wives do to myself every month.
The only difference is I sure as hell don't get $300-$600 of spending money and I don't have any extra money to put towards a retirement fund.