nessa238 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
nessa238 wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
He friendzoned you.
By my understanding being 'friendzoned' means the person doesn't want sex with you
Don't underestimate the gender factor.
If the friendzoner is female then your definition is usually the case, if he's male and single then he wouldn't mind having sex with the friendzonee. I bet if you offer free sex to your single male friends then many would be willing to take it.
'Friendzoned' for guys usually means the person doesn't want loving relationship with you, sex is another matter. Not wanting to have sex with you would be the 'repulsive zone'.
Well I'm not interested in anything with him
He says he loves me but his actions demonstrate the opposite
If he wasn't interested in a relationship why risk the Love word?
I said he only wants me for sex and he said it's more than that
hardly anything more though
the person I live with doesn't want sex (we used to be in a relationship) but that is due to him having a low sex drive and not liking the stress that goes with a relationship so this 'repulsive zone' thing isn't accurate
You are making males who get friendzoned feel bad saying this as I'd say it holds the same for men and women but I would never use a word like 'repulsive'
People show their characters via the words they use
A low sex drive is an exception case - not the norm.
And all of us regular people been in a 'repulsive zone' in someone's mind - it's a harsh word but can't find a more accurate synonym.
How many times we hear the word "eww" from men and women when you tell them about someone of the opposite sex? (Ie. like suggesting to ask them out...) , at many times this someone is a friend/acquaintance of their group yet they still ewwed him/her at the thought of it.
I think you'd be surprised how prevalent low sex drive is, plus there's also cases where people with average sex drives go off it
for various reasons
Then there's all the asexual people who just aren't interested in sex in the first place
What do you mean by 'regular people'?
I don't mix with people who use the term' eww' to be quite honest
If I don't find a person someone points out attractive I'd just say they weren't my type or something diplomatic
There's no need at all for harsh words about how people look and I do not like or get on with people who use them
I don't mix with people who go round assessing peoples' sexual attractiveness all the time anyway
I will say if I find someone attractive on TV or in a film occasionally but in public generally not
It's an immature kind of behaviour in my opinion
In fact, the subject of this thread is just the type to regularly judge peoples' looks negatively, while looking nothing special himself and this is another reason I dislike him
There are many reasons why one finds another sexually repulsive, or to be more accurate the idea of having sex with this person, it could be age difference, or someone reminding of a sibling or parent.
I agree that one should be more diplomatic.
By regular people I meant not sex symbol celebs - well statistically speaking even those been seen repulsive by at least someone in this world - so maybe I should have said all people.
Quote:
I don't mix with people who go round assessing peoples' sexual attractiveness all the time anyway
I will say if I find someone attractive on TV or in a film occasionally but in public generally not
It's an immature kind of behaviour in my opinion
In life, sometimes you find yourself sitting with people whom their values contradict yours, they could be coworkers, or people invited by friends, or colleagues in some class, or people you thought highly of and turned out to be something else.
07 May 2013, 6:07 am
